Hart correctly emphasizes that for Heidegger thinking is an «attentive awaiting on the mystery
of being as such,» while the
sciences «are
of their
nature quantitative investigations
of the physical realm» and thus concentrate on measuring extant «things.»
In contrast to the aesthetic order implicit in Kukai's view
of nature and contemporary
science and process thought, the «logical order»
of mainline Christianity characterized by Ames assumes: (1) preassigned patterns
of relatedness, a blueprint» wherein unity is prior to plurality, and plurality is a «fall» from unity; (2) values concrete particularity only to the degree it mirrors this preassigned pattern
of relatedness; (3) reduces particulars to only those aspects needed to illustrate the given pattern, which necessarily entails moving away from concrete particulars toward the universal; (4) interprets
nature as a closed system
of predetermined specifications, and therefore reducible to
quantitative description; (5) characterizes being as necessity, creativity as conformity, and novelty as defect; and (6) views «rightness» as the degree
of conformity to preassigned patterns (NAT 116).
Daniele Fanelli is a Leverlhulme research fellow at the University
of Edinburgh, UK, where he uses advanced
quantitative methods to help settle long - standing philosophical and sociological debates on the
nature of science.