Both relativity and
quantum theory break with the assumptions of modern physics and call for fundamental reconstruction of the scientific program.
Not exact matches
However, I do not believe that the view represented by the neurosciences has absorbed the implications of the revolutionary developments of the twentieth century in physics, in particular the physical
theory of
quantum mechanics, developed originally to account for atomic phenomena, where the Newtonian
theory breaks down.
General relativity
breaks down,
quantum physics also fail us and all other
theories are JUST
theories and can not be duplicated or proved since the conditions can not be duplicated.
Eccles has a
theory that the smallest area of a vesicle in a synapse that can be enough to trigger the activation of a neuron falls below what
quantum physics would allow for an effect without
breaking Newtons third law.
The Planck scale is the unimaginably small distance at which current
theories of gravity and
quantum physics
break down.
The reason why nothing can be smaller than the Planck length is because at that point, current physical
theory breaks down because it is impossible to describe anything beyond TP without a theoretical understanding of
quantum gravity, which we don't have.
Scientists are currently struggling to unify the pair into one
theory of
quantum gravity, and some candidate
theories predict that the equivalence principle
breaks down at the
quantum level.
Niedra
broke with many other scientists in a letter following an interview, writing that while Mills's
theory butts up against popular interpretations of
quantum mechanics, «in fact, however,
quantum mechanics may permit such [hydrino electron] levels.»