«The more
any quantitative social indicator is used for social decision - making,» he wrote, «the more subject it will be to corruption pressures and the more apt it will be to distort and corrupt the social processes it is intended to monitor.»
It holds that «[t] he more
any quantitative social indicator [e.g. standardized testing] is used for social decision - making, the more subject it will be to corruption pressures.»
In education we commonly refer to Goodhart's Law's interdisciplinary cousin — Campbell's Law instead, which states that «the more
any quantitative social indicator (or even some qualitative indicator) is used for social decision - making, the more subject it will be to corruption pressures and the more apt it will be to distort and corrupt the social processes it is intended to monitor.»
Donald T. Campbell's 1976 paper presented a theory about social change that is now widely revered as Campbell's Law: «The more
any quantitative social indicator is used for social decision - making, the more subject it will be to corruption pressures and the more apt it will be to distort and corrupt the social processes it is intended to monitor.»
But, in a predictable paradox, by attaching their incentives agenda to standardized testing, the reform movement has induced cheating on a never - before - seen scale, proving the maxim known as Campbell's Law: «The more
any quantitative social indicator is used for social decision - making, the more subject it will be to corruption pressures and the more apt it will be to distort and corrupt the social processes it is intended to monitor.»
This principle, penned by the social scientist Donald T. Campbell in 1976, suggests that «the more
any quantitative social indicator is used for social decision - making, the more subject it will be to corruption pressures and the more apt it will be to distort and corrupt the social processes it is intended to monitor.»
Not exact matches
The indices provide real - time linguistic and psychological analysis of news and
social media, converting qualitative
indicators - such as fear, performance forecasts, and trust in management - into
quantitative, actionable insight.
This brief focuses on
quantitative data and
indicators to measure adolescent health,
social development and well - being.