Sentences with phrase «put publisher name»

A paragraph, possible boxed, indicating how books may be purchased singularly or in bulk — this is where you can put Publisher name, website, how to email or phone for books directly.

(Yes, even if they put YOUR publisher name as an imprint on Amazon.)

They even have a place for you to put your publisher name.

Then in italics under that in 12 point put «Copyright 2010 by (Author name)» You can put your publisher name under that if you want, but do not say the copyright is by the publisher.

Not exact matches

If Maharaj is named to such a post, would current Times publisher Tim Ryan — put in place by Jack Griffin when he fired Austin Beutner in September — leave the company?

Submergence is based on J.M. Ledgard's critically acclaimed book of the same name; NPR, Publishers Weekly, The New York Times and more all praised the work and put it on their best books of 2013 lists.

Although the works of Tolstoy are public domain, you wouldn't just put a sticker over the publisher's name in the new Penguin edition and try to resell it as your own work, would you?

But despite your arrogant demands writers will still put their work out there just as publishers will still make money off named authors and the readers will be the ones that decide what they want to read.

But it will take a publisher who can publish top names, do enhanced production and books, and knows how to put out top - quality leather and signed work.

And yes, it's equally lovely to put that noteable name on the front cover, and any publisher worth their salt capitalize on it.

If the print publisher has the copyright over the print publication, partly because you let it do so as part of the deal that they «put it together» for you, and has also registered the print ISBN in their name, this does not stop you making an eBook (so long as it does not use the creative design work of the print book) and registering the second and future ISBNs in your own name as author — as you should have done anyway.

Don't put your name or publisher name here.

When I self - publish I put my own name as the publisher.

At last month's FutureBook Conference, Soucebooks» CEO and publisher Dominque Raccah sat down to speak with GoodeReader about the newly launched Put Me In The Story platform, an interactive ebook publishing model that lets parents and educators use the readers» own pictures and names in the bestselling children's... [Read more...]

Beyond other publishers whose titles allow for incorporating a name or photo, Put Me In The Story will eventually work for any title in the platform.

Whether it's a publisher that'll put a good amount of money behind the book or a top flight author's name that'll gain recognition, this is an awesome way to get our name out there.

A lot of us are taking back our pen names, by putting on the cover and in description something like «Sarah A. Hoyt writing as Sarah D'Almeida» Agatha Christie books in the US often have completely different names than in the UK and publishers on line who know you might read both will say stuff like «And Then There Was None» originally published as «Ten Little Indians.»

Unless one is a huge name, we have reached the point where publishers do nothing for their authors other than put the physical books together and toss them out into the universe.

Just make sure you put that company name inside the book as the publisher of record (and add it to your book's metadata as publisher when you upload it to retailers and distributors).

One other friend of mine left he was in the real estate space wrote a book with with a major publishing house and then a few years later stopped he left real estate and went into a really strong personal development business and the publisher went up well you're not promoting this book anymore and they took his book word - for - word and put somebody else's name on the cover of it and just put a new introduction on it no credit to anybody he had worked because he had two co-authors help him with it because he's dyslexic so they essentially were the ones that wrote it and he provided a lot of the content and the publisher gave those other authors no credit took his name off and put somebody else's name on the front and then the publisher was 100 % within their rights to do it so you know there's a lot of things that I challenge people to kind of think about what's important and if you're putting all your expertise into this book you want to make sure that somebody's negotiated a heck out of it giving you a contract that actually makes sense for you and your business.

The only problem with this is that those authors demanding their rights back are the ones who have figured out that they can make money without having the «big name publisher» putting out their e-books.

Thomas Nelson is a large publisher, but they don't put their name on the books nearly as prominently as many Harlequin lines do.

To me, a great publisher puts out the best product they can - no typos, no changed character names out of nowhere, a story that flows smoothly... Harlequin has done this for years, but now they are going to put their name on any old drivel as long as they are paid enough.

On top of that, all of the editions they put out have the publisher's name all over it.

Author Stephen King wrote multiple books under the name Richard Bachman, in part to try out new ideas, but also because his publisher advised him not to put out more than one book a year.

B&N doesn't give you a clue other than the publisher's name; it's probably best to download the free sample and be sure it's non-DRM before putting your money down at B&N.

The new name puts EA's formal corporate weight behind this direction: the studio sits within the EA Casual Entertainment paddock at the mega publisher, and under the fresh face of Harvey Elliot, who was named head of studio in June last year.

I have scanned the boxes and below them I've put the name, publisher and the genre, i.e. platformer, action, shooter etc..

Friend to Rabetts and publisher of Monckton, Nexus 6, has put forth the name of God.

The supposition that if the Plaintiff knows the name of one proprietor he can make him tell the names of all the others, but that, not knowing one name, he can not get the information from the printer and publisher, who is the agent of the proprietors, and is put forth to stand between them and the public, is one that does not commend itself to one's common sense, and is not to be accepted without absolute necessity...