Well Mr Rose, you have asked
me a question about extreme weather events and climate.
As I read further, from the context, he appears to be referring to a specific
question about extreme weather — yet his rhetoric seems to be aimed at implying a broader conclusion about the intellectual clarity, and motives, of the scientists he calls «alarmists.»
Despite the understanding gained through this study, many
questions about extreme weather events remain.
Not exact matches
«In the past, a typical climate scientist's response to
questions about climate change's role in any given
extreme weather event was, «We can not attribute any single event to climate change.»
Here is the # 1 flawed reasoning you will have seen
about this
question: it is the classic confusion between absence of evidence and evidence for absence of an effect of global warming on
extreme weather events.
«So it seems that the answer to my
question about whether an actual statistical signal for anthropogenic
extreme weather events has emerged to a greater level of confidence since the last IPCC report is no, not definitively.
In the past, a typical climate scientist's response to
questions about climate change's role in any given
extreme weather event was, «We can not attribute any single event to climate change.»
Climate Myths: We keep reading
about how the
extreme weather of 2017 is the «new normal» thanks to global warming — even if the
weather in
question is frigid air.