You would essentially be
putting more federal money toward education, rather than less.
Not exact matches
«The chances of economic growth slowing a lot in an environment where the
federal government is literally
putting a lot
more money to work in the economy is pretty low.»
And instead of
more details, it effectively punted, saying that the state would at some point
put in
money, but only after the MTA spent down its contributions from the city and
federal government.
«The state has no legal obligation, so we are
putting more money on the table than either the city or the
federal government — but I want the
money spent!»
As a result of this legislation, over 350,000 education - related jobs were saved, state governments devised ambitious plans to compete for $ 4 billion in «Race to the Top» grants, and the
federal government
put forth solutions to the problems faced by the nation's weakest schools But the long - term impact of the stimulus
money is much
more unclear, according to a nationwide review led by the Hechinger Institute on Education and the Media and the Education Writers Association.
One way forward for simplification and increases in the productivity of the
federal investment is to make social programs intended to support lower income families with children
more like tax expenditures —
putting more money directly in the hands of parents to spend on the care and development of their children and less
money directly in the financial accounts of states, welfare agencies, and social service providers.
Present plans for
federal tax cuts and reforms are predicated, in part, on helping families by directly
putting more money in their pockets.
In addition to lowering your utility bills and making you
more comfortable, a
more efficient home may end up
putting free
money in your pocket, thanks to local, state and
federal rebates.
Bush is also a strong proponent of
putting more money back into the pockets of taxpayers through cuts in
federal income, capital gains, and estate taxes, all positions backed by NAR.
On the surface, doubling the standard deduction and retaining MID might seem to
put more money into the pockets of many middle - income households without compromising the
federal government's historic commitment to home ownership.
Aggressive
Federal Reserve policies created the most favorable interest rates in a generation, resulting in, among other things, an unprecedented national wave of home refinancing that
put significantly
more money in the pockets of New York - area consumers —
money they were willing to spend.