Sentences with phrase «quad core seemed»

In limited hands - on testing I noted that the processor, while a 1.4 GHz dual core instead of a 1.7 GHz quad core seemed to manage well enough.

Not exact matches

The new Moto G, which Motorola seems to be calling just The New Moto G, comes with a 5 - inch 720p display, powered by a 1.2 GHz quad - core processor.

Powered by a quad core, 2700 MHz, Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 processor, the Nexus 6 should still be comparable the 8 - core, 1900 MHz ARM processor found in the Galaxy Note 4 — though on paper Apple's processor seems quite a bit behind both devices by only being dual core and 1400 MHz.

For the moment, it seems like Dell is winning in this particular arena, but the rest of the tablet looks pretty decent as well — boasting a screen resolution of 2560 × 1600, RealSense digital photography technology (that is able to create a depth map of an image, giving a rudimentary understanding of object positions located across 3D space instead of only a 2D plane), and an Intel Z3500 quad - core CPU (running between 1.33 GHz to 2.33 GHz depending on the model).

Everything we have heard about the LG Nexus 4 seems to be legit including its Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro quad - core processor and the 4.7 - inch display with 1280 × 768 pixel resolution.

Despite being quad - core and having an up - to - date 28nm, it seems to be geared - up for efficiency rather than raw power.

Truthfully, quad - core seems like overkill and would probably hurt battery life so I'd expected the latter.

The software also seems to run faster with the quad - core 1.6 GHz processor and updated Android 6.0 OS compared to the Onyx Boox N96.

If these numbers seem unlikely for a quad - core tablet, it's important to remember that, unlike Tegra 2, its successor is a fully scalable architecture.

There's the suggestion of a Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 processor, making for a quad - core Windows RT tablet, along with LTE support, which the pictured device seems to suggest with it's Verizon 4G LTE branding.

Other than that, both models seem to be identical featuring a 5.23 - inch display with a 960 x 480 resolution, 1 GB RAM, 16 GB storage, and a MediaTek MT6739 quad - core processor.

They seem to have been brought in on June 26 but reveal little new in way of specs, other than that it's specified with a 7 - inch screen, a quad - core processor, and possibly dual - SIM features.

In terms of what's under the hood, the S2 is powered by a 1.5 GHz dual - core Qualcomm Krait processor which, while powerful, may seem a little dated by the time the device is released, as tablets will soon be making the transition to quad - core processors.

It seems company has been hasty in trying to be the first to launch a quad core tablet and it is not turning out too well.

Apple's eventual move to a quad - core chipset in its iOS devices seems >>

In line with those specs, it will of course be powered by a quad - core processor, Qualcomm Snapdragon it seems, and have the high - end - Q3 standard of 2 GB of RAM.

Although your quad core device might not seem faster in the first few minutes after the ROM has been installed pelase be patient as it takes a while for it to accommodate the new software.

The Asus Transformer Pad TF103 uses a quad - core Intel Atom Z3745 CPU, a 64 - bit processor clocked at 1.86 GHz (the standard clock speed is 1.33 GHz, but it seems to be overclocked in this model).

Just yesterday we saw benchmark test results that seemed to confirm that the mysterious ASUS TF300T tablet would have a quad - core Tegra 3 processor inside.

My 2 year old 7» Tab 2 seems a bit long in the tooth and the battery life seems half what it was originally so I wanted to upgrade to this - now on sale just about everywhere for $ 169 - for the following reasons: Kit Kat 4.4 vs 4.2.2 (Samsung update w / no multiuser account settings) quad core vs dual core 1200x800 HD screen res vs old 1024x600 1.5 GB RAM vs 1 GB This review overall is not too good, but I like $ 169 as a price point better than last years 7» Nexus or 7» Fire HDX for $ 229.

Going by the Zauba listing, it seems Motorola has done away with the 8 GB model for Moto G2, which is rumored to feature a slightly bigger 5 - inch 720p HD display, the same Snapdragon 400 quad - core processor, 1 GB of RAM, slightly better 8MP rear camera, 2MP front camera, a microSD card slot and Android 4.4.4.

Xiaomi seems to have moved away from Qualcomm by opting for MediaTek Helio X10 processor clocked at a mighty 2.0 GHz (2 GHz quad - core Cortex A53 - 2 GHz quad - core Cortex A53) paired with a 2 GB of RAM.

Having powered by a 2.5 GHz quad - core Snapdragon 801 processor and 2 GB RAM along with 16 GB internal memory, the M810 smartphone seems to be a beast which competes with the likes of Xiaomi Mi 4 which comes at around the same price.

It might not seem to work faster than the existing quad - core Snapdragon 805 in many Galaxy Note 4 handsets, including those in the UK, but it could have an effect on battery life.

The two seem to share a modest quad - core Exynos 7570 processor, as well as 2 GB RAM, which makes us hopeful of an ultra-low Galaxy J4 (2018) price point.

With a 1.2 - GHz quad - core Snapdragon processor backed by 1 GB of RAM and 4 GB of ROM, the Pop Mega seemed snappy during my hands - on time with it.

The price of Rs. 10,999 seems good enough for a dual core handset with a 5.3 inch screen, however there are many other options and some better options to choose from, for example the Zen Mobile 701HD — quad core for Rs. 11,999.

If this ends up being basically the same model rebranded for a different market, it seems likely that its 9.7 - inch screen will boast a resolution of 2,048 by 1,536 pixels and that the aforementioned hexa - core system - on - chip is in fact the MediaTek MT8176V featuring a dual - core ARM Cortex - A72 and a quad - core ARM Cortex - A53.

The offer looks good along with 1 year screen replacement, however the handset seems pricey with quad core processor, though it might sell in offline markets as those users are basically more interested in after sales and offers.

On paper, this quad - core APU seems like a real power - house, but benchmarks turned in disappointing performance.

And the $ 50 Roku Streaming Stick, with its quad - core processor, actually seemed faster than the new $ 30 Roku Express, a tiny little box that replaces the original Roku 1 (see below for more info on that).

Seems Indian Market flooding with Budget smart phones that to with Latest Android 4.4 and Quad Core.

The whole Jelly Bean OS seemed slow and unresponsive compared to the Sony and Huawei devices we played with, leading us to question what on earth the quad - core chip and sizeable chunk of RAM was up to in the Grand S.

This seems like another MediaTek powered smartphone it is 1.3 GHz Cortex A7 quad core (the chipset is not mentioned).

ZTE G2 (with quad core and 4.5 inch IPS screen) already sells for 4500 on snapdeal hence this price of $ 100 does not seem cheap to me.

It is using MediaTek quad core processor, dual SIM, specifications are decent, however the price seems too high.

Overall, the HP15 - BA021AX powered by the AMD Quad - Core A10 - 9600P APU seems like a value for money laptop.

With a price tag as little as # 14 per month in the UK or # 134.99 (around $ 224, AU$ 240) SIM - free and a spec list that includes a quad - core CPU, 13MP camera, forward facing flash and HD screen there seems to be a lot to shout about.

Although your quad core device might not seem faster in the first few minutes after the ROM has been installed pelase be patient as it takes a while for it to accommodate the new software.

The price of Rs. 8,499 seems a bit on the higher side and one can easily get a quad core MT6589W for around the same price.

A year ago the HTC One M8 impressed us with its power as well, but its 2.3 GHz quad - core Snapdragon 801 processor seems fairly commonplace now.

While battery power seems to be the biggest focus here, it appears that the phone also will feature a 4.7 - inch 720p display, a 1.2 GHz MediaTek quad - core processor and 1 GB RAM.

Some of this comes down to better thermal handling in the Snapdragon 820 chipset: it seems for Qualcomm that the return to quad - core rather than 2015's octo - core 810 has had great results.

With a dual - core processor clocked at just 1.3 GHz, the 5s seems like it shouldn't be able to compete with the many Android smartphones on the market with quad - and eight - core processors clocked at well over 2 GHz.