Sentences with phrase «quality games did»

Even the high - quality games did not have much innovation.

Not exact matches

Twenty years ago, id Software was the brand — it didn't matter what the titles or settings of its games were, gamers knew that having the developer's name on the box was a sign of quality.

If baseball does indeed possess metaphysical qualities, one wonders whether the perfect game stolen yesterday from Detroit pitcher Armando....

Providing restaurants with the same high - quality products from companies such as Broadleaf Game, Creekstone Farms and Cargill Beef Packing gives chefs comfort that the dishes they are producing will taste the same a month from now as they do today.

«Then we need to transform the quality of the preparation into points and that is of course a pragmatic view, but what matters is we win the next game and start in a strong way, which we didn't do last year.

Ospina is doing well but he needs a help from someone with the same quality or even better than him, Seczny is very poor psychologically especially when the game is under pressure, he lacks ideas even his ball distribution is very poor, i think he should go.

Consistency is ultimately the key word for Arsenal moving forward, as if they could get at teams like they did with Spurs on a regular basis and really put the pressure on them while going out to win games and showing their quality, they can beat any team on their day.

I didn't rate his overall defensive quality in that game and to also know his age.

«It was done in a stylish way, and a technically high - quality game from our side,» Wenger said.

Sanchez number ten position he dictate the game with quality wingers a good center forward we don't need ozil elneny an ahaka with William carvalho new left back five new players on we are good

What's this i see here.This site is also in a crisis and that is understating the qualities of our players.I for one will take Walcott over Pedro and i am just responding to a question.I just do nt get it.To me Walcott really is that good and we need him inform.Injuries have hampered his progress a lot as a player but at least i am happy with him.I do not even get why peeps criticize him so badly.To me he should be our starting right winger.We need him because he is a game changer.I just do nt get how he is on the bench.Peeps are so ignorant and will gather whatever facts they can to make him seem average.Talk about the certain 3 musketeers in arsenal lineup but not him.He is a very dangerous player

Ozil adds a quality to the team that nobody else can — even Cazorla can not do what Ozil has the potential to do in a game.

I have said before yesterdays game that we need a top class forward and dm to challenge having watched yesterdays diabolical performance i feel we need to ad a out and out winger to the team playing ozil or carzola out left is not working pedro would have been a fantastic signing but looks like he is going to man u. I thought coq passing yesterday was terrible we need someone who can do both jobs sit in front of back 4 but when in possession have the quality to make things happen coq lacks the 2nd part by a long way.

no not at All and even though elneny isn't mahrez quality yet elneny scored against barca where mahrez didn't score against PSG for mahrez to be of special quality eg suarez messi henry batastuta would have scored putting his mark on the Game

Wud put arteta in Xl with le coq, Ramsey, Sanchez and santi, with ozil coming on as sub or roaring with any of the others, put swap arteta with theo once his back to full match fitness (been a little off every time his played) I always feel better wen Ramsey plays, offers something different and aterta us just arsenal quality, versitile and can pass the ball don't need to argue for Sanchez le coq or santi and I think ozil will get plenty of games anyway

Even during the times of Denis B, Thiery H and Viera those referees were always against us otherwise how would one explain us with all that quality loosing to manure certain games??? The fa is part of that plan... the referees they keep giving those big games... why did we have to play manure on our 50th unbeaten game (not to mention the controvercial penalty awarded), why did we have to play wenger's 1000th game against a moreens chelsea we've never beaten?

It was actually a gift to a player of Alexis quality in that kind of position and the forward did not waste time to beat the goalkeeper and convert into the empty net to set the tone for Arsenal in the game.

«I do really like him as a player but sometimes in the game he does look quite slow, although he has that quality to change the game.

Rosicky and Poddolski had bad games but, overall, I don't think the quality play was bad.

I just don't think this was a game Wenger could have done a whole lot about and I think that it's still hard for us to buy really top quality players to shove on the bench.

Watching the Arsenal v Everton game in the Singapore Cup and the commentator said how easy it was to overlook Ozil's quality because of how effortless he made it look — suggested if it was Ramsey or Wilshere pinging the ball around like he was doing then it would attract a lot more attention.

Its because our tactics do not change we play the same way regardless of the opposition and that works well when you have the quality of say the Invincibles, we play our game against the very best and think we will come out on top.

I don't see that quality in ozil.He is getting more on the ball these few games but he isn't doing anything exceptional just normal passing, yesterday we were much better at penetrating their defence we just lacked a proper finish.

Adding fresh quality players to a team does not only bring their qualities but make existing players in the team raise their game.

Arsenal always do best when our fans expect them to lose, and as Arsene Wenger says, the game at the Etihad is «a good opportunity for us to show we have quality»

The Red Devils were two goals down and didn't even look a threat of taking something from the game as the looked devoid of any real quality in the opening 45 minutes.

Wenger would need to set up as he did at chelsea to make it a game but he wont have the balls to leave out ozil and sanchez and put in 2 players that do nt have there quality but will put a shift in for the team!!

A treble in his first season at Barcelona and another Champions League in just his first three seasons in management was a remarkable achievement, no question, and if anything his struggles at Bayern show that one can not simply inherit a good set of players and let them do the rest, but while he revolutionised the game in 2009, he is now being found out and it is something of a surprise that he has no other European Cup to his name since 2011 given the quality of teams he's had at his disposal since then.

I even thought top clubs were in for him.Some three or 2 seasons back many here were debating why he should be our main striker.As soon as you mention any other strikers name people would come out with stats and many things defending him.Even Wenger has defended him blindly in the past.People say Wenger's stubborn yeah.But don't we know that there's a reason why everything happens?Honestly speaking he's the reason why Arsene Wenger has failed to sign a top notch striker because he still believes in him.The funny thing is we signed Welbeck at that time who to me did nothing before to be the main man here.People keep saying Welbeck is hardworking and that he works his socks off.But the question is was that our reason for signing him.Welbeck being signed to challenge Giroud tells me a lot about Giroud's quality.Even Walcott (no offence to him) who has zero CF qualities was even chosen over him for a string of games and all in all I think he did well but has too many defeciencies for that role.We've compromised as a club and it'll come back to bite us.

Thirty one catches in four games is pretty damn good in its own right, but the quality of some of those catches, especially what he did after the ball was in his hands, were just ridiculous.

And I don't think its the quality of current arsenal players which matter, but their game style....

If you want to play open game like we do, you got to have those two positions covered sufficiently with quality.

The quality of the game doesn't even matter, because the setting is just so bizarre.

Watching game yesterday should confirm need for another strike option... Walcott wellbeck sanogo podolski etc will not do the job... and if Alexis proves anything it's that shelving out on quality reaps dividends... 20 goal a season man would be the best but someone with a dozen or more in them is critical

Lets be honest arteta isnt a DM and in the big games he hasnt do nt amazing, personally I think we should of let him go, he isn't arsenal quality

Unfortunately, we didn't score, and we lost the game... and that shows the quality that Barcelona has over us.

what is going on with our youth teams they do nt seem to be winning many games these days, we are a club that try to pride itself on our youth set up producing quality but we do nt seem to be moving forward and winning things at youth level.

OT: With all respect to Silva, Sterling and De Bruyne, I can see Toure is the real driver of City in big games... That's been said we have to give them less spaces and time to move the ball, they do have real qualities...

All we can do is try to add any super quality players we can (RB + RW being the 2 positions to avoid signings) and hopefully keep playing to our best in the big games.

While Giroud has largely been a backup for much of the last year, he continues to show his quality when he does get on the pitch, scoring five goals this season despite barely starting any games.

The headline is misleading, Arsene mentioned that the attitude of the crowd is based on the quality of the game, also with or without crowd they have to play the game and play to win.He provided an honest answer to the question.Last week was a holiday weekend and before that was poor weathet.never the less he did humbly acknowledge that absenteeism is a concern for him but as a pro he has to win the game and win back those few wayward fans.

He doesn't defend, doesn't turn up in the big games therefore isn't Arsenal quality.

I don't think it was a dig at giroud just ozil is praising welbecks qualities which make the game easier FOR ozil.

Yes he does offer commitment and passion on the pitch when he is played.But he also has poor qualities that stand out in the games.

They definitely have a great understanding and possess different qualities to complement each other's game but is that enough or do Arsenal need a big defender transfer to avoid another season without the title?

they do nt concede lots of goals because they have 70 per cent posession most games... as quality teams worked this out and focused on defending deep and counterattacking, their weak points were quickly recognised and that was pique....

I would guess that Xhaka will be a DM / Deep lying playmaker, to be fair I am only worried about our CM when Ramsey is in it Would be nice to have quality in cover for our CM, they can dictate the game and we do tend to suffer from injuries DM = Coquelin / Elneny / Xhaka?

Football is a game where one team tries to outwit the other and being too obvious is not always the smartest thing to do but some of us fans, we'd spend 90 million on a Pogba, I actually do nt see the problem with spending that much on Pogba if you can actually afford it, so I won't even hate lol, but of that amount, how much is hype and how much is actual quality?

We still struggle, look shaky and uncomfortable when we come up against any team that plays a high intensity game, teams that don't give us time on the ball, in your face etc all give us a hard time, Watford did that in the first half but poor final 3rd quality saved us, in the second half they were tired and knackered so we took advantage.

Per has bags of experience and defensive quality and we need him to show it all at the weekend, but that is exactly what he did in his last big game against EPL rivals, when he helped us to beat Chelsea at Wembley to lift the FA cup.