«
We put less stock in diagnoses,» said Regal.
That's why I tend to
put less stock in it for edge rushers and tackles.
Not exact matches
They
put less trust and
stock in ads and even use ad blockers en masse, which has dampened the success of many marketing campaigns.
«
Put it all together, and Lang says that Red Hat really just needs to rally
less than three dollars from here, to $ 100, at which point he expects the
stock to roar higher before temporarily running out of steam at the $ 110 area.»
If you're a short to intermediate - term swing trader of
stocks, keep reading for juicy details that will
put you on the path to greater trading profits with
less risk.
If you want to
put all $ 500,000 into AT&T
stock for a 5 % dividend yield, be my guest, but that's still only $ 25,000 a year to live when you're 40 which is probably equivalent to $ 20,000 or
less in today's dollars.
And if you choose funds that hold a broad range of
stocks and bonds and work in synch with each other, you can
put together a well - diversified portfolio with just a few funds, or even
less.
Sam instead of buying SF property years ago, wouldn't you have had a better return and
less headache
putting it all in the
stock market?
Without the protective
put, if you sold the
stock at $ 55, your pretax profit would be just $ 500 ($ 5,500
less $ 5,000).
Essentially, if the
stock goes up, you have unlimited profit potential (
less the cost of the
put options), and if the
stock goes down, the
put goes up in value to offset losses on the
stock.
For instance, if at the expiration of the
put contract the
stock reaches your $ 70 price target, you might then choose to sell the
stock for a pretax profit of $ 1,700 ($ 2,000 profit on the underlying
stock less the $ 300 cost of the option) and the option would expire worthless.
Square bettors will frequently
put too much
stock into these rankings despite the fact that many voters are not watching every game and are actually far
less informed than the oddsmakers.
Other than that, I can't
put much
stock (any, really) on these stats after
less than 2 weeks of baseball.
Square bettors will frequently
put too much
stock into these rankings despite the fact that many voters are not watching every game and are far
less informed than their oddsmaker counterparts.
quare bettors will frequently
put too much
stock into these rankings despite the fact that many voters are not watching every game and are far
less informed than their oddsmaker counterparts.
While I don't
put much
stock in home birth horror stories as evidence that home birth is
less safe than hospital (because I don't know how they compare to the number of hospital horror stories), I put even LESS stock in «I would have died if I hadn't been in the hospital» stor
less safe than hospital (because I don't know how they compare to the number of hospital horror stories), I
put even
LESS stock in «I would have died if I hadn't been in the hospital» stor
LESS stock in «I would have died if I hadn't been in the hospital» stories.
I don't really
put too much
stock in academic authority of people in social sciences until they talk about testable predictions like real scientists do; or at the very least deal with # s. Without that, they're just people who have opinions that are no more nor
less valid than anyone who isn't an academic social scientist.
«In response to regulatory reform and a change in compensation that
puts more on long - term profitability and sustainable profitability, you're seeing compensation being
less in terms of the cash bonuses than we saw in the past and more in terms of
stock options, other kinds of deferred compensation,» DiNapoli told Lamb.
«It wasn't an impressive delivery because we were not given detailed briefing about the supplementary budget; he didn't talk about fiscal policy except to mention
putting less pressure on the interest rate and also said Ghana
Stock Exchange is to support the energy sector; but being the acting Power Minister, he didn't stress on the energy crisis and that's a very big problem.
Yet Kemper has been plagued by cost overruns, rising from
less than $ 3 billion to $ 5.5 billion today and
putting pressure on Southern's
stock.
If you
put your $ 5,000 into a riskier asset class such as
stocks (ie a
stock mutual fund) then in 6 months your investment might be worth more than $ 5,000 or it could be worth
less than $ 5,000 (possibly a lot
less).
It typically takes a lot
less capital for my short
put positions (on margin) compared to holding
stock.
One major advantage of using a long call option rather than buying a
stock outright is
putting up much
less capital to control 100 shares — that's the power of leverage.
And since a more conservative
stocks - bonds mix can reduce your potential for long - term gains,
putting more of your nest egg into bonds or cash could mean that you'll end up with
less spending cash over the course or retirement, or that you'll run through your savings more quickly.
On the other hand, if you were to
put that $ 10,000 into safer investments generating an average annual 4 % return, in 40 years, you'd have just $ 48,000 —
less than a quarter of what a
stock - heavy portfolio would have given you.
As pioneering value investor Benjamin Graham
put it: «No portfolio should ever have more than 75 % in
stocks or
less than 25 % in
stocks.»
So, if you hold the investment for
less than a year, you're opening yourself up to the risks of short - term
stock fluctuations as well as potential tax penalties, so if you
put your emergency fund in
stocks you're essentially betting that you won't have an emergency that year (which by definition you can't know).
By
putting together a portfolio of broad
stock and bond index funds (as you apparently have done), you can reduce annual expenses in some cases to as little as 0.10 % a year or
less vs. upwards of 1 % or more annually for actively managed funds.
When you add new money to an existing portfolio, it
puts more new money toward lower performing
stocks, and
less toward the best performers.
With most
stock dividends paying
less than 2 percent right now it makes sense to
put your money into safe bonds.
So, if you pay down your mortgage, you might need
less bonds / money market / emergency funds and can
put more in
stocks.
If you'd
put it in dividend
stocks, as I'm sure Bill would recommend, you'd have paid very substantially
less tax over the years on the proceeds.
That's right... 5 %
less than the current price of the
stock and that's if it assigned to us in 42 days... and each time we sell
puts we lower the cost basis even more.
While BVF's slate was not successful at the special meeting, AVGN's board now plans to develop its own plan of liquidation, which should
put a floor on AVGN's
stock at around its net cash value of $ 37M or $ 1.24 per share
less wind down costs.
The idea is to
put a small chunk of the investor's allocation to
stocks — say, 20 % or
less — in hedge funds to increase diversification and stabilize the portfolio during severe market downturns.
My point is simply that it's very likely that if you are moving money in and out of
stocks based on volatility, you're much
less likely to get the full market return over the long term, and might be better off
putting more weight in asset classes with lower volatility.
The conversations lasted a week or two, as Clete and Krista carefully considered their options, recognizing that taking too little risk would mean leaving their kids with
less, but
putting too much in
stocks might make them jittery.
If those $ 2000 are «funny money» that you don't mind losing but would be really excited about maybe getting 100 % return in
less than 5 years, well, feel free to
put them into an individual
stock of an obscure small company, but be aware that you'd be gambling, not investing, and you can probably get better quotes playing Roulette.
Therefore, a
put option is «in - the - money» when the underlying
stock is worth
less than the option's strike price.
If you
put your $ 5,000 into a riskier asset class, such as
stocks (or a
stock mutual fund), then in 6 months your investment might be worth more than $ 5,000 — or it might be worth
less.
Here, the idea was to test whether people understood that a
stock mutual fund contains many
stocks and that investing in a large group of
stocks is generally
less risky than
putting all one's money into a the
stock of a single company.
Anyway, I disagree: As I've stressed before, I always have plenty of new ideas & potential buys stacked up, the struggle is deciding what to actually pull the trigger on... I could just as easily
put together a portfolio of deep - value
stocks (for example, trading for
less than 40p on the pound) today, as I could focus on buying high quality / growth
stocks.
I take the fiduciary side of this seriously, and will tell clients that want to
put a lot of their money in my
stock strategy that they need
less risk, and should
put funds in my bond strategy, where I earn
less.
These
stocks are more volatile and
less widely traded than the well - established companies we favour, so they can
put on more impressive gains in a short time.
If you want to experience
less risk, or if you are older, it's often good to
put your investment into a managed fund that combines many
stocks into its shares.
Many almost retirees who were heavily invested in
stocks lost a lot of money, and either had to
put off retirement and continue working or try to live off of
less money.
But even after decades of dividend growth, anyone
putting new money into these
stocks today will capture
less than 3.5 % yields.
If you are an individual investor who would like to
put more of your capital into income - generating dividend
stocks and
less into paying brokerage fees, you may be looking for alternatives to traditional
stock purchasing.
And if you choose funds that hold a broad range of
stocks and bonds and work in synch with each other, you can
put together a well - diversified portfolio with just a few funds, or even
less.
The more
stocks you
put into your portfolio the
less concentrated your portfolio will be in the best opportunities.