If your 401 (k) plan offers a dozen or so investments, you're probably better off
putting at least some money in all of the options.
Not exact matches
Much as advisers cling to the long - term view of portfolio management, there's something to be said from jumping out and in of over - and underperforming asset classes,
at least with
money you can afford to
put at greater risk.
So, our dentist here ought to spend double the
money,
putting in two ads; one with a «smiler whitener» hook to attract the (yellow teeth - ed,
at least in their own mind) new clients, and a separate, ad for those with a toothless grin, who want to have teeth so they can look good in pictures
at the upcoming wedding of the grandkid whose finally settling down... well some of the toothless anyway.
He goes on to say that, in the absence of a willingness to learn about the market, investors should
at least put their
money with a qualified registered advisor so that there is some accountability for the advice they receive.
Go running (or in my case, biking) around town chasing down investors and startups all
at the same time, simultaneously pitching your strategy and executing it, taking
money from one hand and
putting in the other as you both fundraise and prove out your strategy by deploying capital... and forget having an income for
at least a year.
Previously, only accredited investors — wealthy people with an annual income of more than $ 200,000 or a net worth of
at least $ 1 million — were allowed to
put money into such risky ventures.
At the very
least, you could be
putting your
money into mutual funds that will slowly and steadily build up your savings.
If you can not do that,
at least put enough
money into it to get your full employer match.
and yeah, as we saw in regards to CDOs, sometimes even the big heads who structure those vehicles don't really understand them (but
at least they are usually smart enough not to
put their own
money in it).
The Vision Fund is planning to
put money into
at least two separate Chinese startups.
For instance, no financial expert ever said «go
put all your
money into Snapchat stock» —
at least not to the everyday investor.
If there is an uncertain future,
at the very
least,
put in
money that you could flush down the toilet and not bat an eye about.
The banks should be nationalized,
at least temporarily, and every person and institution involved (otherwise known as the elite banksters and politicians who served and supported the government and «quasi» government decisions) in each of the bailouts and heists of the taxpayer's (i.e. the «common» mans)
money, should be divested of their personal assets and earnings and
put in a stockade for public viewing, smack dab in the middle of Wall Street, to be pelted with rotten vegetables.
Whereas in the case of long - term investing, you need to
put aside some serious
money to make
at least something from your investment.
A new survey shows that most Americans may not know their net worth or have a spending plan to help them meet their savings goals, but
at least the majority of people in this country are
putting some
money away.
«Insist on paying interest
at a rate of
at least what your family member / friend would earn if he
put the
money in a high - yield savings account,» Dearing suggests.
Often, it falls back on the hearer to not allow themselves to be controlled or manipulated,
at least to an extent where it is unhealthy for them... and each one of us has to discover where that line is for ourselves (I'm still learning to say «no, I can't do that» and I'm still learning to not
put more
money in the offering plate because the pastor told us he's preached 47 Sundays in a row without a vacation).
I'll say this for the middle - east nutjobs that blow themselves up in the name of the prophet: they
at least put their
money where their mouth is.
I think only barca real or Bayern can tempt those players away from leicester, they would give
at least a year to the club, but season after that they will move onto other club depending on their form next season.As for arsenal transfer i wouldn't want to listen to rumours as most of the times these rumours are just utter garbage.i want a certain rumour about Wolfsburg signing giroud to be true.Anyways if our idiotic manager has some sense left in him after an embarrassing season he should get a premium striker which the club needed for past 4 years.He need to
put his ego aside and his old philosophy of waiting for players to develop.We need already established players in every department of our team.Penny pinching has cost us just pay the damn
money get the players.I get the feeling next season is going to be harder and we have less chance of winning cause man city have had 2 seasons without premier league and guardiola is gonna bring more quality and hunger to that team.
That model doesn't seem to be compatible with winning the big stuff, but
at least it's
putting money in some people's pockets.
It is crucial that we don't slip up though and we need
at least one of strikers to find his scoring boots and I'm going to
put my
money on Theo Walcott coming good today, maybe assisted by Olivier Giroud?
You know Hafiz you have a strong point there, for a team that's had the same manager for almost 2 decades we should be
putting in some world class performances on a regular (
putting money aside) we should
at least be the masters of tactics since we went through such a financial constraint.
I'm
putting my
money on Petr Cech restricting Bayern to a single goal, while Sanchez and Walcott will score three between them,
at least!
Looks like Stan likes to kill animals ah wat
money does to people they just get bored and cum up with stupid tv prog go kill animals makes me mad and sad and to think our club is ran by this man no wonder we are we're we are besides
putting cash into tv, Stan get ur cash and give ozil and Sanchez and ox the
money they want if doesn't do it go get bale that's wat real owner does and if Sanchez refuses da offer get the guys killing animals on ur programme to go hunting Sanchez sick being
put down like how are spurs ahead of us there building now we're passed that we should be in champions league semis
at least I don't no if it's wenger or da owner but
at Highbury when mr drink was around we had 13 world class players and Highbury now emirates we have maybe 3 or 4 or 5 tops, world class players and guess wat we can't even keep them oh my dear friends it don't feel rite I find myself losing my arsenal my life I can not believe spurs are above us and how we use tear them to shreds our kids use ta, who cares if Sanchez goes we will not win da league with Stan there he just wants pump cash in to shooting poor animals well to me ur the animal and ur taking a sleeping giant in to the jungle?
at least a fraction of the fans
money + those of the club moguls is
put into visible use for all to see, but
at Arsenal, it's a different ball game.......
With players like Mesut Ozil in the team and with Arsene Wenger finally starting to make the big
money transfer moves, Alexis would
at the very
least expected the Gunners to
put up a decent challenge for the Premier League title.
Which of these two is the most unlikely to happen might seem obvious, with my plan having
at least two big obstacles in the way, but I would not
put any more
money on Arsenal signing this highly priced and much sought after striker.
I like giroud... I think he's a good player... but as gooners, we need to ask ourselves «against tough or defensive teams, where u get only 2 - 3 clear cut chances all game, can u
put ur
money on giroud to score
at least 1???»
I would REALLY hate to see him playing for City this year, I mean REALLY hate it, but pragmatically if he stays we're missing out on big
money that could be used to land 1 - 2 quality players (in theory
at least, we same incapable of actually closing deals lately), he's going to wind up
at City almost for sure next year, and the likely and eventual clear knowledge of this is going to make it hard for the fans to support him (to
put it mildly) and be a major distraction to the team and chemistry.
he has been holding the club back now for
at least 5 years and he is i am sorry to say an expert in failure as maureen so aptly
put it... wenger out is the only true slogan of arsenal FC supporters if that costs 16m to cover his remaining contract it would be
money well spent
This is a decent article, yet the negatives from fans are still there, I would love to see arsenal like I did
at the end of the 90's and
at the beggining of the 2nd millennium but it doesn't mean in order to do so I would buy all the best players in world, I would get a rich owner to
put his filthy
money in, change the manager every 2 years to do so, there's so much wrong in football nowadays that yes it's still a sport but there's more focus on the filthy amounts of
money being spent on clubs and players that I think attracts more attention than the game itself, now that is wrong and it's very wrong, even our owner though not like the arabs or Russians, yet the yank is clueless about the tradition of our game, it's just sad, so the fact that Wenger has remained for this long through all these changes that have occurred whilst the
money game has elvolved, it makes me happy that arsenal do not spend stupid amounts of
money on players, we don't try and buy the league, hell we even tight with wages and transfer fees, I'm glad it's like that, though our season ticket is a rip off I still don't mind it because
at least we are not like the other supreme teams, there's a bit of tradition left
at our club, yet you go to man shitty or Chelski, there is no tradition, it's all about buying ur way all the way to the top, on the other hand spuds don't know what to make of them besides how the heck have they finished above us?
At least put yourself in a position that if someone wants him because we got him back to his best, that we can make some
money of a sale.
The news comes as QPR continue negotiations with Mark Hughes about succeeding Neil Warnock as manager, with the hope that a new boss can reignite the fortunes of Taarabt, who has been on the fringes this term, having fired the R's to promotion from the Championship the season before.A deal with French
money bags Paris Saint - Germain looked like going through in the summer, but Taarabt later blamed political differences for the transfer ultimately collapsing, leaving him frustrated
at having to stay in England.The mercurial Moroccan has interest from a host of top European clubs, but his conduct in the last few months, including walking out of QPR's 1 - 0 win over Chelsea
at half - time and consistently admitting he wants to leave, have left many questioning his attitude and professionalism.However, Qatari side Al - Sadd have not been
put off, and made their move for Taarabt last week, only to pull out of a deal after being told it would take a whopping # 15 million to convince them to sell.That sort of figure also rules out Newcastle and Aston Villa as potential destinations, with the thought now that QPR will hang on to Taarabt until
at least the summer, where they hope Taarabt could spark a bidding war, after being rejuvenated under a new manager and firing the club to Premier League safety.
The renewed PAC, will help build on this momentum and
at the very
least,
put some much - needed
money behind their message of a worthy alternative.
Haber, 49, who largely self - financed his county executive campaign, said he would
put at least $ 79,500 of his own
money into the race — the annual salary of a state senator.
«I think there's a moral objective to make sure that
money is,
at least in substantial part,
put back into solving the housing needs of the state.»
Mahoney
put together a spreadsheet on the amount of
money spent by counties, other local governments, and state agencies (such as SUNY schools and IDAs) spent since 2009, coming up with a total of
at least $ 5.6 million.
Dinowitz, however, thought the city should
at least put some extra
money into mass transit to cover the MTA's subway rescue plan.
Now we have a recovery of some of the
money,
at least, that was
put into the facility and the promise of 200 jobs and $ 20 million in investment.
You sort of feel once you finish the Ph.D., that it's time to start earning some proper
money, but you have to
put that on hold,
at least at the beginning.»
On
at least seven occasions, from the early 1980s to the 2001 recession, the Fed has managed to suck the
money it had
put into the economy back out through issuing bonds.
I joined first met with the highest expectations, paid the first month and never got a single real world contact.no phone numbers, no email, even though I
put my phone number out to a dozen women im not a slob, i think if this was legit, id have got
at least a call or email.a real waste of time and
money.
Time — And while you can't
put a price on love, you can
at least try to spend your
money on dating sites in the smartest way possible.
all these film have
at least 80 % of the forums
putting their
money on them.
In half the states it would take a teacher
at least 25 years for him or her to break even and have a pension with a value greater than the amount of
money the teacher
put into it.
So when MINI take the time and trouble — and spend a decent amount of
money — to
put together a video celebrating the MINI family and where it's
at at the start of 2011, the
least we can do is let you all see it.
Technically, an indie can
put a book out without spending a dime (though hiring an editor,
at the
least, is recommended), meaning that even 99 - cent ebooks can result in tidy profits, whereas traditional publishers must
put a lot more
money into the process and can't afford price points like that,
at least not in the long run.
Before long, Geraci was able to use those businesses to launder
money and give wiseguys something to
put on their tax returns —
at least until the time came to bust the place out.
At least that way, people who look at reviews before buying something would have an idea if the reviewer actually put down money on the book in questio
At least that way, people who look
at reviews before buying something would have an idea if the reviewer actually put down money on the book in questio
at reviews before buying something would have an idea if the reviewer actually
put down
money on the book in question.
It has turned down
at least two proposals from Amazon that would have
put money into the hands of the authors.