Sentences with phrase «quality of the game how»

Not exact matches

What's this i see here.This site is also in a crisis and that is understating the qualities of our players.I for one will take Walcott over Pedro and i am just responding to a question.I just do nt get it.To me Walcott really is that good and we need him inform.Injuries have hampered his progress a lot as a player but at least i am happy with him.I do not even get why peeps criticize him so badly.To me he should be our starting right winger.We need him because he is a game changer.I just do nt get how he is on the bench.Peeps are so ignorant and will gather whatever facts they can to make him seem average.Talk about the certain 3 musketeers in arsenal lineup but not him.He is a very dangerous player

Even during the times of Denis B, Thiery H and Viera those referees were always against us otherwise how would one explain us with all that quality loosing to manure certain games??? The fa is part of that plan... the referees they keep giving those big games... why did we have to play manure on our 50th unbeaten game (not to mention the controvercial penalty awarded), why did we have to play wenger's 1000th game against a moreens chelsea we've never beaten?

Watching the Arsenal v Everton game in the Singapore Cup and the commentator said how easy it was to overlook Ozil's quality because of how effortless he made it look — suggested if it was Ramsey or Wilshere pinging the ball around like he was doing then it would attract a lot more attention.

The Pac 12 is an exercise in motion about how conference management can affect the quality of the games, as well as the outcomes and prosperity of its participants.

Maybe that is why Arsene Wenger has made a point of praising the giant defender ahead of the Chelsea game, as reported by the Arsenal website, talking about his leadership qualities and how important he is to the squad even if he is not playing.

Football is a game where one team tries to outwit the other and being too obvious is not always the smartest thing to do but some of us fans, we'd spend 90 million on a Pogba, I actually do nt see the problem with spending that much on Pogba if you can actually afford it, so I won't even hate lol, but of that amount, how much is hype and how much is actual quality?

Also you said barring Chambers they've all failed for you.Ok now that's your opinion.I for one think Gibbs, Wilshere and Ox haven't failed but are blighted with injury.A player like Calum Cahmbers is getting worse on the bench.He needs to play for us to see his real quality whether he's the real deal or not.We need to know.He should go on loan or be allowed to play more next season.I also don't want to see Mertesacker in the line up again.What a terrible leader he's been and I said terrible leader not player though I don't rate him he's ok.Arsene must have proper foresight and vision for this current team to succeed and that's what he lacks.Also mentality of players is terrible I don't even know how to describe it.We have small boys mentality in al most all games we play.

Good teams have the resilience and drive to bounce back from defeat, and while I do not doubt that Arsenal have the quality to do so in our next game against Southampton, it is these sort of games that may prove just how much we want it.

Theo should be a great CF but he is too quiet in games to make any real difference on a consistent basis, I have noticed how he has picked up when Henry was training with us or even Beckham, he thrived when he had top quality to watch and learn from, he hasn't had enough competition of that standard to push on his development.

442 is bad not just cos Giroud brace shouldn't make us forget who he is and how he kills the tempo of game but also cos for a 442 u need a complete midfielder to partner ur DM which cazorla isn't, he is a deeplying playmaker and ll struggle in a standard 442 cos he lacks the workrate and defensive qualities n also Ozil always struggle when he starts from the wing.

«I think we played our best game of the season, in terms of what we demand from ourselves with the quality of our attack, how early we won the ball back, how consistent we were throughout the game, the number of chances we created, and all that considering the opposition we were playing against.

BUT unfortunately those qualities rarely win you things in the modern game so whoever we are linked with, let's just hope and pray they share the same romantic views of the beautiful game as Wenger does because once managers like Pep, Moanhino, Conte signals interest in any player we want, chances are they, the players will choose these 3 over us, simply because these teams have more money than us and most tellingly these managers are recently more successful and k knows how to win whilst Wenger seems lost and bereft of ideas in the last 10 years...

He said, «He had very interesting moments in the game where he showed his qualities and how he can get out of pressure, go past people and get into the final third.

How I wish Arsenal had not sold Wellington Silva.The guy is a quality player and would've been a good option from the bench.I just don't get why he was sold.His stats may not have been impressive but if you watch him he's really good.The teams he was loaned out to earlier hardly used him and I felt he had a future here.He just needed to step up his game to be world class.He never lost any of his dribbling and skills.He'd have been the best at that if he was in Arsenal.He deserved his chance and is even better than Joel Campbell who had many chances to prove himself.

«At this stage I'm looking at how ready we are physically, how fit we are physically, how well we play the game we want to play, our mobility, the quality of our movement and passing, and the quality of our penetrations in the final third.

Leicester had three shots on target and scored three goals, so that shows you how efficient they were, but overall I must say if you look at that from a neutral point of view, for the first game it was a top - quality match.

Don't know how useful it is, as it won't tell the whole story - they are in different leagues & the quality of opposition will be different, they're in different teams with different teammate abilities, & they are at different stages in their career, plus there are other big aspects to their games not considered - but it definitely gives you an idea of their eye for goal & their finishing ability:

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

The fact you think Sanchez is a B + player because he had a bad game out of position with zero quality chances created for him during the entire 180 minutes of football we've played so far, just goes to show how far from the truth your comment is.

Of course it is still vital for Arsenal to show the quality that we possess as well as just battling through games, but put the two together and how far do you think that could take us?

I kind of like the opposite qualities of walcot and Giroud and how it changes the game play and each brings a different dimension.

«You can see that the big clubs at the top have quality, and that we have to win every game because of how tight it is at the top.

Both teams were operating with same system of 3 -4-2-1 hence they were cutting each other in tactics so as game progresses Spurs came on Top so it certainly shows how quality squad they have in there squad....

I said I hope Coquelin has a good game against City and shoves your negative comments up your Arse he did that and not me but 99 percent said of arsenal fans agreed as for watching football to be an expert no wonder you can't see a good player Ya have to play the game to have any idea of quality if I'm a sensationalist then great I had faith in him, and what's wrong with playing for Charlton to get experience Ya don't get it sitting on the bench again you know shit about how clubs use there players Enough of this back an forth crap I will wait till the end of season to see who was right about him CB

I am not saying Ozil is rubbish, far from it when you consider his assists / chances created since joining us, but no one ever mentions how many of those assists / chances created came in crunch games, semi-finals, finals, games against quality opposition.

It's about how well we play together, the quality of our game and how we want to play football.

A lot of people tend to look at tackles per game when it comes to statistically analysing the defensive qualities of a player, but a better way of looking at this aspect of the game is to see how many of the tackles are successful.

The Mexican showed his quality by scoring two late screamers in the 8 - 2 win at the weekend, but also how quickly he adapts to the pace of games and how fatigued the opposition are.

His playing ability will help us but also his leadership qualities and his ability of how to win games in a passing style.

That is what we love and we want to focus now on [how to improve], which is the quality of the work that we do and the quality of our spirit and the quality of our competitiveness which is needed in every single game.

This means when push comes to shove at these important stages of the season, the club don't have enough quality or know how to score enough goals to win games.

Asked how the Gunners can stop Everton on Sunday, Wenger added: «By keeping the quality of our game very high, by putting the tempo [on] at home, our offensive pressure on them, by maintaining our run.»

In addition, Citizen Sort lets us explore how different kinds of players, games, and tools might produce different qualities of data in the biological sciences.

Getting back into the dating game: quality dating How to get back into online dating if you've been out of it for years.

«So what we're helping you do is play these games and have a fun interactive way of getting to know yourself, and then we match you based on your own qualities, using an algorithm that shows the percentages of how compatible you are with certain people.»

However, given its age, how much it costs and the quality of the current competition, CZ can not honestly and should not be at the top of any FPS gamer's list.

i do nt have words to explain how good the visual quality of the game is, i mean from the moment game starts everything seem real and as if ur are playin a movie... gameplay mechanics are tigher and interchange b / w first person and third person is smooth... also the drebin points improves longevity of the game... but all i can say about the game is from the moment its starts and ends... u on every occasion u praises KOJIMA for his fantastic work..

i do nt have words to explain how good the visual quality of the game is, i mean from the moment game starts everything seem real and as if ur are playin a movie... gameplay mechanics are tigher and interchange b / w first person and third person is smooth... also the drebin points improves longevity of the game... but all i can say about the game is from the moment its starts and ends... u on

I don't know how so many games are produced so fast but instead of the quality dropping, it's always better and always different.»

Halo either deserves a» 10» or a» 0»:» 10» if you base the score on sales; the game's capacity in attracting new gamers to this form of electronic entertainment; on the measure of how much of a camoufalging influence «hype» can have on the actual quality of a product; and on the potential for single game to save a video game console.

The slightly shorter remake of Ratchet & Clank amounts to about 8 hours of explosive gameplay, which is fine considering how incredibly beautiful the game's Disney - Pixar quality animation is.

How about a game that combines the best qualities of Super Mario 64, Super Mario Sunshine, Super Mario 3D Land and the Super Mario Galaxies into a brand - new game?

maybe because it's the quality of creative gameplaydesign, that matters over some trivial decisions of how violent and pseudo-manly a game has to be.

The problem now with XBLA's shift in identity isn't from the quality of games listed on the service, but rather how the service handles everything it has on it.

While the game's high level of quality wasn't a surprise, what did surprise us was how well it sold beyond its hardcore audience.

The quality of life changes go a long way for both veterans and new players, making it easier to get in and learn how the intricacies of the game work, and fewer friction points lead to less players bouncing off.

Rockstar has proven their talent in game development more than enough times for us not to be worried about the quality of Red Dead Redemption 2, but the question of how monetization will be incorporated is still in the air.

Given the quantity of quality titles Nintendo has been able to bring to the 3DS and how easy the Switch is to develop for, it means although next year's true Fire Emblem game on Switch, it could easily be merely the first of more to come as a second release could also happen and that is fantastic news.

GoodEReader interviewed Ape Entertainment CEO David Hedgecock about the development of the comic and how this level of entertainment grows out of something like a game now that the technology to support high - quality digital comics and graphic novels is out there.

Moreover, something that gets lost in the arguments about credit quality is that the second - best predictor of mortgage default was how much skin in the game these buyers had, and even if Canada is not as risky as the US on lending to people with poor credit scores, we are awash in high loan - to - value lending (with its explicit government backing).