Not exact matches
Since the No Child Left Behind Act went into effect in 2002, more
data than ever have been made available on schools, the
quality of their teachers, and their student
achievement.
Provides comprehensive
data for individual states in the following categories: summary
of grades, student
achievement, standards and accountability, efforts to improve teacher
quality, school climate, resources: equity and spending.
To the contrary, the Loveless study cited above offers some support for the proposition that high performers suffer systematically from the focus on closing the
achievement gap, while there is limited
data that grouping all students together improves the
quality of education for struggling students.
The issue
of the relative
quality of private and public schools was at the core
of our research, and we relied on both
data on school resources and day - to - day operations and on student
achievement scores.
New empirical work, using better
data (e.g., that enable researchers to estimate the relative impact
of factors affecting student
achievement growth from year to year) and more - sophisticated statistical techniques has, in broad terms, reinforced the Coleman Report conclusion that teacher
quality is the most important schooling variable.
But since the report's publication, scholars have developed more precise
data on teacher effectiveness, and, by probing at differences in teacher
quality within schools, have found very large impacts
of teacher
quality on student
achievement.
The
quality of configurations and personalised experiences that we see in classrooms have a direct correlation and a very short line between how well that teacher is collecting, analysing, managing and using student
achievement data.
The National Institute
of Child Health and Human Development Study
of Early Child Care and Youth Development (NICHD SECCYD) collected detailed information on
achievement, social development, family experiences, child - care
quality, and schooling for roughly 1,300 children at regular intervals from birth on, yielding
data that have resulted in numerous influential papers on child care and family background effects on early
achievement and social adjustment.
Under the NCLB Extended approach, embraced by many on the education reform / civil rights Left,
achievement would continue to be measured by proficiency rates alone (with rising annual goals for what is good enough); growth
data would be used sparingly and / or focused on «growth to proficiency»; «other indicators
of student success or school
quality» would be minimized; and evidence
of achievement gaps would sink schools» ratings significantly.
While impressive
data sets were assembled on the
achievement levels
of thousands
of students in public and private schools, statisticians could not be sure whether observed differences reflected the
quality of the schools or the students who self - selected into them.
Since the provision didn't require the use
of student test
data in measuring teacher
quality (focusing instead on certification and other qualifications that have no positive correlation to student
achievement), it should be removed from the law.
Data - driven decision - making within a professional learning community: Assessing the predictive
qualities of curriculum - based measurements to a high - stakes, state test
of reading
achievement at the elementary level.
Evaluation
of the National Assessment
of Educational Progress (2009) addresses issues identified by Congress concerning the
quality of the National Assessment
of Educational Progress (NAEP), including whether NAEP is properly administered, produces high
quality data that are valid and reliable, and is consistent with relevant widely accepted professional assessment standards; and whether student
achievement levels are reasonable, valid, and reliable.
For the first time in the history
of American public education, federal education policy set clear goals for improving student
achievement in reading and mathematics, and finally focused attention on using
data in measuring teacher
quality.
Their findings described VAM as an imprecise and unstable measure
of teacher effectiveness, particularly if the student assessment
data are not
of high
quality or do not cover a sufficient number
of years from which to predict student
achievement with any degree
of accuracy.
FairTest's review
of the
data highlights the ways in which MCAS score gains may owe more to luck than
quality and may fail to reflect genuine
achievement for all students.
(p. 36) This professional learning should be aligned to teacher evaluation
data and will improve the
quality and effectiveness
of teachers, principals, and administrators and improve student academic
achievement.
The
Data Quality Campaign (DQC) is a national, collaborative effort to encourage and support state policymakers to improve the collection, availability and use of high - quality education data and to implement state longitudinal data systems to improve student achievem
Data Quality Campaign (DQC) is a national, collaborative effort to encourage and support state policymakers to improve the collection, availability and use of high - quality education data and to implement state longitudinal data systems to improve student achie
Quality Campaign (DQC) is a national, collaborative effort to encourage and support state policymakers to improve the collection, availability and use
of high -
quality education data and to implement state longitudinal data systems to improve student achie
quality education
data and to implement state longitudinal data systems to improve student achievem
data and to implement state longitudinal
data systems to improve student achievem
data systems to improve student
achievement.
It collects educational
achievement data at the 4th and 8th grades to provide information about trends in performance over time together with extensive background information to address concerns about the quantity,
quality, and content
of instruction.
Levy describes the processes and criteria Expeditionary Learning schools have developed to collect
data on students»
achievement in three areas: mastery
of knowledge and skills; students» character and engagement in their learning; and whether students are producing high -
quality work.
The Coleman Report came under intense fire, but re - analyses
of the Coleman
data and the collection
of new
data in the decades since it appeared support its finding that the
quality of public schools doesn't make much difference in student
achievement.
In the 2014 legislative sessions, more than 80 bills in 32 states addressed student -
data protection issues, according to the Data Quality Campaign, a Washington - based group that seeks to promote the use of educational data to improve student achievem
data protection issues, according to the
Data Quality Campaign, a Washington - based group that seeks to promote the use of educational data to improve student achievem
Data Quality Campaign, a Washington - based group that seeks to promote the use
of educational
data to improve student achievem
data to improve student
achievement.
According to a review by the National Council on Teacher
Quality, a Washington, D.C. - based reform group, 20 states in 2012 required student
achievement as a significant part
of judging teacher performance, including multiple states where student
data accounts for 50 percent
of an evaluation.
In 2007, David Wright, the director
of the California State University system's Center for Teacher
Quality analyzed how graduates from Northridge compared to those from other teacher preparation programs in the state by looking at student
achievement data.
The multilevel modelling
of student
achievement, both in terms
of educational
quality and equality, using
data from large - scale international assessments best characterizes his current research emphasis and trajectory.
Reliance on standardized
achievement test scores as the source
of data about teacher
quality will inevitably promote confusion between «successful» instruction and «good» instruction.
Two crucial misconceptions have framed recent efforts to improve the
quality of U.S. schools: (1) the conflation
of achievement with learning accompanied by the misuse
of achievement data, and (2) the erroneous belief that meaningful changes in school
quality can be coerced through a national regimen
of testing and accountability.
A key mechanism for determining the effectiveness
of this proficiency - based system is the use
of Education
Quality Reviews that incorporate quantitative and qualitative data in five dimensions of school quality: academic achievement, personalization, safety and school climate, high - quality staffing, and financial effici
Quality Reviews that incorporate quantitative and qualitative
data in five dimensions
of school
quality: academic achievement, personalization, safety and school climate, high - quality staffing, and financial effici
quality: academic
achievement, personalization, safety and school climate, high -
quality staffing, and financial effici
quality staffing, and financial efficiencies.
Create an accessible repository
of high -
quality data on student
achievement, policies and practices in the largest urban charter management organizations across the country
However, the tests must be aligned with the state academic content standards, address the depth and breadth
of such standards, and be equivalent in content coverage, difficulty, and
quality to the state - designed assessments AND must provide comparable, valid, and reliable
data on academic
achievement, as compared to the state - designed assessments, for all students and for each subgroup
of students among all local school districts within the state.
Exceptional billing - related
data entry skills and a commitment to providing outstanding customer service ensure
achievement of high
quality standards.
As research across neuroscience, developmental psychology, and economics demonstrates, early social - emotional, physical, and cognitive skills beget later skill acquisition, setting the groundwork for success in school and the workplace.15 However, an analysis
of nationally representative
data shows that 65 percent
of child care centers do not serve children age 1 or younger and that 44 percent do not serve children under age 3 at all.16 Consequently, child care centers only have the capacity to serve 10 percent
of all children under age 1 and 25 percent
of all children under age 3.17 High -
quality child care during this critical period can support children's physical, cognitive, and social - emotional development.18 Attending a high -
quality early childhood program such as preschool or Head Start is particularly important for children in poverty or from other disadvantaged backgrounds and can help reduce the large income - based disparities in
achievement and development.19
NACCHO's plan is to develop a series
of Report Cards to Members using
data consented to by Member Services to summarise the
achievements, continuous
quality improvement and outcomes being delivered by the ACCHO Sector.
NACCHO's plan is to develop a series
of Report Cards to Members using
data consented to by Member Services to summarise the
achievements, continuous
quality improvement and outcomes being delivered by the ACCHO Sector as well as identifying areas
of concern and gaps in service accessibility where additional resources and money are required.