[I] t would be «irrational and irresponsible» to implement sustained albedo modification without also
pursuing emissions mitigation, carbon dioxide removal, or both.
The committee said it would be «irrational and irresponsible» to implement sustained albedo modification without also
pursuing emissions mitigation, carbon dioxide removal, or both.
Not exact matches
At the same time, the developing major economies will
pursue, in the context of sustainable development, nationally appropriate
mitigation actions, supported and enabled by technology, financing and capacity - building, with a view to achieving a deviation from business as usual
emissions.
ICAO's Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA) is designed to complement the basket of
mitigation measures the air transport community is already
pursuing to reduce CO2
emissions from international aviation.
At the same time, emerging economies need support to
pursue the path of low carbon development and
mitigation in order to reduce
emissions in emerging economies.
You may wonder why the government finds the need to
pursue such action since 1) U.S. carbon dioxide
emissions have already topped out and have generally been on the decline for the past 7 - 8 years or so (from technological advances in natural gas extraction and a slow economy more so than from already - enacted government regulations and subsidies); 2) greenhouse gases from the rest of the world (primarily driven by China) have been sky - rocketing over the same period, which lessens any impacts that our
emissions reduction have); and 3) even in their totality, U.S. carbon dioxide
emissions have a negligible influence on local / regional / global climate change (even a immediate and permanent cessation of all our carbon dioxide
emissions would likely result in a
mitigation of global temperature rise of less than one - quarter of a degree C by the end of the century).