Sentences with phrase «putting tar»

The report also describes other market forces that are putting tar sand developers at a growing disadvantage.
Have I written about the Japanese researchers many years ago who put tar (a known carcinogen) on rabbits» ears to induce cancer?
The report puts tar sands development lost revenue at $ 30.9 billion from 2010 through 2013, in part due to the changing North American oil market but largely because of a fierce grassroots movement against tar sands development.
Put tar down for the starter strip to hold it down for high winds as well as nails.

Not exact matches

We believe that it threatens our sovereignty and puts control of our natural resources such as the Tar Sands and water at risk.
While federal panjandrums argue that the tar sands may be key to our economic prosperity, our politicians couldn't put aside their partisan views long enough to complete a national report on the project's formidable water liabilities.
Unfortunately, I have been «stripped, whipped, tarred and feathered and run out of town on a rail» by my own family members for simply STATING that if I found out, or «heard a whisper of a finger being laid on my niece» who was going to stay with my abuser and his enabler, I «would go to the authorities and this time I would and legally could have him put in jail.»
great saying... for those that enjoy beating the tar out of the children that are put in their care.
At Easter we put together pageants and invite outsiders to come and watch Jesus get the tar beat out of Him for their sins.
Star guard Kendall Marshall suffered a fractured wrist in the Tar Heels» win over Creighton, putting his status in the NCAA Tournament going forward in doubt.
The Tar Heels (3 — 1, 1 — 1) put the wood to favored Rutgers 44 — 12 on national TV on Sept. 11, then nearly beat Virginia Tech the following weekend, losing 20 — 17.
I take off my Tar Heel hat and put it into a nearby trash can, quickly, while nobody was watching.
While UNC has the only other prediction for the IMG Academy prospect, Ross Martin, a contributor the Tar Heels» 247sports site, put in a Crystal Ball the Wolverines way recently:
Ill probably get tarred and feathered by the Arsenal armchair experts out there for stating this but I wouldn't mind seeing Wenger putting in a cheeky $ 30 - 35 million bid for both Wanyama and Mane from Southampton.
It's like someone took tar and mixed it with glue and then put in some fudge.
Left wing sources immediately labeled him «right wing» and aidded by the friends in mass media successfully tarred Republicans and specifically Sarah Palin with it (even putting that into Wikipedia).
The craziest treatment I did was one where they put coal tar all over your body and wrap you in plastic.
Sola winds up being Carter's closest ally after Tars; he's put into her care immediately following his entrance into Thark society, and she winds up going from being his guard to ultimately becoming a sort of sidekick and companion.
The trailer for the fifth film in the «kids cheat death» series is out and it shows what happens when you mess with death and then put yourself in the path of lasers and hot tar, or settle down for a nice acupuncture session.
«Compared to other states, North Carolina has a pretty good fiscal capacity for spending — but it isn't spending its money on public schools,» said Molly Hunter, director of the ELC's Education Justice program, noting that the Tar Heel state was very last in terms of the «effort» it put into school funding.
You glide over tar marks in the road but will have to put up with some body lean and sway in corners and turns that you wouldn't experience in the smaller Regal sedan with Dynaride.
«We did this out of a love for our own family pets, because when you think about it, would you put a coal tar treatment on your child?
After layering tar paper, tar, foil sheets, and aluminum paint to make a «malleable canvas,» as McCloud puts it, he then heats the surface with a blowtorch and hammers decorative patterns into it using a woodblock.
The IPCC TAR puts the odds that the world will cool from 1990 to 2030 at MUCH less than 1 %.
James Annan writes, «My quick and dirty estimate above based on the IPCC TAR suggests that they would put the probability (of cooling) at more like 10 %, so his offer actually appears to affirm the IPCC position.»
There will also be a massive rally outside the White House put on by Tar Sands Action on Nov 6, one year from the election.
The key issue here — far larger than the debate over a 17 % or an 84 % excess emissions per [barrel] of tar sands oil vs. light sweet crude — is highlighted by, [but] not put into full energy and climate context by, the compelling and depressing Charles Homans Foreign Policy article [link].
The spill and its aftermath has not just shaken an Arkansas town, but has also sparked continued debate over the controversial tar sands oil and how transporting this oil via pipelines puts communities and the climate at risk.
Environmentalists argue that the U.S. president needs to take a stand against further development of tar sands oil, which is more carbon - intensive than conventional crude oil, and will put the world on what they call an unsustainable energy path.
As Sir John Houghton, co-chair of TAR Working Group I, once put it: «Any move to reduce political involvement in the IPCC would weaken the panel and deprive it of its political clout....
This announcement will effectively kill the Northern Gateway tar sands pipeline proposal, which would have shipped half a million barrels of tar sands through British Columbia's Great Bear Rainforest, putting important salmon rivers, coastal rainforests, and sensitive marine waters at risk.
An interesting question is also put to Dr Pachauri of the IPCC in regard to why Mann was allowed to insert his own research into the TAR and why there was no independent audit of his work.
So, when Mann loses, it will show that «global warming» is wrong and every single climate academic from Hansen to Curry to Jones to Spencer will be tarred with the same brush as having been found guilty of â $ ¦ how to put this «it being reasonable to suggest fraud».
Put your savings and investments to work for climate solutions, not supporting coal and oil corporations, tar sands mining, fracking and pipelines.
The first step to putting our country on the path to addressing the climate crisis is for President Obama to reject the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline.
Right now, Congress is getting ready to vote on legislation to fast - track the Keystone XL pipeline — a project that would drive a rapid expansion of tar sands operations and put the lives of thousands of wolves at risk.
From a brief check, it looks like their Unix boxes output gzip files and tar files, and the PCs appear to be windows based putting out zip files.
With signs asking to keep tar sands in the ground cheekily blending with the orange party signs on both sides of Thomas Mulcair, and with folks interrupting his speech again and again with questions from within the crowd, they put pressure on Mulcair so as to clarify his position on Energy East.
The details will eventually come out, but it looks like another case of Keystone Cops running around like chickens with their heads cut off while they try to keep us safe from the inevitable ruination that results when you try to put corrosive tar sands crude in a pipeline.
They now know that the pipeline would only generate 35 permanent full time positions, while putting America's breadbasket at risk of spills in order to get tar sands to ports where most will be refined and exported internationally.
«An overwhelming objection is that the exploitation of tar sands would make it implausible to stabilize climate and avoid disastrous global climate impacts... governments are acting as if they are oblivious to the fact that there is a limit on how much fossil fuel carbon we can put into the air.»
Amanda Starbuck, the Climate Program Director at Rainforest Action Network, put it this way: «Many big corporations that sell commodities far removed from oil extraction are nonetheless enabling the nightmarish expansion of the tar sands by refusing to purge tar sands oil from their fuel supply chains.
For example, Earthjustice represents four U.S. tribes in an effort to block a massive tar sands pipeline in Canada that would put treaty fishing areas at risk of catastrophic oil spills.
Hockey stick (from memory, please anyone correct): the graph in question was put forward in a peer - reviewed paper in 1998 and quickly became the poster - child of the AGW community, including a prominent role in the IPCC TAR in 2001, thus helping influence the whole world towards irrational climate change alarmism.
«This letter puts the biggest corporate consumers of oil on notice that there's no excuse not to invest in cleaner, more efficient fleets, and that it's simply wrong to source oil from the tar sands, which is fouling the land and water in communities across the country, from Maine to Kalamazoo to Utah.»
To put this in perspective, the Keystone XL pipeline would carry up to 830,000 barrels of heavy tar sands oil per day (303 million barrels / year), enough to supply the energy for over 38 million cars, or the equivalent of 1.8 QBtu annually.
However, reducing the demand for fossil fuels on the other hand would lower the price of oil and put a cap on tar sand production.
(1) Putting aside actual so - called fossil carbon (i.e. shales, coal, oil, gas tar sands) which are all relatively unreactive geologically overall (unless those pesky humans dig them up and burn them) there are in fact (today) substantial pools of potentially more reactive «fixed» carbon other than the active biosphere's biomass.
Tar sands crude oil pipeline comanies may be putting the American public's safety at risk by using conventional pipeline technology to transport a highly corrosive, acidic and potentially unstable blend of thick raw bitumen and volatile natural gas liquid condensate called DilBit.
If the oil industry wants to pipe these dangerous tar sands oils over our water sheds and aquifers, putting our drinking supply and neighborhoods at risk, they should not only be required to pay into the cleanup fund, they should be paying far more than the 8 cents per barrel they pay for conventional oil since these tar sands oils are not just worse for the environment, but potentially pose a greater risk of spills and are even harder to clean up.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z