Sentences with phrase «quality look bad»

Not exact matches

Worse still, people are oftentimes not looking for perfection (Clotaire Rapaille says that the American culture code for quality is «it works»).

As for these market pull back or sales I like to think of them as, I was looking at Canadian Banks, but also some of the big named REITs I like are offering some good prices as well, either way BMO is never a bad share to buy, quality over quantity right?

I'm am happy we are looking at a replacement CDM in the market and that Mohamed Elneny does not look to bad got some great qualities (at least from what I have read and seen).

Yeah absolutely right.We must play with a 442 but need a Top Quality DFM.Zhaka can not retain his place in the side any longer.How bad must he continue to play before he is dropped?Play AMN.The boy looks a very good prospect and deserves a chance.Ramsey continues to prove he is not anywhere near Jacks class and offers us nothing against a defence that sits and invites us on.

I looked at 10 years» worth of Selection Committee criteria (RPI, road / neutral wins, good wins, bad losses, etc.), along with a general quality rating (the Ken Pomeroy rankings) to see what seemed to make the most difference to the Selection Committee.

So I am not looking for Arsenal to make wholesale changes in the summer, but I do expect the boss to make a few big transfers to add the right quality and cover to stop the problems that hurt us so badly in the middle section of this season.

It was usually either Liverpool, Chelsea or Man U having a real bad season but now all teams look at a similar pace and it will come down to quality, which is where Arsene is behind these days.

Here is the scenario you all know: — By Jan our injury list will look shorter and shorter — By Jan Arsenal starts to perform better — «We believe we have the quality and we are already strong enough and we don't need to sign new players» Wenger — Next press conference «We are working 24 hrs a day to find quality players and if we find one we will do it» Wenger, and he will never find any — kim kallstrom type at best — Ooooops, bad luck, bad luck, injuries hit again... — Don't worry AKB we will finish no lower than 4th...

I am pissed today hearing about Olivier Giroud three year contract and salary he is earning.That is unfair because Giroud does not deserve it.He has not worked to show that he deserves it.We should look at the quality snd output of our players before paying them.Well its too late now so we should look forward.We do nt need stats to even tell us that Girouf is usually average for arsenal than good at most times.I would have sold him if i was Wenger because he does not deserve to be leading the line still after 3 years and i doubt he will like to warm the bench.He is very lucky to have Wenger as a coach of arsenal london fc.Arsenal has not moved forward because we think getting rid of players is a bad thing.We always hesitate when it comes to selling players we do nt need.Arsenal need a world class cf not a world class cf.Its is time to move forward by addressing our mistakes.Since Van persie left we have needed a cf and ifBenzema is available we need to get rid of who we do nt need so that we move forward.Arsenal do not need Giroud though many may be against my speech.Once the premier league starts and Giroud is our main cf it shows that Wenger has not learnt from his mistakes.Just as we got Cech who to me was a need he needs to just find as a reliable and clinical cf.

Are you really naive enough to believe that Wenger would bring anyone into this current locker room that is going to be given a strong voice... have you not been watching, listening or reading about our club for years... Lehman is a blind Wenger follower, which is the only reason he was even considered... just for a second think of all the strong personalities that have played for this club that have never been seriously considered even though they have expressed legitimate interest in participating in the coaching process... even worse, think of all the former greats who aren't even allowed on the same pitch as Wenger because they have offered their advice and / or criticism to the infallible one... I dare you to find a manager that has distanced himself from his former players as much as this man... it's the very reason why only one player I can think of has ever returned to play for Wenger and that was Flamini, which was hilarious considering we were desperately looking for a top quality defensive midfielder but Wenger could somehow find no one better than Flamini in the whole wide world... let's face it this club was simply trying to appease it's disgruntled fans by declaring that Wenger would no longer be given Ca rte Blanche when it came to the backroom staff so they probably asked him to give them a list of those who he would allow in the locker room... on that list he wrote Lehman, Pires and Bergkamp, likely because the first two are the only former players who haven't publicly questioned his horrible decision - making and the last one because he won't get in an airplane

OT: Looking at City 1st goal, badly we missed a quality DM.....

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

I do not want to see Wenger stay around and make our quality players look worse and eventually consistently playing at a lower level of form means they become thought of as lesser players, actions speaking.

In turn, one of the worst defences in the top flight is about to be left short of some of their first choice defenders against a Liverpool side with plenty of attacking quality, and so it does look concerning from a West Ham perspective.

Thank God there's someone that is not so quick to blame it on Wenger... at one point the players have to look at themselves sometimes... we dominate but not score enough when we have to finish it off either we make a terrible mistake (this time it was Ospina & our bad defending) OR we fail to score when we should... The selection was spot on and we should've done better... I believe we tend to underestimate some teams in UCL thinking with the quality we have no problem: BUT IT IS.

I just hope people stop this «he's lazy so don't sign him» thing.Riyad Mahrez is a quality player and in my eyes one of the best PL dribblers.Sanchez may be the better player but Riyad is still the better dibbler.He makes dribbling look so easy.He's even destroyed Arsenal before and was one of the few players who made Coquelin who was so defensively solid look bad in 14/15.

Sead look like a quality signing, and I feel the lack of support affected the team badly this past season... lets support the team under any circumstances this season #COYG

That doesn't mean Wenger should stop looking for a top quality striker though, as it's an issue that badly needs addressing.

that is the big question.How long do you want to keep on living with problems in the team without attempting to solve them.Without a doubt you and I know this and we know what we must do.You must ensure that you have the right players before talking about cohesion and injuries.As at now I look at the arsenal team and say if arsenal do nt solve their problems it will be worse and continue to haunt them.We need quality in the team as much as cohesion and staying injury free is important.Quality is however the most important.That differentiates a bigger club from a lesser club yes «quality».

On one hand, we'd be landing top class quality if we sign him and his ban give him time to settle but on the other, we are looking at a bad character, a possible Real Madrid target and importantly paying something close to 50m for him.

(And apparently, parents are generally quite bad at recognising what «quality» early childhood education looks like.)

However, when looked at as a high - quality heirloom that should easily comfort multiple generations, the price suddenly doesn't look so bad.

While it looks good on paper, we haven't truly made the advancements we think and quality of life for minorities and the poor are just as bad.

Improving everyone's quality of life includes looking at how people treat each other, he argued, including tackling bad behaviour.

With so many different brands on the market looking to target all individual needs and tastes, this can be a rather complicated tasks — especially because there are some manufacturers who tend to use low - quality ingredients and load their products with fructose, artificial sweeteners and artificial flavors, which is really bad news for anyone committed to a healthy lifestyle.

If you have bad breath, it's worth looking at your sleep patterns and trying to ensure you get enough good quality sleep.

If your search for a high - quality plant protein brings back bad memories of the last time you were looking to buy a new car, we feel you!

Conversely, bad quality lace can look tacky very quickly!

Since the weather in Berlin was quite nasty lately, I had to shoot my look indoors (sorry for the bad picture quality!).

The thing is, a poor - quality fur coat always looks bad.

That has never occurred to me, but it would help hugely with thin fabrics and cheaper brands like HnM (I like their stuff but often find it looks bad quality on me, but I've never tried a slip!)

Everyone has good and bad qualities, you might know instantly that the date is not for you in a romantic sense or you might find that although they don't meet your usual criteria in the looks department, that as regards personality, they are intriguing and yes, attractive.

Using a photo with bad lighting or a low quality photo is not ideal, as people will not be able to see what you look like properly.

10 Years Offering Popular Quality Products On It's not your imagination — bad boys really are better looking.

VERY BAD THINGS looks like an Ensemble movie with very few redeeming qualities, other than Beautiful Cameron, Nicholson-esque Slater, and always amusing Piven.

This movie is an obvious lame attempt to make FIFA look presentable in the eyes of many and the bad quality of the movie shows.

I know that may be stating the obvious with a Blu - ray release, but keep in mind that commonly some blu - ray releases can look worse than their dvd counterpart due to over saturation or abuse of DNR or just lack of a quality transfer or original quality film to work with.

It's not just bad art, it's unscrupulous, cutthroat capitalism; and just as we reject cheap knock - offs of quality product, we should probably look the other way when presented with something called Hellraiser: Hellworld.

What we gather from this is how bad the film could look without proper remastering, as the cropped - for - fullscreen preview shows the film in subpar quality.

Unfortunately, this is one of the worst looking films of the set, most notably during the beginning of the film which is almost unwatchable due to the poor quality of the source print.

The special effects range from bad video game quality — the car chase through Venice is awful and almost comical, it must have looked hilarious on a big screen — to tolerable.

I'm just so happy I still have Bioshock on my 6 plus I was hoping they would had Minerva's den and better quality but at least on the 6s it's not to bad compared to my other phones it was looking like 50 % VHS lol whatever graphics that is.?

Then suppose that they do not value teachers of high quality, perhaps because they make other teachers look bad in comparison.

That's a shame, since the same basic dysfunctions that ail general education afflict special education too: middling (or worse) teacher quality; an inclination to throw «more people» at any problem; a reluctance to look at cost - effectiveness; a crazy quilt of governance and decision - making authorities; a tendency to add rather than replace or redirect; and a full - on fear of results - based accountability.

State testing makes choice schools look worse than they really are, and there's no evidence that state testing requirements improve outcomes or ensure quality.

Indeed, a close look at MCAS results shows there is surprisingly little difference between the quality of teaching in so - called «good» schools (wealthy, suburban schools with high MCAS scores) and «bad» schools (inner - city schools with low scores) when the results are averaged across all teachers in the district and disaggregated by student demographics, specifically race and poverty.

The state received a C - in Education Week's 2017 report card on school quality, and it got one of the worst grades in the nation in the analysis's «chance for success» category, which uses various metrics to «look at the role of education in promoting an individual's chance for success over the course of a lifetime.»

Alternatively, teacher quality may be inequitably distributed across schools, meaning that below - average teachers with a lot of below - average peers look a lot better when comparisons are made within schools, while above - average teachers with a lot of above - average peers look worse.

The ride quality is good but the looks are very bad.

In one special service which specialization was just transmissions - two guys took a look at it and said that it's not transmission related and sent us to other service where the guy checked it and said that it could be by bad GAS quality in Wyoming / Montana (plus they are adding ethanol - at least in Montana) and by old engine oil (plus different grade 10W - 30 instead 5W - 30).