The law grants priority to applicants that «plan to operate or manage high -
quality charter schools with racially and socioeconomically diverse student bodies.»
The Obama administration also championed high -
quality charter schools with its Race to the Top initiative, emphasizing support for charter schools as a major factor in whether states would receive part of the $ 4.35 billion fund.
Not exact matches
Taking Success's argument «to its logical conclusion,» Ms. Elia wrote, «would mean that D.O.E. would be required to provide
charter schools» prekindergarten programs
with public funding without any mechanism to ensure» that they were meeting
quality requirements, and that «public funds are being spent in accordance
with the requirements.»
The city said that the contract was necessary to ensure a consistent level of
quality and noted that the 13 other
charter school organizations
with prekindergarten had signed it.
The state Senate has taken a welcome step toward bolstering
quality education in New York
with a bill that would authorize creation of hundreds of new
charter schools across the state.
With this irresponsible action, the SUNY
Charter Schools Committee has eroded the
quality of teachers in New York State and negatively impacted student achievement.»
At a preemptive news conference
with education advocates, The Alliance for
Quality Education's Billy Easton says wealthy supporters of expanding
charter schools have spent nearly twice that amount, and have contributed large sums to the governor's campaign.
The council also asked the DOE, together
with SUNY, which approves
charter schools, to perform a full
quality review of Success Academy in Fort Greene, and if necessary, revoke its
charter to operate.
We met
with three hundred
charter leaders around the state to learn more about what could be done, and then built goals and objectives for the California
charter schools movement by first providing insurance, cash - flow financing, and other resources to
schools willing to focus on academic
quality (measured in many different ways).
But over time, what we thought of as
quality authorizing has morphed into a sort of technocratic risk management for the sector — a process whose own bias, one could argue, accelerated not the growth of
charter schools but the replication of one kind of
charter school with one specific sort of leader.
The United Neighborhood Organization (UNO), the community group that I lead in Chicago, and its network of
charter schools provide Hispanic immigrant families
with access to a high -
quality education, thereby challenging them to fulfill their great potential while promoting American values, ideals, and our collective successes.
Both the District of Columbia's and Denver's
charter schools have strong community support, which coupled
with demand for high -
quality charter schools, continues to spur growth.
The first step to gaining back and building support for
charter schools is to combine our first principle — holding them accountable for providing a
quality education —
with our second principle — ensuring that they are accessible to all families.
It is difficult to pin down the relative
quality of
charter and district
schools with confidence without studies that use admissions lotteries to compare the achievement of students who win
charter -
school admission to those who don't.
Charter parents also vary more in their satisfaction
with teacher
quality than do district -
school parents.
On most matters,
charters and district
schools are equally varied, but we do see greater variation within the
charter sector in parents» satisfaction
with school location and teacher
quality.
If we rely completely on
charter authorizers, we have a very long road ahead of us to replace all of our failing
schools with high -
quality ones and to provide real opportunity for all kids.
The NACSA report on state policies associated
with charter school accountability attempts to describe how laws, regulations, and authorizer practices interact to influence
charter quality.
Our main goal, in collaboration
with the district
schools, is to expand students» access to high -
quality schools, whether they're district
schools or public
charter schools.
In my view, the available choices should include private,
charter, and virtual
schools, and just about anything else
with the potential to deliver a
quality education to kids.
The statement includes a list of these developments: the US Supreme Court ruled scholarships constitutional; numerous studies showed these programs benefit needy kids; families empowered
with this choice express great satisfaction; urban districts continue to struggle despite great effort;
chartering hasn't created enough high -
quality seats; and smart accountability systems can ensure only high -
quality private
schools participate in these programs.
But I'm convinced that, at this point in time, the way to create lots more «high -
quality seats» for lots more kids is to make sure that
charter schools and private
school scholarships receive funding parity
with «the system.»
• Manage the actions of the dozen
charter authorizers, the Detroit Public
Schools, and the Educational Achievement Agency to make sure schools that don't meet a quality bar are closed and replaced with something
Schools, and the Educational Achievement Agency to make sure
schools that don't meet a quality bar are closed and replaced with something
schools that don't meet a
quality bar are closed and replaced
with something better.
Those high -
quality charter networks arguably have enough on their plates
with longer
school days, weeks and years, and they need to keep their miraculous scores up.
As
charter schools across the country struggle to keep up
with demand, a new federal tax incentive could hold the key to spurring billions of dollars in investment in low - income areas
with limited access to
quality public
charter school options.
Yet, there are still millions of children
with limited access to a high
quality public
charter school.
Go to «Technology Workshops for Teachers Make Computer Connections» and «A
Charter School Charts Success
with a
Quality - Control Initiative.»
If
charter schools were primarily established in response to dissatisfaction
with traditional public
schools, they would tend to be located in areas
with low -
quality traditional public
schools where students would tend to make below - average test - score gains.
Last time around, we argued that America's
charter marketplace has done a mediocre job of matching supply
with demand and ensuring solid
school quality.
(See the Edutopia.org article «A
Charter School Charts Success
with a
Quality - Control Initiative.»)
Develop a strong core of high -
quality schools in the
charter sector by working
with the best
charter authorizers to develop
quality benchmarks and close low - performing
charters in a targeted set of neighborhoods.
«Why would the NAACP agree to sue the very
charter schools that were providing so many black kids
with a high
quality education?»
Families Empowered will readily match children
with high -
quality district,
charter, and private
schools.
The Broad plan, recast as Great Public
Schools Now, «re-launched» in June
with a changed emphasis on adding high -
quality school seats wherever they are found,
charter or district, a clear shift that resulted from the aggressive pushback against the original plan.
But what happens if we marry high - performing
charter schools with high -
quality pre-k?
And AppleTree Early Learning, a pre-k-only
charter school, works
with preschool providers in the area to implement its evidence - based instructional model, increasing the supply of high -
quality seats in the District.
I agree
with Bradford that single - site
schools and small, locally grown and community - based networks are crucial assets for the
charter movement and important contributors to expanding access to
quality schools in communities that demand them.
Camino Nuevo, a
charter school in Los Angeles, previously supplemented state funds
with local dollars through the Los Angeles Universal Preschool (LAUP) program, but LAUP recently stopped funding preschool slots — so this year Camino Nuevo will have to raise an additional $ 150,000 from private sources to maintain its current pre-k enrollment and
quality.
And by pairing these
schools with high -
quality charter operators, they inject the capacity — better staff, better curriculum, new resources — that had been missing.
If we in the
charter community respond
with robust growth of high -
quality schools, we will surely see greater public understanding from all quarters.
More specifically, I concur that some
charter applications seem to equate length
with rigor, ask for information
with limited bearing on
school quality, and pose major obstacles to first - time operators.
I am not suggesting that the Arnold Foundation (or the
charter movement in general) abandon all
quality control efforts, but I think
quality is best promoted by relying heavily on parent judgement and otherwise relying on a decentralized system of authorizers
with the most contextual information to make decisions about opening and closing
schools if parents seem to have difficulty assessing
quality on their own.
These efforts aim to produce more consistent
quality among both
charter and private
schools and to equip parents
with information to make sound decisions regarding their child's
schooling.
This point raises an intriguing question: What happens if we combine high - performing
charter schools with high -
quality pre-K education?
they point out that in some states, authorizers operate virtually unchecked,
with dire consequences for students, and that the National Alliance for Public
Charter Schools approves the
quality controls of only two states (Hawaii and Louisiana) and the District of Columbia.
Finally, the authors provide some intriguing suggestive evidence that the improvement in
charter school quality is associated
with the growing prevalence of
charter schools that adhere to a «No Excuses» approach that focuses on strict discipline, high expectations, and increased learning time.
Based at the Harvard Graduate
School of Education, SDP partners with school districts, charter networks, state agencies, and nonprofits to bring high - quality research methods and data analysis to bear on strategic management and policy deci
School of Education, SDP partners
with school districts, charter networks, state agencies, and nonprofits to bring high - quality research methods and data analysis to bear on strategic management and policy deci
school districts,
charter networks, state agencies, and nonprofits to bring high -
quality research methods and data analysis to bear on strategic management and policy decisions.
The Strategic Data Project partners
with school districts,
charter school networks, and state education agencies to bring high
quality research methods and data analysis to bear on strategic management and policy decisions.
Part of the Center for Education Policy Research (CEPR) at Harvard University, SDP partners
with school districts,
charter school networks, state education agencies, and nonprofit organizations to bring high -
quality research methods and data analysis to bear on strategic management and policy decisions.
A new federal tax incentive could hold the key to spurring billions of dollars in investment in low - income areas
with limited access to
quality public
charter school options.