For
purposes of rules determining price limits and trading halts, RTH and ETH refer to, respectively, the Regular Trading Hours and the Electronic Trading Hours of the Standard and Poor's MidCap 400 Stock Price Index Futures.
Not exact matches
In
determining a taxpayer's eligibility to claim a dependency exemption, these proposed regulations change the IRS's position regarding the adjusted gross income
of a taxpayer filing a joint return for
purposes of the tiebreaker
rules and the source
of support
of certain payments that originated as governmental payments.
For
purposes of the table in «Executive Compensation — Summary Compensation Table» below, we are required to report pursuant to applicable SEC
rules any stock option grants to Mr. Musk at values
determined as
of their respective grant dates and which are driven by certain assumptions prescribed by Financial Accounting Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, «Compensation — Stock Compensation» («ASC Topic 718»).
Any Employee regularly employed on a full - time or part - time (20 hours or more per week on a regular schedule) basis, or on any other basis as
determined by the Corporation (if required under applicable local law) for
purposes of the Non-423 Plan or any separate offering under the Code Section 423 Plan, by the Corporation or by any Designated Affiliate on an Entry Date shall be eligible to participate in the Plan with respect to the Offering Period commencing on such Entry Date, provided that the Committee may establish administrative
rules requiring that employment commence some minimum period (e.g., one pay period) prior to an Entry Date to be eligible to participate with respect to the Offering Period beginning on that Entry Date.
Our board
of directors has affirmatively
determined that Messrs. Vivian and Guillemin meet the definition
of «independent director» for
purposes of serving on an audit committee under
Rule 10A - 3 and the New York Stock Exchange
rules, and we intend to comply with the other independence requirements within the time periods specified.
For
purposes of this Charter, an «independent director» means a director who (1) is «independent» in accordance with the provisions
of Rule 10c - 1 (b)(i) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended (the «Exchange Act»), and (2) meets the NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. definition
of «independent director» as
determined by the Board.
Our board
of directors has affirmatively
determined that each
of Messrs. and meets the definition
of «independent director» for
purposes of the listing
rules and for
purposes of Section 162 (m)
of the Internal Revenue Code.
Accordingly, notwithstanding receipt
of the IRS private letter
ruling and / or opinions
of counsel or other external tax advisors, the IRS could
determine that the distribution and certain related transactions should be treated as taxable transactions for U.S. federal income tax
purposes if it
determines that any
of the facts, assumptions, representations, statements or undertakings that were included in the request for the IRS private letter
ruling or on which any opinion was based are false or have been violated.
Our board
of directors is expected to
determine that at least one member
of the Audit Committee is an «audit committee financial expert» for
purposes of the
rules of the SEC.
In Revenue
Ruling 57 - 127, the IRS Commissioner
determined that funds from a government foundation used by an individual for the
purpose of conducting a research project free from direction and control
of the institution were not to be considered a fellowship because the foundation reserved rights in patents resulting from the research, thereby establishing a quid pro quo.
For the
purpose of determining the holder
of an instrument, the following
rules apply:
Each type
of dependent is subject to different
rules, but the
purpose of this article is to help you
determine if you are a qualifying child.
, some
of you may see how a judge may not give a damn what Chase says about arbitration requirements or their right according to the agreement to change it at any time however they want, fundamentally Chase is using legalise to avoid accountability for fraud, and the
ruling shall therefore be, for the interests
of justice to be properly served, that these contractual provisions shall set aside for the
purposes of determining the charges.
You would have to check with the municipal property tax office to see what the
rules are for the
purposes of determining the amount
of any transfer taxes.
The governments
of Sweden and Australia each have their own
rules to
determine whether you are a resident
of that country for tax
purposes.
For the
purposes of this
rule, one mini-sized corn contract is equivalent to one - fifth
of a corresponding full - sized corn contract, and positions in corn and mini-sized corn will be aggregated for the
purpose of determining compliance with the contracts» position limit.
Under PBGC's premium regulations, specific
rules apply for
determining whether a benefit is vested for
purposes of calculating a single - employer plan's variable - rate premium.
For example, to
determine what constitutes a new v. old
rule of U.S. Senate procedure, or to
determine which statute is newer or older for
purposes of determining which statute
of two that conflict should be given effect when there was a cosmetic recodification
of the section numbers
of one
of the titles but not the other without changing the substantive meaning
of the recodified statute.
Where a workplace accident has occurred, and the employer has statutory duties under sections 18 and 19
of the OHSA and simultaneously undertakes an internal investigation, claiming legal privilege over all materials derived as part
of that investigation, an inquiry is properly directed to a referee under
Rule 6.45 to
determine the dominant
purpose for the creation
of each document or bundle
of like documents in order to assess the claims
of legal privilege.
«We ought not attribute to Congress an official
purpose based on the motives
of a particular group that lobbied for or against a certain proposal — even assuming the precise intent
of the group can be
determined, a point doubtful both as a general
rule and in the instant case.
In the Missouri case, Watts v. Lester E. Cox Medical Centers, the state high court
ruled 4 - 3 that the law capping noneconomic damages at $ 350,000 «is unconstitutional to the extent that it infringes on the jury's constitutionally protected
purpose of determining the amount
of damages sustained by an injured party.»
The alleged illegality
of Akcenta's situation is therefore irrelevant for the
purpose of determining whether the conditions for an infringement
of the competition
rules are met.
The case, Aldana v. Stillwagon, presented the issue
of whether a case involving a regular traffic accident caused by an on - duty paramedic should be considered a «medical malpractice» case for the
purpose of determining which procedural
rules apply.
Applying the statutory construction
rules and reviewing the legislative history, the Supreme Court held that the
purpose of the counseling provision was to ensure that criminal convictions were known to and considered by the courts when
determining custody
of children, and to
determine whether any lingering danger might exist.
The Secretary would
determine which plans that meet these criteria would to be considered health plans for the
purposes of this
rule.
L. 104 - 121), the Administrator
of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
of the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) has
determined that this
rule is a major
rule for the
purpose of congressional review.
A covered entity is not in violation
of the requirements
of this
rule when a member
of its workforce or a business associate
of the covered entity discloses protected health information to: (i) A health oversight agency or public health authority authorized by law to investigate or otherwise oversee the relevant conduct or conditions
of the covered entity; (ii) an appropriate health care accreditation organization; or (iii) an attorney, for the
purpose of determining his or her legal options with respect to whistleblowing.
There are three exceptions to this general
rule of preemption: State laws that the Secretary
determines are necessary for certain
purposes set forth in the statute; state laws that the Secretary
determines address controlled substances; and state laws relating to the privacy
of Start Printed Page 82471individually identifiable health information that are contrary to and more stringent than the federal requirements.
The final
rule creates a narrower exemption for Department
of State for uses and disclosures
of protected health information (1) for
purposes of a required security clearance conducted pursuant to Executive Orders 10450 and 12698; (2) as necessary to meet the requirements
of determining worldwide availability or availability for mandatory service abroad under Sections 101 (a)(4) and 504
of the Foreign Service Act; and (3) for a family member to accompany a Foreign Service Officer abroad, consistent with Section 101 (b)(5) and 904
of the Foreign Service Act.
For the Department
of State, however, the final
rule provides a limited exemption that allows a component
of the Department
of State without an authorization to (1) use protected health information to make medical suitability determinations and (2) to disclose whether or not the individual was
determined to be medically suitable to authorized officials in the Department
of State for the
purpose of a security clearance investigation conducted pursuant to Executive Order 10450 and 12698.
Specifically, we include provisions in the final
rule that allow individuals to opt out
of certain types
of disclosures and require covered entities to use professional judgment to
determine whether disclosure
of protected health information is in a patient's best interest (see § 164.510 (a) on use and disclosure for facility directories and § 164.510 (b) on uses and disclosures for assisting in an individual's care and notification
purposes).
For practical
purposes this means that in
determining issues
of EC law the English courts must follow the same principles as the European Court
of Justice (ECJ) and apply any relevant
rulings of the EC courts.
Five cases decided together raise a number
of issues concerning the interpretation
of the new
Rule 20, including the nature
of the test for
determining whether or not summary judgment should be granted, the scope and
purpose of the new powers that have been given to judges hearing motions for summary judgment, and the types
of cases that are amenable to summary judgment.
The incoming data protection
rules apply to both data controllers (i.e. entities that
determine the
purpose and means
of processing personal data) and data processors (entities that are responsible for processing data on behalf
of a data controller — aka subcontractors).
The federal circuit has
ruled that for the
purposes of determining where a patent case is heard, a business is considered active in any state in which its products or services are available.
The first set
of amendments, proposed in April 2013 and published on July 24, 2013, clarify, correct, or amend provisions on the relation to State law
of Regulation X's servicing provisions; implementation dates for adjustable rate mortgage servicing; exclusions from requirements on higher - priced mortgage loans; the small servicer exemption from certain servicing
rules; the use
of government - sponsored enterprise and Federal agency purchase, guarantee or insurance eligibility for
determining qualified mortgage status; and the determination
of debt and income for
purposes of originating qualified mortgages.