Without help, many families can face the untenable choice of not working or leaving their children in unsafe, unstable, or poor
quality child care arrangements.
Not exact matches
So here we are in 2006, with parents piecing together a patchwork of
arrangements to
care for the kids while they're at work, and with only the richest having access to high -
quality child care.
On the other hand, when combined with social and economic stressors at home, inadequate ECEC
arrangements (poor
quality child care, long hours, and instability) represent a double - threat to
children's attachment security.
Goals of PSSF are to prevent the unnecessary separation of
children from their families, improve the
quality of
care and services to
children and their families, and ensure permanency for
children by reuniting them with their parents, by adoption or by another permanent living
arrangement.
Contrary to meta - analytic findings of the earlier literature that focused only on the effects of the amount of
care provided without adequately controlling for selection effects, the NICHD Study found that a number of features of
child care (the amount of
child care, age of entry into
care, and the
quality and stability of
child care) were unrelated to the security of infant — mother attachments or to an increased likelihood of avoidant attachments, except when mothers provided less sensitive parenting of their infant.11 For the
children who received less sensitive maternal
care, extended experience with
child care, lower -
quality child care, and more changes in
child care arrangements were each associated with an increased likelihood of developing an insecure attachment with their mothers.
Unless
child care quality is very poor, or the mother is insensitive to a
child's needs, non-parental
child care does not appear to undermine the security of the infant — mother attachment per se, but there are indications that this relationship may be more vulnerable when the mother herself provides less sensitive
care and her
child experiences poorer
quality care, more changes in
arrangements or many hours of
care.
In addition to improving access to high -
quality programs for
children, the proposal would save families thousands of dollars per year and facilitate
child care arrangements that support financial security for working families.
A patchwork of informal
care arrangements can deprive
children of the educational and developmental benefits associated with high -
quality child care.
Yet what the findings actually revealed was a «dual - risk» phenomenon.17 Although the strongest predictor of insecurity at 15 months of age was, as expected, insensitive mothering (observed at ages 6 and 15 months), this effect was amplified if any one of three distinct
child -
care conditions characterized the
child's experience across the first 15 months of life: (a) averaging more than 10 hours per week in any type of
care, irrespective of
quality; (b) enrolment in more than a single
child -
care arrangement; and (c) exposure to low
quality care.
When the mother - infant relationship is compromised,
children are more likely to become insecure if
child care arrangements are poor
quality, of long duration, or involve multiple transitions between settings.
Regardless of whether infants and young
children are in
care of high or low
quality, or have begun
care from an early age, have experienced many or few transitions in
care arrangements, or are out of the home for extended hours, the security of infant - mother attachment is primarily guided by the sensitivity of maternal
care.
In addition, it is imperative that policies address the need to expand the availability and affordability of high -
quality, affordable
child care services (both centre - and home - based) so that parents have peace of mind when they return to work and
children benefit from stimulating and sensitive non-parental caregiving
arrangements.
A profile approach to
child care quality, quantity, and type of setting: Parent selection of infant
child care arrangements