Sentences with phrase «putting issues before the court»

What Steve does so well is to put these issues before the court of public opinion.
Trustees and their advisers will need to give careful thought to the potential costs implications of putting issues before the court for determination, particularly where those issues arise against a background of disagreement between beneficiaries and the trustees.
The situation is in flux though, and the proliferation of small inexpensive drones is putting the issue before the courts again.

Not exact matches

In this most recent case the City of Burnaby was trying to get the support of the Supreme Court of British Columbia for an issue that it had already lost before the NEB and which, to put it in neutral terms, had failed to attract the interest of the Federal Court of Appeal.
«He however, will like to put it on record that the facts of the substantial matter are not before the Supreme Court since the apex court was only invited to rule on some preliminary issues in the process of commencing the tCourt since the apex court was only invited to rule on some preliminary issues in the process of commencing the tcourt was only invited to rule on some preliminary issues in the process of commencing the trial.
The main reason sources say the prospects for the legislation are dim is because Senate Democratic leaders have decided to try to put immigration reform first on the agenda, and after that there likely won't be an appetite for another politically divisive issue before November's election — especially with a Supreme Court nomination ahead and a desire to stay focused on the politically potent issue of jobs.
Dasuki has been put on trial before Justice Baba Yusuf and another charge was filed against him before Justice Peter Affem both of the FCT High Court on the same issue and subject.
The main reason sources say the prospects for the legislation are dim is because Senate Democratic leaders have decided to try to put immigration reform first on the agenda, and after that there likely won't be an appetite for another politically divisive issue before November's election — especially with a Supreme Court nomination ahead and a desire to stay focused on the politically potent issue of jobs.
However, if you find it difficult to reach an agreement, have a lot of issues to resolve, or need to have things put before a court, it can take much longer - sometimes up to 2 years.
The issue before the Court is whether the appellant, NNPC, should have to put up a further $ 100m security in the English enforcement proceedings, as a condition of being entitled to advance a good arguable defence that enforcement should be refused under the Arbitration Act 1996, s 103 (3).
Many cases are settled before proceedings are issued; the CPR encourages solicitors to deal with cases by negotiation, and Court proceedings are only used if the Defendant will not put forward a reasonable offer, or the appropriate limitation period is about to expire.
The question put before the Court was whether competition law applies to such arrangements, which quite clearly have a social aim and seek to address the increasingly common issue of the «false self - employed» in today's society.
The Chief Justice of Canada, the Right Honourable Beverley McLachlin, addressed the latter in her recent lecture to the Canadian Bar Association, but I do not perceive that she or anyone else in the legal community have addressed the fundamental issue that the SRL phenomenon raises: the right to participate in the making of common law; the ability to put a set of interests before the courts that hitherto have not been able to afford to be there — and thus, a rather significant challenge to the validity of the whole body of common law as it stands.
Those matters were not in issue before the court or put to those concerned.
Whilst it was correct that there was no such evidence before the Commercial Court, in fact criminal proceedings had been opened in Ukraine by the time of the hearing, and shortly afterwards Khrapunov was put on an international wanted list and an Interpol red notice was issued for his arrest.
I won't comment on locus standi too much here; suffice it to say that the General Court put a rather large cart before a potentially even larger horse by skipping the admissibility issue altogether in the present case and dealing with the substantive issues head on («for the sake of the economy of the procedure»).
Ultimately, I believe judges should emulate Justice Knazan the next time they are faced with a case that centres around Twitter (or Facebook, snapchat, kik, WhatsApp, LinkedIn, tumblr, instagram, Tinder, etc...) and put it to the participants in the matter to explain how the platform works, why the evidence should be accepted and what relevance any of it has to the legal issue before the court.
He introduced the case by putting the issue very simply «The question before this Court concerns the steps which are required as a matter of UK domestic law before the process of leaving the European Union can be initiated.»
George, [2007] O.J. No. 120: 8 With respect to the issue contested before me, as to the kinds of evidence appropriately put forward on the s. 810 application, I am guided by the Court of Appeal decision in R. v. Budreo.
Nonetheless, caution should be exercised in relying on these cases as precedent as the issue has not been put before the Court of Appeal in either province, and there is conflicting precedents in other jurisdictions.
Rather, Peter raises the same issues as were raised in the pending proceedings, that is, whether the power of attorney and will executed by Karl and put before the court by Arnold have been the product of undue influence or were signed in suspicious circumstances.
Men's issues need to be put before the court and recognized by their significant others, mothers, children, and opposing counsel, who are all part of the equation when involved in the family law system.
Judicial responses to alienation include: ordering an assessment; ordering supervised access on a permanent basis; intervention in the early stages of the dispute, before the problem has had time to become «true» alienation, or in the early years of a child's development; changing custody on a temporary basis; determining whether «pure» or «mixed» alienation is taking place; keeping the courts involved; suggesting counselling; making a finding of contempt; making a no - contact order; involving the Children's Aid Society; not making a parallel parenting order; meeting with the children; and in extreme cases, putting the alienating parent's actions on court record, in hopes that if the child revisits the issue as an adult, they may be able to see what actually took place.
1.9 The guideline recognises the Court's ability to make suitable orders is limited to issues, based on evidence, which have been put before it by the parents and / or an Independent Children's Lawyer as to why a particular order should or should not be made.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z