As for
your question about nuclear energy — it's incredibly cheap, and not to mention incredibly safe.
12:33 - First, though, Caroline Lucas, the Green party MP, is asking
a question about nuclear energy.
Not exact matches
Failing this sort of bold action, Hofmeister sees North America entering an «
energy abyss» by the end of the next decade, the result of land (mis) management, an irrational aversion to
nuclear power, and 50 years of ignoring serious
questions about our resource base and the infrastructure that powers society.
For the first part of your
question only (national security threat), from an author I don't fully agree with on Uranium and Russia (he thinks the sanctions on Russia are really
about natural gas and he thinks the sanctions are foolish)- he proves that Russia is a large producer of Uranium while the US is seeing a decline in production and imports quite a bit of Uranium for
nuclear energy production (sourced from the EIA).
At the same time, new
questions have emerged, and there's still a lot to learn
about the basic
nuclear properties that drive the chain reaction and its impact on
energy production here on Earth and elsewhere in our universe.
While all such forecasts are implicitly uncertain, this one helps clarify where to focus efforts to cut greenhouse gas emissions; reinforces the importance of resolving
questions about how to safely expand, while not stopping, extraction of vast domestic reserves of natural gas; and powerfully challenges proponents of accelerated deployment of today's menu of renewable
energy technologies or
nuclear power plants to lay out a credible strategy for supplanting coal.
It examines
questions about the safety and costs of
nuclear power relative to coal and other choices for electricity generation, along with the risk of proliferation of
nuclear weapons and emissions of greenhouse gases relative to other
energy sources.
What to do
about existing plants, and how to chart a sustainable
energy future with (or without)
nuclear power are entirely separate
questions.
A new Pew Research Center survey finds that most Americans can answer basic
questions about several scientific terms and concepts, such as the layers of the Earth and the elements needed to make
nuclear energy.
These are the kinds of
question that make
nuclear power qualitatively different from just
about every other part of the
energy and climate puzzle that many governments are struggling to solve at the moment.
There are unanswered
questions about the role played by John Geesman, Attorney for Alliance for
Nuclear Responsibility and former California
Energy Commissioner
The unfolding catastrophe occurring at the Fukushima plants also raises serious
questions about our reliance on
nuclear energy and its status as a clean and safe source of power.