Changes in biological activity are an important part of the carbon cycle but are difficult to
quantify at the global scale.
Results allow the complex relationship between climate and growth ring parameters to be
quantified at the global scale for the first time.
Not exact matches
«The same calculations can be included in stream network models, which would allow researchers to better
quantify the impacts of nitrate pollution
at local, continental and even
global scales,» said co-author Morvarid Azizian, a postdoctoral scholar in civil & environmental engineering
at UCI.
«This is the best attempt, published to date, to bring together the available data to
quantify fisheries impacts on sharks
at a
global scale,» says John Musick, a shark expert
at the Virginia Institute of Marine Science in Gloucester Point.
«Recommendation 2: The Committee recommends research and development investment to improve methods of carbon dioxide removal and disposal
at scales that would have a
global impact on reducing greenhouse warming, in particular to minimize energy and materials consumption, identify and
quantify risks, lower costs, and develop reliable sequestration and monitoring.»
Within the confines of our work with RASM and CESM, we will: (i)
quantify the added value of using regional models for downscaling arctic simulations from
global models, (ii) address the impacts of high resolution, improved process representations and coupling between model components on predictions
at seasonal to decadal time
scales, (iii) identify the most important processes essential for inclusion in future high resolution GC / ESMs, e.g. ACME, using CESM as a test bed, and (iv) better
quantify the relationship between skill and uncertainty in the Arctic Region for high fidelity models.
These are more uncertain and they are difficult to
quantify, but they tend to offset the impact of albedo changes
at the
global scale.