Sentences with phrase «qualify as scientists»

That means there must be thousands, perhaps millions of people in this country who qualify as scientists in James Taylor's world.

So individuals such as Gavin Schmidt (who is a computer scientist by education) would also qualify as scientists in my analysis.

So, out of 27 speakers, we have between 10 and 11 speakers who qualify as scientists — the rest are lawyers, economists, etc..

If none of those qualify as scientists in your opinion, you could probably point me pretty quickly to statements from scientists who reacted in horror to the claim.

Actually, Bill Nye isn't too bad in that way, even though he is professionally not qualified as a scientist IMO.

While he is technically a neurologist and writer, he qualifies as a scientist in my mind.

So while Singer qualifies as a scientist, he is certainly not an ethical one, and there is a great deal of supporting data to prove it for anyone who cares to look.

Not exact matches

A study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences found that, when asked to rate junior scientists based on scholarly accomplishments and job interview performance, academics in the traditionally male - dominated STEM fields rated female candidates as being more hireable than their equally qualified male applicants.

They may not qualify as brain surgeons or rocket scientists but they know how to execute plans, get things done and beat Einstein to the punch.

But the truth is, the case for evolution would be strong even without fossil evidence, and scientists are lucky to have the number of fossils that can qualify as «intermediates» that they do.

CASE is a service that assists federal and state judges, administrative law judges in identifying highly qualified scientists, engineers, and healthcare professionals to serve as scientific and technical experts.

CASE is a service that assists federal, state judges, and administrative law judges in identifying highly qualified scientists, engineers, and healthcare professionals to serve as technical experts.

The visual systems of sea urchins, mantis shrimp and other creatures are broadening scientists» understanding of what qualifies as an eye, Susan Milius reported in «Strange visions» (SN: 5/28/16, p. 22).

The system we have now seems to be producing at least as many well - qualified scientists as the most obvious part of our S&T enterprise can absorb, and the energy, knowledge, and skill of those scientists is as high as it has ever been, or higher.

Scientists from countries such as Pakistan, India, or Saudi Arabia who are qualified for green cards are not encountering extraordinary problems.

LinkedIn, her other tool of choice, includes users who wouldn't qualify as working scientists under ResearchGate's restrictions.

The new virus, officially known as Mimivirus (because it mimics a bacterium), is a creature «so bizarre,» as The London Telegraph described it, «and unlike anything else seen by scientists... that... it could qualify for a new domain in the tree of life.»

Since 2008, as cutbacks left talented professionals unemployed, the company has been «very lucky to hire some exceptionally qualified scientists,» says Varney.

As a scientist, I'm uniquely qualified to discuss this.»

Five candidates per year are admitted to the program as apprentice scientists working in laboratories headed by qualified mentors.

Many doctorate - qualified scientists make the move away from research in academia, either through choice or as a consequence of permanent posts being scarce.

Just remember to indicate (by checking YES in item 1 of the form PHS - 398 Cover Page Supplement — the link is to a Microsoft Word document) that you qualify for consideration as an early - career scientist.

Local demand for these highly qualified scientists is expected to grow significantly in the coming years as the existing companies expand their operations and new companies arrive.

'' (Dr. Carl M. Cohen) qualifies as the de facto godfather of teaching EI (emotional intelligence) to scientists.»

Lindzen described the signatories as «eminent scientists and other qualified individuals» in his letter.

As for peer review, it means only that reasonably qualified scientists examined the manuscript and recommended changes to improve the paper, or recommended that the paper be rejected; the journal editor has to make a determination about the merits of the paper based largely, but not entirely on the reviewers» comments (the editor has some discretion in deciding to accept or reject — his / her reputation as an editor, and the reputation of the journal, depend on sound editorial judgmentsAs for peer review, it means only that reasonably qualified scientists examined the manuscript and recommended changes to improve the paper, or recommended that the paper be rejected; the journal editor has to make a determination about the merits of the paper based largely, but not entirely on the reviewers» comments (the editor has some discretion in deciding to accept or reject — his / her reputation as an editor, and the reputation of the journal, depend on sound editorial judgmentsas an editor, and the reputation of the journal, depend on sound editorial judgments).

«We now know that the work done at Climatic Research Unit barely qualified as science; they kept it secret to stop other scientists checking it; thus breaching one of the foundations of the scientific method.»

In criminal matters, scientific analyses and tests conducted by qualified forensic scientists can exonerate as well as convict an accused person.

In civil cases, such as a lawsuit for damages from a vehicle accident or from a medical problem, testing and analysis by a qualified forensic scientist may be used by either side to address the validity of the allegations in the suit.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out if something qualifies as a «whole food.»

Interesting Facts: It is the sweetest of the zero calorie natural sweeteners and qualifies as an intense sweetener, the term food scientists use to describe the new potent artificial sweeteners such as Neotame.

Maintaining our productivity as a nation depends importantly on developing a highly qualified cadre of scientists, engineers, entrepreneurs, and other professionals.

You appear to be better qualified as a politician or a marketer or a Pulp Fiction writer, and not as a scientist.

If we pick a nice round number like 2100, the most likely future as predicted by our most qualified scientists will be laid out for all to see - and, who knows, maybe even act upon.

When I Google that expression I get an awful lot of denialist sites come up; nobody on the first page of hits looks like a climate scientist — unless for example you're counting Viscount Monckton of Brenchley, whose scientific qualifications end at O - level (if he even got an O - level); or perhaps Joanne Nova, who has more scientific qualification, but isn't a climate scientist unless a bachelor's degree in microbiology qualifies her as such?

Outside of this lone exception, the dispute has involved people who are not climate scientists whose flawed work slipped through a sloppy peer - review process (as discussed in False Claims by McIntyre and McKitrick) and elsewhere on this site, or highly qualified people like Michael Crichton.

Scientists have to qualify in the top percentile for intellect, AND they have to work hard for decades, and fight in the court of their peers (and fashions there can get in the way as well) for their ideas, but they are not known for patience with what appears to be stupidity.

If another qualified scientist can respond who is not one of the above posters, I welcome his estimate as well.

As a little experiment I tried posting on RealClimate (on the Mountains and Molehills thread), pointing out that I was a highly experienced and well qualified scientist who was less than entirely convinced by the AGW orthodoxy.

The IPCC surely needs to explain how research assistants and those - working - on - their - masters qualify as the world's best experts and top scientists.

Joseph D'Aleo was one of fourteen Amici, described as «well - qualified climate scientists,» who claimed that the «EPA's endangerment finding is not «rational» and therefore arbitrary and capricious.»

As we discovered a year ago, for example, when Professor Andrew Dessler wrote on Grist that the IPCC consisted of thousands of climate scientists, all uniquely qualified to look after the sick planet, and that we ought to ignore social scientists and computer programmers.

[3] I explain in my presentations that as a scientist who is fully qualified to understand climate change, I seem dumber than the people who say they «know» the answers because I do not profess to know the future, especially of something so complicated as the global climate.

Each micro step will be heralded as a brilliant and sensational bit of scientific discovery, qualifying these scientist for prestige and additional grant money.

As to me needing to formally publish in a journal, I would prefer some qualified scientist, engineer, statistician, or economist (who is twenty or thirty years younger) to take what I have done, improve on it and get it published.

An expert on the history of science qualifies as an expert scientist.

Medical doctors are quite entitled to comment on science in an area they have studied formally or informally...... anybody is, indeed hugely important work is done by non qualified scientists such as Steyn and Delingpole.

As to being confused about the properties of the RE statistics, that would qualify you to be a climate scientist.

«We now know that the work done at Climatic Research Unit barely qualified as science; they kept it secret to stop other scientists checking it; thus breaching one of the foundations of the scientific method.»

Courts make a VERY clear distinction between free speech and deliberate libel; and equating a respected scientist (respected by his peers; he doesn't need the respect of the rubes) with a most reviled pervert and convicted criminal does qualify as deliberate slander.