Not exact matches
There are many forms
of abuse and neglect and many governments have developed their own legal definition
of what constitutes child maltreatment for the
purposes of removing a child or prosecuting a
criminal charge.
«As if the palpable odium
of intiating a vacuous
criminal charge against a whistle - blower, no less a person than a distinguished senator
of the Federal Republic
of Nigeria was not bad enough, the prosecuting authority, obviously urged on by the Inspector General
of Police, threw pretension to adherence to democratic tenets
of the rule
of law when it sought from the court, albeit most illegally, to obtain summons against Senator Misau, while deliberately witholding service
of the copy
of the
charge on the Senator, an obvious stratagem conceived to frame up all manner
of false allegations tailored to suit the obvious
purpose of yet another gestapo strategy to use state powers to swoop on the Distinguished Senator and keep him out
of circulation»
Although the state constitution and county charter prohibit the use
of government resources for political
purposes, «it is nearly impossible to bring a
criminal charge for these abuses under current law,» Singas wrote.
There are many forms
of abuse and neglect and many governments have developed their own legal definition
of what constitutes child maltreatment for the
purposes of removing a child or prosecuting a
criminal charge.
-- Drug Offences, including Possession and Possession for the
Purpose of Trafficking; — Firearm and Weapons Offences; — Property - related Offences, including Theft, Break and Enter, and Mischief; — Assaults, including Domestic Assaults; — Impaired Driving Offences, including Drive while Impaired, Drive Over 80, Refusal
of a Demand, and Impaired Care or Control; —
charges against young persons under the Youth
Criminal Justice Act.
We remain true to this
purpose regardless
of whether our client has suffered a serious personal injury as the result
of another's negligence, or they have been arrested and
charged with a serious
criminal offense.
It is an abdication
of a prosecutor's duty to the public to bring unsupported
criminal charges, and the abdication is aggravated when those
charges are brought based on an impermissible
purpose such as public pressure.
The Court
of Appeal has held that there is only a requirement to caution the interviewee if the interview is conducted by people who are specifically
charged with the duty
of investigating offences (ie, people employed by a company for the
purpose of investigating crimes committed by its staff).4 A private employer investigating and interviewing an employee as part
of an internal investigation or disciplinary process will not normally amount to a
criminal investigation, even if the investigation involves conduct that may constitute a
criminal offence.
The client was
charge with possession
of a prohibited weapon and possession
of a weapon for a dangerous
purpose contrary to s 88 (1) and 86 (1)
of the
Criminal Code when...
«The characterization
of conduct as involving one or more transactions is primarily a distinction drawn for the
purposes of determining whether a
charge as framed by the Crown conforms with the pleading requirement in s. 581 and s. 589
of the
Criminal Code,» the OCA panel said.
If the privilege is available, advantages
of asserting the privilege include that the client may be prevented from making statements in a civil proceeding that could be used against him or her in future
criminal or civil proceedings or private civil litigation.82 In addition, testifying in a civil or
criminal proceeding may, under certain circumstances, amount to a waiver
of the Fifth Amendment privilege for
purposes of the same proceeding and any future proceedings.83 Conversely, risks
of asserting the privilege include that adverse inferences may, under certain circumstances, be drawn in civil or administrative proceedings from an individual's assertion
of Fifth Amendment rights in a prior civil or administrative proceeding.84 Moreover, an individual's assertion
of the privilege in a civil proceeding could factor into law enforcement's
charging decisions.
The team
of Lawyers at Strom Law Firm remain true to this
purpose regardless
of whether our client has suffered a serious personal injury as the result
of another's negligence, or they have been arrested and
charged with a serious
criminal offense.
Where an employer suspends an employee for the
purpose of investigating complaints or allegations
of misconduct or pending the determination
of criminal charges, the situation gets slightly more complicated.
26 With respect to Count 10, it was conceded by the Crown during submissions that the
charge that the accused in Vienna on December 24, 2003, «for the
purpose of procuring a passport for himself», provided false information to obtain a visa to enter Canada, was not only contradictory on its face, but the evidence failed to establish any offence under s. 57
of the
Criminal Code.
The primary
purpose of this San Diego
criminal lawyer website is to give you a clear understanding
of what our law firm is all about, how our knowledge can help get your case dropped or reduced, and help you understand the basic laws governing your
charges.
Typical
criminal charges that we defend are impaired driving, dangerous driving, hit and run, theft under $ 5000, assault, uttering threats,
criminal harassment, possession for the
purposes of trafficking narcotics, trafficking
of a controlled substance, obtaining sexual services for consideration, mischief to property.
When facing the serious
charge of marijuana possession for the
purposes of trafficking, you need a
criminal defence lawyer who is current on the legal issues and meticulous in preparing your defence.
Non-derogating control order proceedings under the Prevention
of Terrorism Act 2005 (PTA 2005) do not involve the determination
of a
criminal charge for the
purposes of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention), Art 6 (1) but the standard may be equivalently high under the civil limb
of Art 6 (1).
The questions included: (i) whether or not a non-derogating control order imposed under PTA 2005 constituted a
criminal charge for the
purposes of Art 6
of the Convention; and (ii) whether or not the procedures provided for by PTA 2005, s 3 and the rules
of court were compatible with Art 6 in circumstances where they had resulted in a case made against a person subject to a control order being in its essence entirely undisclosed to him and in no specific allegation
of terrorism - related activity being contained in open material.
For example, if the prosecution files a
charge with the court or if the suspect flees the country for the
purpose of avoiding
criminal penalties, the limitation period is suspended.
There are many forms
of abuse and neglect and many governments have developed their own legal definition
of what constitutes child maltreatment for the
purposes of removing a child and / or prosecuting a
criminal charge.