Sentences with phrase «quality of the research review»

The rigor and quality of the research review must be sustained, a process that will require training reviewers and maintaining a systematic review system.

Not exact matches

I'll research and compile for you a reviewed list of target venues that represent quality link targets for your content, including...

The journals of the American Diabetes Association work toward these goals by publishing high - quality and timely peer - reviewed diabetes research articles, review articles, case studies, and patient information.

This research stream, which is primarily conducted within ARS's National Program on Quality and Utilization of Agricultural Products, is reviewed / renewed in five - year cycles, with the next cycle starting in 2015.

In planning for MIECHV, Mathematica Policy Research, Inc., in partnership with key federal agencies under the Administration for Children and Families (ACF), launched Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness (HomVEE) to conduct a transparent and extensive review of home visiting research and assess the quality and rigor of the eResearch, Inc., in partnership with key federal agencies under the Administration for Children and Families (ACF), launched Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness (HomVEE) to conduct a transparent and extensive review of home visiting research and assess the quality and rigor of the eresearch and assess the quality and rigor of the evidence.

A review of good quality research on this subject found that if the twin that will be born first (i.e. is lowest in the womb) is head down there is no good evidence that caesarean section will be safer than a vaginal birth for the mother or babies.

We also compared the Index to the Cochrane tool for assessing Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS - I)[38], which is widely used to assess research quality in systematic reviews [59].

Development of the ResQu Index involved five distinct phases: 1) generating items and a weighted scoring system; 2) conducting expert content validation via a quantitative survey and a modified Delphi process; 3) testing inter-rater consistency; 4) assuring compatibility with established research quality checklists and 5) piloting the ResQu Index in a large systematic review to assess instrument usability and feasibility.

It's true that peer review is largely a quality control function, but one of the important qualities is whether the research is any good.

The ESRC confirms the quality of its funded research by evaluating research projects through a process of peers review.

More at www.esrc.ac.uk The ESRC confirms the quality of its funded research by evaluating research projects through a process of peers review.

And to ensure the research we fund is of high quality, all research applications undergo peer review.

Each of the products on our list was subjected to careful research and review, so feel confident that you'll end up with a quality pair.

Our experts researched and reviewed some of the best sergers on the market to bring you a top ten list of high - quality products for every level sewer.

We had our experts research and review the best rated soft tips darts to bring you a top ten list of quality, affordable options.

We made sure to research and review a variety of products to suit different uses and budgets, but one thing that will remain consistent is the quality.

Patchy quality of research training that leaves some new doctorates ill - equipped for a career either in academia or industry was another concern raised by the Roberts Review.

«This departure not only contravenes the University's own policy of having at least one member with «primary professional expertise in a scientific field relevant to the type of research reviewed by that panel,» but also prompts concern about the quality of review.»

She headed a new review of research in order to examine several measures of the quality of early childhood education specifically for dual - language learners.

«We welcome the agreement as the continued subscription access to a substantial part of the world's highest - quality, peer - reviewed research is essential to the Netherlands maintaining its position as one of the world's most impactful research nations,» said Philippe Terheggen, Elsevier's managing director of journals.

Maloney's announcement about the bill, co-sponsored by an array of congressional representatives, said it would «release federal agencies from the restrictions placed on them in 1996 that have prohibited these agencies from conducting high - quality, peer - reviewed research into gun violence prevention.»

«Our review of the literature showed several positive trial results, but we also found important research limitations in the studies, indicating a need for higher quality, more definitive trials on antidepressant use for postsurgical pain.»

«I agree that competition is good, and that peer - review is one means of assuring that we are selecting high quality projects,» he said, adding that at least some of DHS - funded research projects — including proposals funded through the agency's Centers of Excellence at universities — were indeed selected using peer - review.

I spent the majority of my time divided between competitive intelligence research, business plan development, and the quality - assurance (QA) research review team.

CIHR President Alain Beaudet said the agency will heed Philpott's 5 July request to «convene a working meeting in the very near future with key representatives of the research community, including those who have raised this issue publicly, to find common ground and move forward with solutions that address the issues raised with regard to the quality and integrity of CIHR's peer review system.»

«CIHR embarked on the reform of its open funding programs and peer review process to improve the sustainability of our health research system, the transparency and fairness of our granting processes, and the quality and impact of the research supported by federal investments,» he wrote.

The awards will be given out based both on the quality of the research and the ability of the author to convey potential policy implications, so it will help if the student has had the research previously peer reviewed and published.

It has also reviewed hundreds of thousands of reports to aid in distinguishing the best - quality research from weaker work, including studies on such subjects as the effectiveness of charter schools and merit pay for teachers, which have informed the ongoing debate about these issues.

It describes itself as «a peer reviewed journal aiming to communicate high quality research articles, short communications, and reviews in the field of natural products with desired pharmacological activities.»

To implement these reporting practices, most journals rely on the process of peer review — in which other scholars review research findings before publication — but relatively few journals measure the quality and effectiveness of the process.

In their report, Hirsh - Pasek, Zosh, Golinkoff and colleagues present a comprehensive review of research from many disciplines related to the science of learning, offering a set of four evidence - based principles that can be used as guide, both by developers creating new products and by parents hoping to find high quality games for their children.

The monthly, peer - reviewed Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine is the official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, a professional membership society that improves sleep health and promotes high quality patient centered care through advocacy, education, strategic research, and practice standards (www.aasm.org).

Philippe Terheggen, Elsevier Managing Director Journals, said: «We welcome the agreement as the continued subscription access to a substantial part of the world's highest - quality, peer - reviewed research is essential to the Netherlands maintaining its position as one of the world's most impactful research nations.

Other presentations addressed radiation concepts, radon occurrence and health hazards, risk and probability, the renal toxicity of uranium, ground - water science and water quality, uranium in situ leach mining, elements of the proposed NUAKHP, and requirements for approval of human health studies by the Navajo Nation's Human Research Review Board.

Journal of Genomics is a peer - reviewed journal publishing papers of high quality in all areas of gene, genetics, genomics, proteomics, metabolomics, DNA / RNA, computational biology, bioinformatics, and other relevant areas of research and application.

Journal of Bone and Joint Infection (JBJI) is a peer - reviewed journal publishing papers of highest quality in all areas of bones and joints research.

The core aim of the journal, however, is still to provide researchers and students with high - quality, novel reviews, commentaries, and discussions and, above all, to foster an appreciation for the advances being made on all fronts of genetic research.

The research community can explore and familiarize themselves with the quality of these data sets, review the data formats provided from our sequencing service, and augment their own research with additional summaries of genomic variation across a panel of diverse individuals.

This award was instituted by the ACMG Foundation for Genetic and Genomic Medicine to encourage ABMGG, international equivalents or genetic counselling trainees in their careers and to foster the publication of the highest quality research in ACMG's peer - reviewed journal, Genetics in Medicine.

In a substudy, review outcomes were also compared across different types of clinical research, based in large part on the designations and definitions derived from a number of sources, including a report by Nathan, 14 the Institute of Medicine, 20 the NIH Director's Panel on Clinical Research, 9 the Association of American Medical Colleges and American Medical Association, 21 and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.22 All 3599 R01 applications involving human subjects that were submitted to NIH for the October 2002 council were categorized into 1 of the following: (1) patient - oriented studies of mechanisms of human disease (bench to bedside); (2) clinical trials and other clinical interventions; (3) patient - oriented research focusing on development of new technologies; (4) epidemiological studies; (5) behavioral studies (including studies of normal human behavior); (6) health services research; and (7) use of deidentified humanresearch, based in large part on the designations and definitions derived from a number of sources, including a report by Nathan, 14 the Institute of Medicine, 20 the NIH Director's Panel on Clinical Research, 9 the Association of American Medical Colleges and American Medical Association, 21 and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.22 All 3599 R01 applications involving human subjects that were submitted to NIH for the October 2002 council were categorized into 1 of the following: (1) patient - oriented studies of mechanisms of human disease (bench to bedside); (2) clinical trials and other clinical interventions; (3) patient - oriented research focusing on development of new technologies; (4) epidemiological studies; (5) behavioral studies (including studies of normal human behavior); (6) health services research; and (7) use of deidentified humanResearch, 9 the Association of American Medical Colleges and American Medical Association, 21 and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.22 All 3599 R01 applications involving human subjects that were submitted to NIH for the October 2002 council were categorized into 1 of the following: (1) patient - oriented studies of mechanisms of human disease (bench to bedside); (2) clinical trials and other clinical interventions; (3) patient - oriented research focusing on development of new technologies; (4) epidemiological studies; (5) behavioral studies (including studies of normal human behavior); (6) health services research; and (7) use of deidentified humanResearch and Quality.22 All 3599 R01 applications involving human subjects that were submitted to NIH for the October 2002 council were categorized into 1 of the following: (1) patient - oriented studies of mechanisms of human disease (bench to bedside); (2) clinical trials and other clinical interventions; (3) patient - oriented research focusing on development of new technologies; (4) epidemiological studies; (5) behavioral studies (including studies of normal human behavior); (6) health services research; and (7) use of deidentified humanresearch focusing on development of new technologies; (4) epidemiological studies; (5) behavioral studies (including studies of normal human behavior); (6) health services research; and (7) use of deidentified humanresearch; and (7) use of deidentified human tissue.

It was also agreed that research assessment and evaluation should reflect the values of an organization and that these should include the quality and reliability of research output, but contributions to teaching, open science, peer review, and activities that impact society more broadly should be criteria for judging researchers.

CHICAGO, Jan. 21, 2016 — Children who still have moderate to severe post-operative pain one month after a surgical procedure are at risk for deterioration of their health - related quality of life, according to research reported in The Journal of Pain, the peer - review publication of the American Pain Society www.americanpainsociety.org.

Another deserving effort in promoting scientific integrity in China is to foster a healthy research environment, which includes making explicit research ethics policies, issuing a practical code of conduct, establishing a credible and authoritative national organization to supervise local units, protecting whistle - blowers, building a rigorous and fair peer review system, revising the criteria for promotion and reward to emphasize research quality rather than quantity by a researcher, and achieving zero tolerance for unethical research behaviors.

1) Relying on scientific merit review (also called «peer review») to judge the quality and relevance of research proposals.

A 2002 review of the research on SAMe and depression conducted by the federal Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality concluded that SAMe was more effective than placebo at relieving the symptoms of depression and no better or worse than triresearch on SAMe and depression conducted by the federal Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality concluded that SAMe was more effective than placebo at relieving the symptoms of depression and no better or worse than triResearch and Quality concluded that SAMe was more effective than placebo at relieving the symptoms of depression and no better or worse than tricyclics.

A 2015 Cochrane review of current research on cryotherapy also came to a similar conclusion: «There is insufficient evidence to determine whether whole - body cryotherapy (WBC) reduces self - reported muscle soreness or improves subjective recovery after exercise compared with passive rest or no WBC... Further high - quality, well - reported research in this area is required and must provide detailed reporting of adverse events.»

«Given that the majority of studies included in our review weren't well - designed trials, better - quality research on this topic is needed to better inform consumers and clinicians as to whether foot [orthotics] or shock - absorbing insoles can be used to decrease injury risk,» he said.

A new systematic review of the research finds early evidence that yoga may reduce the incidence of various forms of heart disease, but concludes that more high quality studies are needed before making definitive recommendations.

A team of German researchers systematically reviewed all of the published yoga research up until October 2013 to ascertain yoga's effectiveness in reducing «mortality, nonfatal cardiac events, exercise capacity, health - related quality of life, and modifiable cardiac risk factors» for those with a prior diagnosis of coronary artery disease, heart failure, cardiac dysrhythmia, cardiomyopathy or valvular heart disease.

A large number of peer - reviewed research, including long - term randomized controlled trial data, has demonstrated that growth hormone replacement improves energy, strength, cardiac function, blood pressure, cholesterol levels, insulin sensitivity cognitive function, immunity, and psychologic well - being; decreases body fat; increases lean muscle; prevents and reverses heart disease; prevents and improves osteoporosis; and improves quality of life.