With regard to the question of compatibility of the imposition of a residence condition with Articles 29 and 33 of the Directive, after having found that these Articles in principle require an equal treatment of all
beneficiaries of international protection as regards the freedom of movement (Article 33) and a treatment that is equal to nationals of the relevant Member State in the matter of welfare benefits (Article 29), the Court concludes that a residence condition can still be imposed on
beneficiaries of subsidiary protection status, if they are not in an objectively comparable situation with
beneficiaries of other international protection status or nationals of the Member States as regards the objective
pursued by the national law that seems to infringe on Articles 29 and 33 (point 54 of the judgment).