Sentences with phrase «qualified scientists with»

Science Careers — 8,810 people like this — Science Careers is dedicated to being the world leader in matching qualified scientists with jobs in industry, academia, and government.

I am referring to qualified scientists with a record of scholarship who have specifically commented in the scientific literature on the question, not merely those participating in polls, think - tank policy papers, or lobbyists and advocates commenting on blogs and op - ed pages.

Other qualified scientists with no vested interest in seeing a given theory succeed or fail attempt to find flaws in the methodologies described in the source paper by replicating the processes themselves to see if they get the same results.

I am also a qualified scientist with 25 years experience in marine science and education.

Not exact matches

You should read it with the understanding that I'm a mom who has pumped a lot, but also is not a doctor or a scientist and is in no way qualified to give medical advice.

EFE This is a statement frm sm1 who is enlightened, pls d writen of d message ie Dr Biodun shld know dat they is a grp called medical Laboratory Scientist & d duty of d CMD is for d medically qualified & all professionals in d health sector are with a high degree of experience & shld also note dat b4 HE Dr Biodun was born Medicine was a deploma progam so allow other who now run degrees to do freely

To that end, AAAS, in coordination with an advisory council, will identify and coordinate ethicists and a multi-disciplinary team of highly qualified scientists who have experience conducting prevalence studies in vulnerable and marginalized populations.

«These scientists are well qualified and on par with those graduating from the top - tier schools.

«So let's recap: according to some, scientists who receive money from oil and chemical companies are perfectly qualified to provide the EPA with independent science advice, while those who receive federal grants are not,» he wrote.

So let's recap: according to some, scientists who receive money from oil and chemical companies are perfectly qualified to provide the EPA with independent science advice, while those who receive federal grants are not.

If you are a biomedical scientist with a faculty position, you technically qualify to apply for an NIH research grant.

Thus, there is tremendous room for creativity, growth, and development for qualified and highly motivated young scientists — optimally with a background in biology, medicine, or mathematics.

Well - qualified and savvy Ph.D. scientists could very likely land substantially more lucrative offers on their own, but the program serves a useful purpose by aiming to ease the way to a first industrial position for scientists unfamiliar with or intimidated by the nonacademic job market.

Often, faculty and staff scientists with different kinds of expertise partner, providing a diversity of experience that is beneficial to both the individuals and to science.1 Combining the skills and interests of a PI with those of a highly qualified staff scientist can amplify a lab's success rate and increase overall progress.

Connect with our highly qualified audience of senior scientists and researchers through educational webinars.

Lab staff are qualified scientists, many with a decade or more of DNA testing experience

Our highly qualified team of genetic scientists, doctors, and board - certified genetic counselors are on - hand to work with you and your physician to provide the latest information and guidance to make better informed therapy decisions.

«We believe in gender equality,» Soria observed, «and in partnership with the InterAmerican Network of Academies of Science, we have selected qualified women scientists to represent Ecuador and encouraged qualified women scientists to apply and join.»

Only a qualified dietician or a nutrition scientist can help you with this.

The Pet Industry Joint Advisory Council (PIJAC) is working with fishers and scientists to halt it in its tracks because the bill (a) risks jobs all across the islands, (b) is based upon activists» unscientific claims that ornamental fishing is environmentally unsound and (c) will leave divers without qualified partners — thus risking their lives.

With all due respect you are a well known (be it controversial) climate scientist but you are not the most qualified person to make that claim.

While I agree with James that looking for evidence of mendacity from Monckton is like shooting fish in a barrel with a stinger missile, unfortunately, James has decided not to name names for his «swath of well qualified and experienced scientists».

A lot of university qualified scientists disagree with you.

Scientists have to qualify in the top percentile for intellect, AND they have to work hard for decades, and fight in the court of their peers (and fashions there can get in the way as well) for their ideas, but they are not known for patience with what appears to be stupidity.

They can then link to their comments and articles, on other denialist websites, and claim credibility due to their association with a suitably well qualified climate scientist.

They didn't even take testimony from scientists qualified to address the problems with the science, yet still concluded the science was solid.

Courts make a VERY clear distinction between free speech and deliberate libel; and equating a respected scientist (respected by his peers; he doesn't need the respect of the rubes) with a most reviled pervert and convicted criminal does qualify as deliberate slander.

So, their solution is to offer a measly $ 30,000 to a member of the public to achieve a better result than large numbers of highly qualified rocket scientists with thousands of peer reviewed papers.

4) The working groups must include some qualified scientists who do not completely agree with the consensus view.

It strikes me as curious in the extreme that somebody — even someone with a climate scientists disdain for uncertainty — would not qualify this comment in terms like «the earliest comment we've yet discovered».

Simply because you feel that these seven claims qualify as «disinformation» doesn't mean that the mass of climate scientists and actual experts agree with you.

His version would be correct if the AGU's scientific go - to guy was a demented fringe politician with a journalism diploma who publishes Sudoku books instead of fifteen real and highly qualified scientists.

Among the contrarians affiliated with the site are Sallie Baliunas and Willie Soon, astronomers, lead authors of the recent «Harvard study» a survey of historical studies of climate which yields findings totally contrary to those reported by scientists who are actually qualified to study the topic.

More than a few of those «qualified denier scientists» manage to balls it up big time (comparing modern warming with GISP2 and forgetting GISP2 ends in the 19th century is a common one).

Many well qualified scientists and engineers do disagree with every one of the statements.

PRINCETON, NJ (January 3, 2011)-- S. Fred Singer said in an interview with the National Association of Scholars (NAS) that «the number of skeptical qualified scientists has been growing steadily; I would guess it is about 40 % now.»

The above «Climate of Doubt» program qualifies as such with its blatant insinuation about skeptics corrupted by illicit money, as does its prior 2008 program «Heat», in which only unidentified skeptic scientists were shown while the narrator said «Not only have big oil companies not invested much in renewables, but for years they were among the largest contributors to so - called climate change denier groups, groups like the Heartland Institute, the organizer of this 2008 convention.»

«Scientists are best qualified to deal with the scientific questions but we all have to deal with the financial consequences of any actions taken on bad science.»

I would agree with that, if each qualified scientist speaks for himself, but not if claims are made that 90 % of an unspecified group of scientists agree with AGW!

One scientist presents a position you like, so that trumps 97 other equally qualified scientists who disagree with him?

You said, «If scientists in other fields feel comfortable with the consensus view, why should I think I am qualified to dispute it?»

If scientists in other fields feel comfortable with the consensus view, why should I think I am qualified to dispute it?

They are hardly qualified to pass judgment on climate science, yet every list of scientists critical of global warming seems to be packed with them.

In particular, climates scientists often get very «creative» with statistical methods, and often create results which don't stand up to review by qualified statisticians outside the field.

This tends to show up with a lot of highly qualified scientists making questionable statements to the media to the effect of «we believe X is a result of AGW, but we need to perform further research to confirm this...».

Exactly the same as qualified scientists that forget basic training to follow personal beliefs that have nothing to do with the knowledge base gifted to them.

If, for example, your injuries are related to a defective product, it may be prudent to confer with industry experts, qualified engineers, scientists and designers about the product that caused your injuries.

Librarians, police officers, scientists, pilots and teachers are a diverse bunch, but they all have one thing in common: They qualify for car insurance discounts with some insurers.

Kolabtree is a PhD freelancing platform that connects businesses and labs with freelance PhD - qualified scientists all over the world.View Profile»

Summary of Qualifications Highly qualified licensed chemist with experience in Oral Solid Dosage, Parenterals Manufacturing in Quality Control Laboratory, Quality Assurance, Quality System, Quality Operations Technology Transfer and Process Scientist in Technical Services areas.