Julian Jackson (left) in the audience as Doug Parr of Greenpeace asks
a question about nuclear power.
Not exact matches
Failing this sort of bold action, Hofmeister sees North America entering an «energy abyss» by the end of the next decade, the result of land (mis) management, an irrational aversion to
nuclear power, and 50 years of ignoring serious
questions about our resource base and the infrastructure that
powers society.
In September last year, the government advised against new building developments on coasts threatened by erosion, which raises
questions about the proposed expansion of the Sizewell
nuclear power complex.
A terrific thriller that incidentally raises the most unsettling
questions about how safe
nuclear power plants really are.
> I think that your comments have a bit of «begging the
question»
about them, in suggesting that the necessity of expanding
nuclear power to reduce GHG emissions from electricity generation is an established fact, upon which any «debate»
about addressing AGW must be based — rather than an unproven assertion to be argued.
So those of us who are concerned
about climate change, we've got to recognize that
nuclear power, if it's safe, can make a significant contribution to the climate change
question.
While all such forecasts are implicitly uncertain, this one helps clarify where to focus efforts to cut greenhouse gas emissions; reinforces the importance of resolving
questions about how to safely expand, while not stopping, extraction of vast domestic reserves of natural gas; and powerfully challenges proponents of accelerated deployment of today's menu of renewable energy technologies or
nuclear power plants to lay out a credible strategy for supplanting coal.
It examines
questions about the safety and costs of
nuclear power relative to coal and other choices for electricity generation, along with the risk of proliferation of
nuclear weapons and emissions of greenhouse gases relative to other energy sources.
What to do
about existing plants, and how to chart a sustainable energy future with (or without)
nuclear power are entirely separate
questions.
These are the kinds of
question that make
nuclear power qualitatively different from just
about every other part of the energy and climate puzzle that many governments are struggling to solve at the moment.
Think
about and answer this
question: Why do we need
nuclear power?
The unfolding catastrophe occurring at the Fukushima plants also raises serious
questions about our reliance on
nuclear energy and its status as a clean and safe source of
power.
More on the Japan
Nuclear Crisis Mini-FAQ
About Japan's
Nuclear Power Plant Crisis 6 Important
Questions About the Crisis at Japanese
Nuclear Power Plants Update on Japan's
Nuclear Crisis at Fukushima I