These could only be the reasons not to
put the model output in the garbage bin without further examination.
Not exact matches
While the
Model S may not be
putting out as much power as the
Model X, Drag Times says it has heard reports that
Model S cars using the latest firmware, newer than what its car had, have been recording power
outputs of up to 67 HP more than older P90D cars.
The real «reforms,» here, pertained to the extent to which value - added
model (VAM) or other growth
output were combined with these observational measures, and the extent to which districts adopted state - level observational
models as per the centralized educational policies
put into place at the same time.
The base
model puts out 345 hp and 369 lb - ft of torque to the rear wheels, while the sportier 2014 Maserati Ghibli S Q4 raises
output to 404 hp and 406 lb - ft of torque and adds all - wheel drive.
That
puts that
model head - to - head with the 400 - hp Porsche 911 Carrera S. Down the line, a higher
output engine for an AMG GT Black Series could
put out up to 600 hp, which could conceivably compete with the 560 - hp 911 Turbo S. For now Mercedes - Benz will not build a roadster version of the AMG sport coupe, but it's not impossible that one could arrive in the future.
The result is expected to be around 480 hp, which would
put the Audi RS
models» power
output a bit above the 425 - hp BMW M3 and the 469 - hp Mercedes - AMG C63, but not quite as high as the 503 - hp S version of the AMG C63.
Ford claims this will be the most powerful Expedition yet,
putting output at greater than the outgoing
model's 365 hp, but the company has not released specific horsepower figures.
Key rivals from Mercedes and Audi
put out 355 horsepower and 340 horsepower, respectively, so the BMW X1 M's
output would have to be in this neighborhood for the performance
model to make sense.
Those would
put strict constraints on any computational
model, one could literally test
model output against them.
Now scientists have concluded this century, that this natural variation «weather» signal can be large enough to
put a significant mismatch between
model output and current decadal temperature record.
Why don't you suggest a test, and we'll
put your statistical
model up against the GCM
output and we'll see who has the best match against the 20th C data.
However, it is still not enough to recognize that it alone likely
puts their entire computer
model output in question.
That number is the
output of a
model, computed from the area under a curve
put out in the device, and an equation relating such areas to actual (accurately but not perfectly known) test concentrations.
The arguments
put forward are that climate
models, which produce
output at a wide range of spatial and temporal scales, but it is claimed that the only become skillful at global scale with 30 - year temporal resolution.
Operational Weather Forecasting covers the whole process of forecast production, from understanding the nature of the forecasting problem, gathering the observational data with which to initialise and verify forecasts, designing and building a
model (or
models) to advance those initial conditions forwards in time and then interpreting the
model output and
putting it into a form which is relevant to customers of weather forecasts.
You may
put them elsewhere, but the default search location for
output files is in the C - ROADS - CP /
MODEL folder.
Personally I've gotten to the point where I don't
put much stock in the
outputs of any of these
models, including the reanalysis efforts.
Putting that aside then, I suspect that the critical point you are not addressing is that a climate
model itself produces
outputs that are statistical in nature i.e. they contain uncertainty.
Either
put in the full envelope of
model output over the same period, or just plot the trends and their uncertainty for the 8 year period.
Regarding releasing supporting code and data and paper in one package, I've amused myself for quite some time playing with the interactive pages that Dr. Hansen and other GISS researchers often
put up alongside their papers e.g. http://data.giss.nasa.gov/modelE/transient/dangerous.html ISTR another where one could tweak forcings and plot the
output from GISS
Model E, for those without the time to download and compile the fortran..., but a quick Google doesn't find it.