Sentences with phrase «put more water vapor»

Water comes into play because CO2 driven warming will put more water vapor in the atmosphere, because greater heat will vaporize more water.

We know that more open water will put more water vapor in the air, and increase the sunlight absorbed each summer, both of which will lead to yet more warming.

Rising temperatures would put more water vapor into the atmosphere, which then rains out, increasing the amount of dissolved carbon dioxide that chemically interacts with the rocks.

According to this scenario, warming temperatures heat up the surface of the oceans, increasing evaporation and putting more water vapor into the atmosphere.

Not exact matches

Given the sensible & latent heat transport # s above, it doesn't seem very plausible for convection & conduction to play a role comparable to radiation (especially because latent heat transport also puts more moister in the upper atm, and that water vapor feedback traps more radiation).

CHris O» What you are saying put «pretty simpl [y]» is «the warmer the oceans and the atmosphere [get] the more water vapor [the] more greenhouse effect from water vapor in the atmosphere.»

in addition another thought they do not bring up is under sea volcanic activity may heat up the oceans, increasing the amounts of water vapor put into the atmosphere which could result in more snowfall and eventual glaciation.

As the climate warms, more water vapor is put into the atmosphere, which enhances the greenhouse effect.

A simple example, increased water vapor [a GHG], leading to much more clouds and greater albedo means that more energy will be reflected to space meaning that the effective heat source drops in intensity hence the temperature must fall back or as Lucia would put it, fails to go up any more [She does not believe feedbacks can be ultimately negative].

In less than a year... It is likely as explained a combination of gradual GHG heat build up, (ice melting) finally triggering more specific humidity, a greater water vapor presence, especially due to open water of the more open Arctic Ocean Your solar explanation fails and should be put to rest.

Or put another way, if there is so much water vapor around (3 % vs only 390ppm for CO2), and more GHGs means more warming, why does the GHE stop at 33C instead of continuing until all the water vapor absorbs a photon OR asked another way, who says that all the water vapor caused by the added CO2 will absorb a photon to cause more GHE warming?