These alternative approaches, known as the «basket of measures» in ICAO jargon, will not alone
put the aviation industry on track to achieve carbon neutral growth after 2020, according to a paper by Professor David Lee, who leads the Centre for Aviation, Transport and the Environment at Manchester Metropolitan University.
Not exact matches
In February, 2016, shortly after we
put up this post, the International Civil
Aviation Organization, the United Nations»
aviation agency, announced an agreement with the global
aviation industry to impose binding limits on CO2 emissions for all new airplanes delivered after 2028.
Terry Barker of the Cambridge Centre for Climate Change Mitigation Research (4CMR) is looking to
put together two proposals for schemes to decarbonise the
aviation and shipping
industries in time for the climate change negotiations in December.
It is only sensible that we should do so, and if we do, and if in particular we reach the conclusion that they should use the methodology implied in the impact assessment and not the absurd methods used by Sir Nicholas Stern, now Lord Stern — he received his reward — they would reach a conclusion very similar to that advocated by the hon. Gentleman on Second Reading: that we should
put far more emphasis on adaptation to helping poor countries cope with climate change, rather than on crippling our
industries —
aviation, shipping and all the other
industries — to little avail.
These initiatives
put aviation on a path to address its climate impact, but are heavily opposed by the
industry, which demands continued exemptions from such efforts to reduce the sector's greenhouse gas emissions.