Sentences with phrase «qualified scientists working»
Not exact matches
An EPA spokeswoman has said Dourson, a professor at the University of Cincinnati, is a highly qualified scientist who previously worked for the EPA.
https://www.timesunion.com/
LinkedIn, her other tool of choice, includes users who wouldn't qualify as working scientists under ResearchGate's restrictions.
Five candidates per year are admitted to the program as apprentice scientists working in laboratories headed by qualified mentors.
Observing time on NRAO telescopes is available on a competitive basis to qualified scientists after evaluation of research proposals on the basis of scientific merit, the capability of the instruments to do the work, and the availability of the telescope during the requested time.
CLIP Grants provide funding for qualified scientists who are working to explore clinically relevant questions aimed at improving the effectiveness of cancer immunotherapies.
Despite what Joe Bast and Heartland comms director Jim Lakely claim, their false report is not peer - reviewed, a formal process conducted by editors at actual scientific journals have other qualified scientists rigorously review and critique submitted work if it is to be approved for publication.
«We now know that the work done at Climatic Research Unit barely qualified as science; they kept it secret to stop other scientists checking it; thus breaching one of the foundations of the scientific method.»
Our highly qualified team of genetic scientists, doctors, and board - certified genetic counselors are on - hand to work with you and your physician to provide the latest information and guidance to make better informed therapy decisions.
Thing is, automatic assignment is random, and the workers in the game each have individual skill sets, leading to automatic work assignments putting scientists into cantinas while under - qualified workers staff research facilities.
The Pet Industry Joint Advisory Council (PIJAC) is working with fishers and scientists to halt it in its tracks because the bill (a) risks jobs all across the islands, (b) is based upon activists» unscientific claims that ornamental fishing is environmentally unsound and (c) will leave divers without qualified partners — thus risking their lives.
Outside of this lone exception, the dispute has involved people who are not climate scientists whose flawed work slipped through a sloppy peer - review process (as discussed in False Claims by McIntyre and McKitrick) and elsewhere on this site, or highly qualified people like Michael Crichton.
Scientists have to qualify in the top percentile for intellect, AND they have to work hard for decades, and fight in the court of their peers (and fashions there can get in the way as well) for their ideas, but they are not known for patience with what appears to be stupidity.
The IPCC surely needs to explain how research assistants and those - working - on - their - masters qualify as the world's best experts and top scientists.
Our work on climate change is produced by a network of more than 200 highly qualified scientists, economists, and policy experts.
Medical doctors are quite entitled to comment on science in an area they have studied formally or informally...... anybody is, indeed hugely important work is done by non qualified scientists such as Steyn and Delingpole.
A huge problem is that many qualified scientists and others are skeptic of the Consensus Science, but they work for Alarmist Media or Government Agencies or Schools, that would get rid of them in a minute if they express their Skeptic Views.
«We now know that the work done at Climatic Research Unit barely qualified as science; they kept it secret to stop other scientists checking it; thus breaching one of the foundations of the scientific method.»
4) The working groups must include some qualified scientists who do not completely agree with the consensus view.
If the scientist is basing his work on a very small sample size or a survey or some other squishy method, he is ethically bound to qualify his assertions, but training to this effect is not adequate.
Despite what Joe Bast and Heartland comms director Jim Lakely claim, their false report is not peer - reviewed, a formal process conducted by editors at actual scientific journals have other qualified scientists rigorously review and critique submitted work if it is to be approved for publication.
you cant even name a Single scientist outside the blue team who is willing and qualified to work on attribution.
Because if I'm not qualified, then you should not be trusting the tools, methods and calculations used by climate scientists and others to do their work, nor the results of that work... because I had a role in developing and refining some of the very fundamental tools they (and you) use!
Perhaps Prof Emanuel will add his opinion here, but as a (much less eminent and well - qualified) working climate scientist, let me say this loud and clear:
said Coeur d'Alene environmental science teacher Jamie Esler, who served on a state committee of award - winning educators, parents, and scientists that developed the K12 science standards.The science standards developed by the highly qualified committee, over painstaking months of work, maintain «integrity around the science of climate,» and will enable Idaho science teachers to fully educate their students about human - caused climate...
The Danish scientific committe that looked at his publications seem to mean that, though his writings could be defined as «scientifically dishonest» in a strict and narrow sense; Lomborg himself isn't really «guilty» of this «crime» because his articles, books, aren't really science at all, and he isn't a real scientist qualified to work in this field.