Sentences with phrase «q p r»

That, s what, s lacking in west hams statement, s, Q P R stated we are going all out for the win.

Not exact matches

Moderate interest rates were associated with a whole range of subsequent returns over the following decade, and we know that those outcomes were 90 % correlated with the level of valuations at the beginning of those periods (on reliable measures such as market cap / GDP, price / revenue, Tobin's Q, the margin - adjusted Shiller P / E, and others we've presented over time - see Ockham's Razor and the Market Cycle).

Not least because the Shiller p / e is, at 25, well above the historical average and other market indicators (like the Q ratio) are pointing the same way.

MarketCap / GVA is better correlated with actual subsequent S&P 500 total returns than price / forward earnings, the Fed Model, the Shiller P / E, price / book, price / dividend, Tobin's Q, market capitalization to GDP, price / revenue and every other valuation ratio we've developed or examined in market cycles across history.

From then on, rather than being solely a function of the money supply it was held that the general price level was determined by the money supply multiplied by the velocity of money in accordance with the famous Equation of Exchange (M * V = P * Q) **.

However, the Vanitygen Cash readme explains that the first character for custom BCH addresses should be the letter Q, and the second character should be either p, q, r, or zQ, and the second character should be either p, q, r, or zq, r, or z.

These days, Obama's too busy with unconstitutional violations of his cherished Obamacare law and dodging responsibility for the IRS political persecutions that just happened to begin the week after he met with an IRS chief to be bothered with the p's and q's of violating some 1982 law that Harry Reid wants ignored.

The key point is this: The relation feels induces the following relation between the phases of a nexus: Let P and Q be phases in a nexal set N. Q is later than P when the following two conditions hold: (1) p and Q are not identicalP and Q be phases in a nexal set N. Q is later than P when the following two conditions hold: (1) p and Q are not identicalP when the following two conditions hold: (1) p and Q are not identicalp and Q are not identical.

The repetition of a n q r w p o x (seven times in vv.

But of course that is a confusion; it confuses an argument that P and Q are consistent with the very different enterprise of explaining Q, given the truth of P.

In the particular case at hand, p is God is omnipotent, omniscient, and wholly good and q is there is evil.

All it needs to be is consistent with p and such that in conjunction with p it entails q; and if there is such a proposition r, then p and q are consistent.

(2) Each actual entity that is in Q but not in P feels an actual entity in P

Again, the principle of sufficient reason is not congruent with the most elementary logical truths, for instance that propositions may be such that one proposition, p, implies the other, q, but not conversely; or they may be mutually independent.

I think the worst thing we do while professing to be Christians is not minding our p's and q's.

read the quran now on... q u r a n e x p l o r e r.

From the moment that an adult first gets his hands on us we are neurologically wired to learn that deeds P, Q, and R are correct and required, while X, Y, and Z are incorrect and to be avoided.

I am so incredibly tired, as a north american (leave christianity out of this), of having to watch my p's and q's amongst the radically inclined newcomers to our countries.

This is simply modus ponens (i.e., the first part of a theorem or axiom is dropped when we have «P and P Q, implying Q»).

Aside from the symbolization of elementary propositions — p, q, r — the fundamental notions explained are: assertion I -.

This can be formulated as modus tollens in propositional logic: P implies Q, but Q is false, therefore P is false.

Since «p or not - p» must be true, it is meaningless to say, «q might be necessary but is not,» when «necessary» is taken in the sense of «upon tautological conditions.»

Don't forget to make a voodoo effigy of Joseph Smith and poke his backside with a vaseline covered q - tip, this figuratively represents the virtual ass r a p e in reverse.

Suppose someone were thinking through the chain of reasoning in the following syllogism: -LSB-(P Q) & P] Q.

25 For they exchanged the truth of God for [p] a lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed [q] forever.

Such information as the fact that dancer P forgets his right from his left occasionally will be prehended, at a subconscious level most likely, by his corner dancer Q.

For instance, in the case of the Brusselator, there is a single steady - state solution if the concentrations of reactants (A and B) is not large, 13 relative to the concentrations of products (P and Q).

The concentrations of A, B, P, and Q are held at constant values throughout the system for a single experiment, but these values can be varied from one experiment to another.

In cases for which reactant and product (A, B, P, Q) concentrations are not held constant but are allowed to follow the usual (nonlinear) equations which govern ordinary diffusion, development of spatial order is to be expected, if the chemical equations of the Brusselator apply.

Somehow, these products must leave the system, if the concentrations of P and Q are to remain constant.

In the Brusselator, for instance, reactants (A and B) are continually supplied and converted to the products (P and Q).

The first point to be noticed is that the formula does not purport to express a convention — let «p q» mean «it is not the case that p is true and q is false» — but rather what is actually meant by the term «God» in the thought of a believer.

To get the Christian god in you remove premise y and add p, q, r, s, and m. I would argue that the premises that must be dropped for people to accept the Christian god are premises they don't really want to drop and so work with an unballanced set of beliefs.

So, if you're a blogger, go ahead and link up your recipes featuring a fruit, vegetable, grain, or bean starting with the lettrs P, Q, or R. And, if you'd like to be updated with each month's letters (not that they're too difficult to figure out), you can sign up here.

Q: Dear Dave: It is one thing to have your soil tested but it is another to find good info on how much N, P, K you need for peppers.

This month we were to showcase a recipe using a fruit, vegetable or grain that begin with the letters P, Q, or R. Again, I had way too many ideas for this one, but since I love pumpkin, especially in muffins, this recipe was perfect!

Whether or not drivers choose to mind their P's and Q's during Sunday's STP Gas Booster 500 (1:00 p.m. ET, FOX) is anybody's guess — but the tight quarters of Martinsville likely won't extinguish any fiery tempers.

When I go to the proverbial vicars tea party — or am in the company of non sport minded folk — I mind my P's and Q's.

Have I forgotten someone really good who is a must for the P / Q team?

So far I've picked ten teams, «B», «C», «D», «F», «S», a combined «G» and «H», a combined «J», «K» and «L», a combined «M» and «N», a combined «P» and «Q», and «Vowels».

So far I've picked eleven teams, «B», «C», «D», «F», «S», a combined «G» and «H», a combined «J», «K» and «L», a combined «M» and «N», a combined «P» and «Q», a combined «R» and «T», and «Vowels».

How dare they invade your body by making sure your uterus is minding it's P's and Q's?

In B, the P and Q values are as follows: exclusively breasfed vs combination fed (P =.02; Q =.04), combination fed vs exclusively formula fed (P =.52; Q =.52), and exclusively breastfed vs exclusively formula fed (P =.04; Q =.04).

Overall stool microbiome community composition was characterized using generalized UniFrac analysis.30 Controlling for the effects of feeding method, delivery mode was strongly associated with infant gut microbiome composition (P <.001; Q <.001)(Figure 1A).

Feeding was associated with differential abundance in Lactococcus (P <.001; Q =.002), which was depleted in exclusively breastfed infants compared with those who were exclusively formula fed (Figure 3B).

Vaginal delivery (vs cesarean delivery) was associated with increased abundance of Bacteroides (P <.001; Q =.02) and Pectobacterium (P =.001; Q =.02) and with decreased abundance of Staphylococcus (P =.001; Q =.02), Rothia (P =.006; Q =.07), and Propionibacterium (P =.01; Q =.009) in infant stool, after adjustment for feeding method (Figure 3A).

In pairwise comparisons of the 3 feeding methods, exclusive breastfeeding was associated with a microbiome community distinct from that of infants who were either exclusively formula fed (P =.04; Q =.05) or fed a combination of breast milk and formula prior to stool collection (P =.02; Q =.04).

Another analysis was conducted for ever vs never breastfed, including 14 studies because 3 studies did not have data for never breastfed.18, 41,43 The definition of never breastfed differed among studies, with some defining never as no and some as less than 1 month; therefore, between - study heterogeneity was significantly higher (Cochran - Q = 38; P <.01; I2 = 65.8 %; 95 % CI, 30.8 % -79.2 %).

When -LRB-(2 ^ 3) ^ 4) ^ 5, 2 ^ -LRB-(3 ^ 4) ^ 5) and 2 ^ (3 ^ (4 ^ 5)-RRB- are each divided by 13, the remainders are respectively p, q and r.

Sections in (A, B, P, and Q), (C — J), and (K — N) are of stage 46, 50, and 54 tadpoles, respectively.