The shopping cart patent is a good example of what happens when low -
quality patents end up in the hands of bad actors — Soverain, the patent's owner, has reportedly made more than $ 70 million in settlements and lawsuits claiming it owns basic, obvious shopping cart technology.
Not exact matches
This set of resource includes: • 6 attractive PowerPoint presentations which lead the class through each of the lessons • Fun and thought provoking activities and discussion starters, worksheets and questions to reinforce the learning • 6 differentiated homework tasks • A mark sheet which allows pupils to track their own progress • An
end of unit test to prepare the students for exams or can be used as a form of assessment • A complete teacher's guide including easy to follow lesson plans • An answer booklet to help the teacher along The lessons are: Lesson 1 — Looking into ethical and moral dilemmas such as driverless cars and the impact of technology on modern life Lesson 2 — More ethical dilemmas including the ratings culture, medical apps, sharing personal data and cyber bullying Lesson 3 — Environmental issues with technology and how organisations and individuals can reduce these effects Lesson 4 — The Computer Misuse Act 1990 Lesson 5 — The Data Protection Act 1998 Lesson 6 — Copyright Designs and
Patents Act 1988 For more high -
quality resources written by this author visit www.nicholawilkin.com
My team works across the entire IP lifecycle, from promoting innovation e.g. developing an inventor compensation scheme to using our analytics tools to consider and improve
patent quality to discussing pruning of
patent portfolios as products approach
end of life.
However, the agency does not currently use information on
patent litigation in initiating such actions; some PTO staff said that the types of
patents involved in infringement litigation could be linked to PTO's internal data on the
patent examination process, and a 2003 National Academies study showed that such analysis could be used to improve
patent quality and examination by exposing patterns in the examination of
patents that
end up in court.
The paper appreciates the real harm that comes from
patent trolls and recognize the risk that low -
quality patents represent when they
end up in
patent trolls» hands.
Three of the most high profile proposals are: (1) the Saving High - tech Innovators from Egregious Legal Disputes (SHILED) Act «forces
patent trolls to financial responsibility for frivolous lawsuits»; (2) the Patent Quality Improvement Act expands the AIA by allowing more businesses to be covered under the transitional program for business method patents; and (3) the End Anonymous Patent Act, which requires the owner of patents to register with the
patent trolls to financial responsibility for frivolous lawsuits»; (2) the
Patent Quality Improvement Act expands the AIA by allowing more businesses to be covered under the transitional program for business method patents; and (3) the End Anonymous Patent Act, which requires the owner of patents to register with the
Patent Quality Improvement Act expands the AIA by allowing more businesses to be covered under the transitional program for business method
patents; and (3) the
End Anonymous
Patent Act, which requires the owner of patents to register with the
Patent Act, which requires the owner of
patents to register with the UPSTO.
The Innovation Act doesn't solve every
patent problem — most noticeably, it doesn't tackle the fundamental issue of
patent quality — but it's a strong step that would help
end users and businesses, both big and small.
We're still reading it, but the paper appears to appreciate the real harm that comes from
patent trolls and recognize the risk that low -
quality patents represent when they
end up in
patent trolls» hands.