Sentences with phrase «quality patent system»

Under their leadership, improvements have been made to H.R. 1249 that promote a more balanced, higher quality patent system.

Not exact matches

Many startups rely on patents to protect their intellectual property, but allowing low - quality patents to flood the system not only enables trolls to file abusive lawsuits, it also delegitimizes the entire patent system.

As the world's first patent - pending water replication system, the New York WaterMaker will enable restaurants to elevate their food and beverage taste and quality by allowing chefs to cook with NYC water anywhere in the world.

Using a waterproof recording video inspection camera and a 20 - meter - long probe to visually identify the source of failure, the patent - pending Tetra Pak Membrane Scope provides visual confirmation of the source of poor permeate quality and product loss in spiral - wound filtration systems.

In July 2014, the company developed and launched its catering «Smart Box» to ensure the same quality of food and experience as in each store via the patented catering system.

The patented system was developed by HEINEKEN as a means to consistently provide a freshly brewed beer taste in an easy to install format, without compromising the quality that consumers demand.

This unique trike features the patented Touch Steering system that allows stroller - quality manoeuvrability for an easy and smooth ride.

Lead author Yarden Katz, a fellow at the center and in the department of systems biology at Harvard Medical School in Boston, says they were interested in examining the relationship between NIH funding and metrics widely used to indicate scientific quality and determine career advancement, such as publication, citation, and patent counts.

eHarmony's patented Compatibility Matching System ® was developed after years of research to identify the qualities that best predict marital satisfaction.

Our patented Compatibility Matching System ® matches you with highly compatible single men and women with whom you can build quality relationships.

eHarmony is hardly neutral when it comes to finding that special Swiss single with the help of our patented system, designed to find the very best quality matches for you in this small but varied country.

Eharmony is hardly neutral when it comes to finding that special swiss single with the help of our patented system, designed to find the very best quality matches for you in this small but varied country.

The custom - built CORSA stainless steel exhaust system employs the company's patented Reflective Sound Cancellation ™ (RSC) technology to optimize interior and exterior sound quality.

The Florafelt Pro System is a high quality patented vertical garden solution that uses water wicking Florafelt Grow Strips woven into a galvanized (or stainless) wire grid to create a drip - free water distribution system for growing a high - density arrangement of plants on System is a high quality patented vertical garden solution that uses water wicking Florafelt Grow Strips woven into a galvanized (or stainless) wire grid to create a drip - free water distribution system for growing a high - density arrangement of plants on system for growing a high - density arrangement of plants on walls.

Introduced under the America Invents Act, Inter Partes Review is a post-grant patent proceeding formulated with the intent to establish a more efficient system to improve patent quality and limit unnecessary counterproductive litigation and has become a powerful tool in patent litigation strategy.

The appropriate conclusion is to downsize the patent system and prioritize quality over quantity.

Truck cargo nets, Diamondback covers, Bully Pac Mule bed organizer Graham Solutions manufacturers high quality custom unique pickup truck cargo management systems, other vehicle convenience products and offers consulting services for web site development and patent licensing.

Even more is at stake for an American patent system swamped by millions of low - quality patents, many of them — like the one belonging to Alice Corp — related to software.

In the short term, however, the Supreme Court's decision is unlikely to do much to flush away many of the millions of low - quality patents already in the system.

Addressing the key set of Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) funding and patent quality reforms are critical for maintaining a modern and effective patent system.&Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) funding and patent quality reforms are critical for maintaining a modern and effective patent system.&patent quality reforms are critical for maintaining a modern and effective patent system.&patent system.»

CPF believes in a strong and fair patent system that fosters innovation and job creation that will improve the quality of patents and ensure that small, medium and large companies have the ability to protect their intellectual property and create new products.

In recent years, the USPTO has come under increasing scrutiny over the quality of its patent examinations.1 The growing push for reform of the patent system is fueled by the rapid rise of technology, financial services, telecommunications, and other innovations driving the information economy, all straining the USPTO's ability to evaluate and issue quality patents.2 Problems with patent quality occur when the Patent Office grants patents on claims that are broader than what is merited by the invention and the prior art. 3 In fact, a number of these problematic patents have been issued and publicized to much fanfare, including the infamous Smuckers» peanut butter and jelly patent where the company asserted a patent on their method of making the UncrustiblesTM crust-less peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, among others.4 These «bad» or improvidently granted patents impact the USPTO's ability to promote overall patent quality which, I will show, has serious implications for the public dpatent examinations.1 The growing push for reform of the patent system is fueled by the rapid rise of technology, financial services, telecommunications, and other innovations driving the information economy, all straining the USPTO's ability to evaluate and issue quality patents.2 Problems with patent quality occur when the Patent Office grants patents on claims that are broader than what is merited by the invention and the prior art. 3 In fact, a number of these problematic patents have been issued and publicized to much fanfare, including the infamous Smuckers» peanut butter and jelly patent where the company asserted a patent on their method of making the UncrustiblesTM crust-less peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, among others.4 These «bad» or improvidently granted patents impact the USPTO's ability to promote overall patent quality which, I will show, has serious implications for the public dpatent system is fueled by the rapid rise of technology, financial services, telecommunications, and other innovations driving the information economy, all straining the USPTO's ability to evaluate and issue quality patents.2 Problems with patent quality occur when the Patent Office grants patents on claims that are broader than what is merited by the invention and the prior art. 3 In fact, a number of these problematic patents have been issued and publicized to much fanfare, including the infamous Smuckers» peanut butter and jelly patent where the company asserted a patent on their method of making the UncrustiblesTM crust-less peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, among others.4 These «bad» or improvidently granted patents impact the USPTO's ability to promote overall patent quality which, I will show, has serious implications for the public dpatent quality occur when the Patent Office grants patents on claims that are broader than what is merited by the invention and the prior art. 3 In fact, a number of these problematic patents have been issued and publicized to much fanfare, including the infamous Smuckers» peanut butter and jelly patent where the company asserted a patent on their method of making the UncrustiblesTM crust-less peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, among others.4 These «bad» or improvidently granted patents impact the USPTO's ability to promote overall patent quality which, I will show, has serious implications for the public dPatent Office grants patents on claims that are broader than what is merited by the invention and the prior art. 3 In fact, a number of these problematic patents have been issued and publicized to much fanfare, including the infamous Smuckers» peanut butter and jelly patent where the company asserted a patent on their method of making the UncrustiblesTM crust-less peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, among others.4 These «bad» or improvidently granted patents impact the USPTO's ability to promote overall patent quality which, I will show, has serious implications for the public dpatent where the company asserted a patent on their method of making the UncrustiblesTM crust-less peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, among others.4 These «bad» or improvidently granted patents impact the USPTO's ability to promote overall patent quality which, I will show, has serious implications for the public dpatent on their method of making the UncrustiblesTM crust-less peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, among others.4 These «bad» or improvidently granted patents impact the USPTO's ability to promote overall patent quality which, I will show, has serious implications for the public dpatent quality which, I will show, has serious implications for the public domain.

Finally, today's discussion draft focuses on litigation system, rather than targeting the root cause of the problem: the flood of low - quality, over-broad software patents.

In addition to the concerns we have above, we wish the bill addressed quality issues — the root of most of the problems with the patent system.

Under the law, patent recipients get the right to exclude others from using the technology for 20 years — unfortunately, the system turned toxic when the Patent Office began issuing a flood of low - quality patents and lawyers and others began buying them up and suing everyone in patent recipients get the right to exclude others from using the technology for 20 years — unfortunately, the system turned toxic when the Patent Office began issuing a flood of low - quality patents and lawyers and others began buying them up and suing everyone in Patent Office began issuing a flood of low - quality patents and lawyers and others began buying them up and suing everyone in sight.

While we strongly support the Innovation Act, we believe that further reform will be needed to bring the patent system into the 21st century and deal with the fundamental problem of low - quality software patents.

However, improving patent system transparency and patent quality are equally important.

«Small businesses are the economic engine of this country and the current system is allowing them to be targeted and abused by patent trolls armed with poor quality patents and a flawed path toward review and resolution.

A high - quality, well - functioning patent system means that holders of valid patents can be secure and confident in their intellectual property, and that small businesses targeted by invalid patents do not have to risk bankruptcy to defend themselves.