Sentences with phrase «question during an argument»

By the way, you wouldn't want to ask that question during an argument, because it will just draw out the fighting and give your child more ammunition.

Not exact matches

«It's a form of argument that I thought you would have known, which is called the «reduction to the absurd,»» Scalia told Hosie of San Francisco during the question - and - answer period.

During oral arguments, several justices questioned whether the federal anti-corruption law — also used in the Skelos case — was too vague and being interpreted too broadly.

Whereas Michael Boxer could have recommended immediate reinstatement that could have made me «whole» again, he chose to conclude his own internal report that was three years delinquent by stating that, «Serious questions are raised about Mr. Iritano and record falsification,» which was simply not true, and firmly supported by the Transit Authority's complete reversal of all misconduct allegations against me during oral argument in Appellate Court, Second Department, on May 9, 1991.

New York's top court on Tuesday heard arguments on the controversial issue of aid in dying, and judges seemed skeptical during questions from the bench.

Questions during the Q&A portion of the press conference included his plans during his scheduled visit to Albany on March 4th, why he expects to convince legislators who he has not convinced, whether he's concerned that the middle school program will be pushed aside if there is a pre-K funding mechanism other than his proposed tax, where the money to fund the middle school program will come from, how he counters the argument that his tax proposal is unfair to cities that do not have a high earner tax base, how he will measure the success of the program absent additional standardized testing, whether he expects to meet with Governor Cuomo or Senate Republican Leader Dean Skelos during his March 4th trip, what he would say to a parent whose child planned on attending one of the charter schools that his administration refused to allow, whether he doubts Governor Cuomo's commitment or ability to deliver on the funding the governor has promised, what are the major hurdles in trying to convince the state senate to approve his tax proposal, whether there's an absolute deadline for getting his tax proposal approved, whether he can promise parents pre-K spots should Governor Cuomo's proposal gointo effect, and why he has not met with Congressman Michael Grimm since taking office.

You can work on your thesis for 100 years, and professors will still question some of your arguments during your thesis defense.

And if you heard the skeptical questions from the justices during oral arguments, today's conclusion comes as no surprise.

The question for the justices during much of the oral arguments today was whether they granted review of the right case to resolve that issue.

They then make revisions to their argument and practice presenting their opinion with their group, brainstorming possible questions that could be asked during a trial.

But whether that lack of perfection is good enough for all students was the question thrown to the state's highest court during arguments on the adequacy portion of the Gannon v. Kansas school finance lawsuit.

During the arguments, justices lamented the lengthiness of the case, which started in 2010, and questioned what kind of remedy they could offer to help failing students while still preserving the education being offered to the ones that succeed.

The question for the justices during much of the oral arguments last week was whether they granted review of the right case to resolve that issue.

Virginia Rutledge, counsel for The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts (which filed a friend of the court brief in the case), told A.i.A., «The outcome can't be predicted based on questions raised during oral argument, but the Court has before it very compelling arguments for Prince's transformative use of Cariou's imagery and the significance of the First Amendment speech interests at stake, and was openly dismissive of allegations of market harm.»

Thirdly, he then during question period a few days later repeated his messaging in a very public forum and again stood by his argument that few women and minorities are applying for positions on the bench so that's why the government isn't appointing them.

«She has an inflated opinion of herself, and is domineering during oral arguments, but her questions aren't penetrating and don't get to the heart of the issue.»

3) Question: I told my girlfriend during an argument that I really had to leave, but she was adamant that I stay and she climbed on to the hood of my car.

While most of the curriculum at Harvard during this time consisted of lecture and student recitation, skills development was also provided in the form of weekly moot courts, during which students argued questions of law before professors and submitted occasional written disputations on legal subjects.121 Although Stearns had previously used moot courts in his teaching at Harvard, Story and Ashmun refined them.122 Cases were handed out the week before argument, and two counsel were assigned to each side.123 The cases would then be argued the next Friday, with the other students taking notes of the argument; the professor in charge that week would issue a written opinion.124

She has also delved deep into the likely questions a judge or justice will ask during oral argument, often pinpointing the vulnerabilities that need to be addressed to win the case.

The Justices had very few questions for the attorneys representing the Fund and instead aimed most of their questions at the plaintiff attorney during his oral argument.

If the question of whether use of torture in military interrogations of terrorist suspects were a law school exam question, I would bet that Yoo would have gotten extra points for coming up with the «self - defense» argument, or for arguing that executive power during a time of war trumps other considerations.

During plaintiff counsel's closing argument, the judge questioned counsel about something that no one touched upon at trial: could the mugshot have been taken when the inmate was in his cell?

The ruling came as a surprise to many Court watchers given Justice Roberts» hostility to the Voting Rights Act during questioning at oral argument.

Chief Justice John Roberts has said of this trend, «It is too much...» Although, of course, no one has to worry about Justice Clarence Thomas, who has not asked a question during oral argument for eight years.

During oral argument in an appeal of the Shaw Industries matter, two judges of the Federal Circuit closely questioned the USPTO's counsel concerning the PTAB's use of redundancy as a means to pare issues in AIA review proceedings.

The judges presiding over your appeal may ask clarifying questions to your lawyer during oral argument.

Though I would have answered «yes» to all of these questions, the biggest reason came together during our closing arguments after the hearing.

For simplicity during arguments it focused on gender as the protected characteristic in question.

-LSB-...][121] Styled in a Notice of Constitutional Question, but also raised during his argument, Mr. Pollock wishes the Court to consider his ability to act as a «McKenzie Friend» notwithstanding -LSB-...] Secondly, the role of the McKenzie Friend was limited to assisting the litigant and giving advice to the litigant, not advancing argument, cross-examining or performing any other functions that -LSB-...] However, if he held himself out to be available as a McKenzie Friend to all and sundry, or proposed to charge a fee for his services, then I believe different -LSB-...]

During oral arguments in the Highmark case, there was a great deal of questioning over potential disparities between cases if more deference were to be given to the district courts, and whether the Federal Circuit would deliver more uniformity.

We recently watched an appellate argument in a child custody dispute where the panel directly questioned the father's counsel about his failure to pay support or try to see his child during the pendency of his appeal.

«It's a very extraordinary animal in legal culture to have two different proceedings addressing the same question that lead to different results,» Chief Justice John Roberts noted during Monday's oral arguments.

«It's a very extraordinary animal in legal culture to have two different proceedings addressing the same question that lead to different results,» Chief Justice John Roberts said Monday during oral arguments in Cuozzo Speed Technologies v. Lee.

On this subsidiary issue the Chief Justice was also clear in stating that such an «invitation» should not be given as the appellate court should not go beyond raising questions during oral argument.

After we showed this animation to the judge during the claim construction hearing, and after the accompanying argument, he eventually began reciting the tag - line of «insert, pivot, and lock» himself in addressing questions to counsel.

However, on further appeal to the Court of Appeal the arguments retrenched onto the particular (and odd) facts of the case which did not concern the question of earnings during the notice period at all, so that Norton Tool was only being argued tangentially.

The question in the title of this post is the primary uncertainty likely to impact Supreme Court debate over Florida's capital punishment system during tomorrow's scheduled oral argument in Hurst v. Florida.