At the end of the day, we need to
push carbon credits through and address the small fraction of people for whom it has extreme negative effects.
Not exact matches
The expansion of the pellets - to -
carbon -
credit scheme has the feel of an energy rush akin to what happened in Pennsylvania in the early days of the hydraulic fracturing boom and the destructive palm oil
push that affected food prices.
Add to the fact that the «solutions» to a problem (which may be man made or man made - up) is cap and trade and
carbon credits only further fuels the skepticism - particularly when the very ones who are
pushing the global warming agenda are those who are in a position to profit from it (ie Al Gore).
It will be a very interesting day when a major news reporting service publishes a series of stories detailing the fraud, proving the deception and debunking the lies perpetrated by hundreds of people globally who have
pushed for various
carbon taxes and trading
credit markets (mostly for their own enrichment), based on the various questionable and outright wrong «scientific» studies which «proved» something was happening when it actually wasn't.
While the Indians aggressively
pushed for REDD + + in negotiations and the Americans argued for an even broader approach to land use - based emissions including the recognition of
carbon absorbed by all land use change, African negotiators took a softer approach —
pushing for REDD, but willing to take a rain check on AFOLU, even as the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA) was promoting its «BioCarbon» initiative, which explicitly endorses
credits from sustainable agriculture and forestry.
Obama is
pushing for a
carbon trading bill in the United States because he stands to makes millions if not billions of dollars from this scam, trading in
carbon credits (a made - up solution for a non-existent problem).