Sentences with phrase «quality multiple assessments»

Not exact matches

The Student Editions include: • Links to instructional videos, audio, or texts • Links to practice quizzes or activities • 12 assessments that include a total of 39 multiple choice, 2 true / false, and 2 sorting questions • Definitions of key terms related to each of the standards • Examples of how students can apply the standards to their reading and deepen their understanding of what they are reading • Excerpts from several high - quality texts, including: - «Harriet: The Moses of Her People» by Sarah H. Bradford - «The Narrative of Sojourner Truth» by Olive Gilbert and Sojourner Truth - «On Women's Right to Vote» by Susan B. Anthony - «Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death» by Patrick Henry • Accompanying Teaching Notes files The Teaching Notes files include: • Additional activities and writing prompts to help your students explore the standard • Links to additional resources • Ideas to differentiate the activities for students who need extra support or to be challenged further • Answer guides with correct answers, answer choice rationales, word counts, and DOK (Depth of Knowledge) levels

Provide ELLs with quality instructional practices and resources, including fair assessments, free use of dictionaries and thesauruses, extra time, and the option of multiple media.

Invest in high - quality assessments that contain fewer multiple choice items and more constructed responses that require students to not only know, but be able to apply, key concepts to unique situations.

During the past two decades, he has been involved in the design of performance - based assessments; education for understanding; the use of multiple intelligences to achieve more personalized curriculum, instruction, and pedagogy; and the quality of interdisciplinary efforts in education.

Tomlison explains how DI is rooted in assessment, is essentially about quality of lesson planning, and shows the reader how to create multiple approaches to learning in the classroom.

We need to leave behind standardized testing as the sole measure to determine whether students and schools are succeeding or failing, and adopt new models that include rich, curriculum - embedded performance assessments and multiple measures of assessing school quality.

Information, resources and tools that highlight the power of performance assessments as robust tools to measure student growth in multiple ways with technical quality (reliable, valid and fair).

While multiple meta - analyses and large - scale research studies have found that models following the bilingual approach can produce better outcomes than ESL models, as measured by general academic content assessments or measures of reading comprehension or skills, other studies indicate that the quality of instructional practices matter as well as the language of instruction.

In reality, it will not be possible for most states to both intensify narrow testing such as that proposed by Bush and to improve the quality of assessments while adopting multiple measures.

Although the Teacher Education Accreditation Council (TEAC, 2009) quality principles do not make specific reference to a technology - based assessment system, programs are required to use multiple measures and assessment methods to demonstrate preservice teacher learning.

In terms of deciding the criteria for whether a school has or could become high - quality, the group said it would base decisions on «multiple measures such as state assessments, graduation rates, and other metrics.»

Although it may seem as though having more assessments will mean we are more accurately estimating student achievement, the use of multiple measures does not, by itself, translate into high - quality evidence.

Given the rise in testing, especially in light of a heightened focus on using multiple measures, it's increasingly important to address two essential components of reliable assessments: quality and balance.

Five keys to assessment quality provide the larger picture into which our multiple measures must fit (Stiggins, Arter, Chappuis, & Chappuis, 2006).

The panelists — including Arkansas's Fort Smith Public Schools Superintendent Benny Goodman and the National Center for Learning Disabilities's Laura Kaloi — also advocated for using multiple assessment measures to judge school quality, adding more flexibility for improving low - performing schools, maintaining a focus on holding schools accountable for the performance of student subgroups, tracking student growth, and ensuring states set high standards.

One example is the criteria for determining whether a public school is high - quality, or has the potential to be high - quality, which will be based on multiple measures such as state assessments, graduation rates, and other metrics.

Implementing multiple - source assessment practices that drive curricula and instructional alignment and teacher quality.

Condition 5 — A quality system of assessment incorporates multiple forms of assessments, and is used for multiple purposes.

High - quality accountability measures and reliable assessments including true multiple measures

High - quality early care and education programs result from an intentional alignment and coordination of multiple systems / components: early learning standards, program standards, comprehensive assessment systems, data systems, family and community partnerships, health promotion, and workforce development.

Research and best practice models suggest that high - quality assessments: (1) measure what they are designed to measure; (2) are consistently applied and tested for fairness; (3) regard assessment as an ongoing process for professional growth, not just a «tool» or an isolated event; (4) use the best available evidence, often from multiple sources; (5) reinforce the organization's core goals; (6) provide actionable feedback on what matters most; and (7) help build a culture of continuous improvement.

Multiple responses from different participants in a single case are welcome as they will facilitate increased quality control and more nuanced data assessment.

The NSHAP is a rich source of data on the lives of older adults that includes assessments of several aspects of marital and similar partnered relationships, subjective and objective dimensions of visual function, and multiple dimensions of quality of life.

The quality of each study was evaluated independently by MS and SJM according to the following eight validity criteria, which were adapted from the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines [14,15] and Delphi criteria list [16]: randomization; allocation concealment; blinding of outcome assessments; comparability of groups at baseline; withdrawals; handling of dropouts in analyses; use of intention - to - treat analysis; and multiple follow - up assessments.