A number of elements in modern thought have coalesced to bring about this picture of an evolving universe impermeable to any divine
purposive influence.
In searching for any evidence of
purposive influence, the scientific approach tends to look for instances of discontinuity in natural processes whereby a teleological push or pull would insert itself somewhat obtrusively into the fabric of nature.
Not exact matches
So far I have argued three points: that persons engage in behavior patterns which can be characterized as
purposive, i. e., as exhibiting a structure of aims, values, and methods of attainment; that individuals and institutions are interrelated, with each side
influencing and being
influenced by the purposes and activities of the other, although with neither being in any way reducible to or explicable solely in terms of the other; and that the institutional pole in this interaction shares with the individual as its opposite those characteristics that define its behavioral patterns as
purposive.
For that it was necessary to establish that the individual entities of existence are themselves of such a nature that they could be responsive to
influences that can be called
purposive.
Accordingly, the primary experience of receiving with emotional and
purposive subjective form the causal
influence of other actualities tends to be only dimly illuminated in consciousness precisely because it is primary.
However, there is a mode of consciousness by which we at the human level of emergence might become aware, in a non - controlling, non-comprehensive sort of way, of possible higher
purposive principles and patterns of
influence operative in the cosmos.