Each micro step will be heralded as a brilliant and sensational bit of scientific discovery,
qualifying these scientist for prestige and additional grant money.
Not exact matches
The study was funded by EnCana, the drilling company whose wells the EPA had initially blamed
for the contamination.Though the role of fracking remains contested, the advising
scientists recommend that the EPA should
qualify its conclusions about the risks posed by acknowledging gaps in the existing data and concerning cases like Pavillion.
One of the things that may make Mr. Ham's arguments convincing
for some is his use of other
qualified scientists.
But the truth is, the case
for evolution would be strong even without fossil evidence, and
scientists are lucky to have the number of fossils that can
qualify as «intermediates» that they do.
An EPA spokeswoman has said Dourson, a professor at the University of Cincinnati, is a highly
qualified scientist who previously worked
for the EPA.
EFE This is a statement frm sm1 who is enlightened, pls d writen of d message ie Dr Biodun shld know dat they is a grp called medical Laboratory
Scientist & d duty of d CMD is
for d medically
qualified & all professionals in d health sector are with a high degree of experience & shld also note dat b4 HE Dr Biodun was born Medicine was a deploma progam so allow other who now run degrees to do freely
This view needs to change, and more positions need to be created
for the increasing number of
qualified scientists who are not interested in opening their own labs or who do not secure the few faculty positions available.
The draft proposal reinforces the need
for Argentina to set up «an immersive program enabling highly trained and
qualified scientists» to help agencies evaluate and put into action science - based policy options.
Scientists from countries such as Pakistan, India, or Saudi Arabia who are
qualified for green cards are not encountering extraordinary problems.
Two years ago Süd - Chemie opened new labs in Heufeld, Germany, that created 20 new jobs
for highly
qualified scientists.
OPR requires employer sponsorship, but it does allow the
scientist to
qualify for a green card without obtaining a Labor Certification from the U.S. Department of Labor.
When we analyze a client?s chances to
qualify for a green card, we first try the Alien of Extraordinary Ability and the National Interest Waiver categories, because these two categories permit the
scientist to petition the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) while avoiding both employer sponsorship and the cumbersome labor - certification process.
Letters of recommendation from
qualified scientists carry significant weight in evaluations
for hiring — but most especially promotion — because they provide an external measure that synthesizes all three of the key parameters we emphasize: productivity, recognition, and impact.
16:20 - Panel presentations Join us
for first hand perspectives from PhD
qualified and postdoctoral
scientists who have made a recent move into Industry.
«The overall lack of
qualified scientists has meant that companies need to cast their recruiting nets wider in order to find the right candidates,» says Anne Sabine, director, Australia,
for placement firm Kelly Scientific Resources.
Not that it's an ideal situation
for the universities either;
qualified scientists mid-way into research careers will be needed urgently within the next decade.
Among many highly
qualified applicants, they search
for the exceptional
scientists most likely to bring fresh, original ideas to the company.
The new virus, officially known as Mimivirus (because it mimics a bacterium), is a creature «so bizarre,» as The London Telegraph described it, «and unlike anything else seen by
scientists... that... it could
qualify for a new domain in the tree of life.»
At issue is the training required
for a natural
scientist to
qualify for a regulatory exemption.
In June, the Polish government announced a new grant
for young
scientists who earned high scores in an international funding competition; Dobrzyn is one of only 10
scientists who
qualify.
If you are a biomedical
scientist with a faculty position, you technically
qualify to apply
for an NIH research grant.
Thus, there is tremendous room
for creativity, growth, and development
for qualified and highly motivated young
scientists — optimally with a background in biology, medicine, or mathematics.
Just remember to indicate (by checking YES in item 1 of the form PHS - 398 Cover Page Supplement — the link is to a Microsoft Word document) that you
qualify for consideration as an early - career
scientist.
Beyond institutions, redirecting training efforts will require a concerted effort on the part of postdocs, faculty, disciplinary societies, and funding agencies to provide information on the variety of jobs that trained
scientists are
qualified for and professional development programs to help Ph.D. s gain entry into these fields.
Local demand
for these highly
qualified scientists is expected to grow significantly in the coming years as the existing companies expand their operations and new companies arrive.
Well -
qualified and savvy Ph.D.
scientists could very likely land substantially more lucrative offers on their own, but the program serves a useful purpose by aiming to ease the way to a first industrial position
for scientists unfamiliar with or intimidated by the nonacademic job market.
I am still waiting
for a
qualified climate
scientist to try to defend Trenberth's remarks.
CLIP Grants provide funding
for qualified scientists who are working to explore clinically relevant questions aimed at improving the effectiveness of cancer immunotherapies.
Despite what Joe Bast and Heartland comms director Jim Lakely claim, their false report is not peer - reviewed, a formal process conducted by editors at actual scientific journals have other
qualified scientists rigorously review and critique submitted work if it is to be approved
for publication.
As
for peer review, it means only that reasonably
qualified scientists examined the manuscript and recommended changes to improve the paper, or recommended that the paper be rejected; the journal editor has to make a determination about the merits of the paper based largely, but not entirely on the reviewers» comments (the editor has some discretion in deciding to accept or reject — his / her reputation as an editor, and the reputation of the journal, depend on sound editorial judgments).
In civil cases, such as a lawsuit
for damages from a vehicle accident or from a medical problem, testing and analysis by a
qualified forensic
scientist may be used by either side to address the validity of the allegations in the suit.
The program aims to fund pilot research so that
scientists can test their initial ideas and generate preliminary data in order to
qualify for larger grants from other organizations.
A spokesman
for the Department
for Education said: «This policy will free up academies to employ professionals - like
scientists, engineers, musicians, university professors, and experienced teachers and heads from overseas and the independent sector - who may be extremely well -
qualified and are excellent teachers, but do not have QTS status.»
The VAF provides funding
for grants in support of research, by
qualified animal health care professionals and
scientists, into the elimination of ocular diseases causing vision loss and suffering in animals
Whereas the question of who does the evacuation, who pays
for it, where and how should those people then be housed would go beyond the remit of the
scientists (and they wouldn't be any more
qualified than you or I to comment on this).
If we pick a nice round number like 2100, the most likely future as predicted by our most
qualified scientists will be laid out
for all to see - and, who knows, maybe even act upon.
When I Google that expression I get an awful lot of denialist sites come up; nobody on the first page of hits looks like a climate
scientist — unless
for example you're counting Viscount Monckton of Brenchley, whose scientific qualifications end at O - level (if he even got an O - level); or perhaps Joanne Nova, who has more scientific qualification, but isn't a climate
scientist unless a bachelor's degree in microbiology
qualifies her as such?
I asked a half dozen I.P.C.C.
scientists about this during a side session at the Copenhagen climate talks and, in particular, asked them to decipher
for me the meaning of the nested
qualifiers in that final statement.
While I agree with James that looking
for evidence of mendacity from Monckton is like shooting fish in a barrel with a stinger missile, unfortunately, James has decided not to name names
for his «swath of well
qualified and experienced
scientists».
Scientists have to
qualify in the top percentile
for intellect, AND they have to work hard
for decades, and fight in the court of their peers (and fashions there can get in the way as well)
for their ideas, but they are not known
for patience with what appears to be stupidity.
I am not a climate
scientist, so I will leave that question
for more
qualified researchers.
As we discovered a year ago,
for example, when Professor Andrew Dessler wrote on Grist that the IPCC consisted of thousands of climate
scientists, all uniquely
qualified to look after the sick planet, and that we ought to ignore social
scientists and computer programmers.
But you also said, «But let me try and make it even clearer: consensus by a vote of
qualified scientists is not a valid basis
for arriving at a logical, scientific conclusions about AGW — that's true» You have clearly contradicted yourself.
Ethical
scientist would make it clear that the normal standard
for scientific publication is «extremely likely», and that other
qualifiers are educated guesses that may assist policy maker, but fall short of traditional evidence needed to draw a scientific conclusion.
A huge problem is that many
qualified scientists and others are skeptic of the Consensus Science, but they work
for Alarmist Media or Government Agencies or Schools, that would get rid of them in a minute if they express their Skeptic Views.
So while Singer
qualifies as a
scientist, he is certainly not an ethical one, and there is a great deal of supporting data to prove it
for anyone who cares to look.
Sometimes I think all data should be taken away from
scientists and handed over to
qualified statisticians
for refinement prior to returning to the
scientists for analyses.
It strikes me as curious in the extreme that somebody — even someone with a climate
scientists disdain
for uncertainty — would not
qualify this comment in terms like «the earliest comment we've yet discovered».
If you can still convince yourself that your odd theory that heat somehow trapped by greenhouse gases is causing sea level rise or fall, and that you can somehow account
for things like totally unknown vertical displacements in sea beds in your measurement, you can probably
qualify as a climate
scientist.
* (
For a good reason, too — there are so inordinately few somewhat
qualified or learned and somewhat credentialed individuals on this subject who take the manufactured «anti Climate Change theory: view one that should be pursued by nearly every
scientist on the planet were it to have merit, as it is a far better end result if true, yet nevertheless is not, but persists in fact due to the enormous ideological, macroeconomically frightened (and myopically presumptive), and «good thing going» industry based pressures, behind it.)