Sentences with phrase «question in a different way»

So when you're interviewing candidates, it's very important to ask the same question in different ways to get the truth.

If you run a loss - making company, you can not forever keep raising, and you look at that question in a different way.

Let me ask the above question in a different way.

Let us put the question in a different way.

But when I started asking the question in a different way, that's when the girls» enthusiasm for salad bars began to show.

In addition, the surveys asked different questions in different ways, which in some cases made it difficult to compare results.

Through in - depth analysis one can elicit subconscious answers — these can be accessed both in a therapy setting or exploring these questions in different ways, like a course, to gain the tools.

If they really don't get it, ask the question in a different way, and see if the first brave soul gives the class something to snack on.

AM: OK, we'll ask the question in a different way then.

If this is true, we can then ask the same question in a different way.

«We ask questions in a different way and look at our relationships as long term.

As an alternative, perhaps there is someone else in the Dot Earth community who will help make the question understandable by responding to it or by stating the question in a different way.

* If the interviewer keeps circling back and re-asking basically the same question in different ways, that means that he's not happy with how your response is coming across.

Two statisticians might pose the question in a different way, and the trick is to work out which is the correct question to ask in a given situation.

Many people have divided up the question in different ways, including my part 2 note where I looked specifically at Fellows of the American Geophysical Union.

Insurance companies want a lot of information, and different companies ask the same questions in different ways.

Sometimes the interviewer will ask the question in a different way, such as, «Why should I hire you?»

The truth is we all ask ourselves this question in different ways.

@Tom Goans, I agree that once you reach the point of being debt - free on your properties, your ability to survive downturns becomes fairly easy but let me ask the question in a different way because you've got enormous experience at this.

Not exact matches

We did this in a whole bunch of areas, where you just get to a very different way of thinking and a very different answer when you ask this question.

This is a book that does ask a similar kind of question, but in a very different way.

The CEO struggled to answer the question, naming Google, Apple, Amazon, and Microsoft as «overlap [ing]» with Facebook in different ways.

You only have to come up with the questions — the bulk of the «content» is created by your interviewee — and then, you can produce and syndicate your content in a number of different ways, including video, audio, and written transcripts.

Eventually, as he told me, he was also led to see that other writers had dealt with such questions too, and had answered them in somewhat different ways.

She also doesn't address the question we're all trying to approach in our different ways, which I'd characterize this way:

It wasn't the summer that brought an end to my doubt, but it was the summer I encountered a different Jesus, a Jesus who requires more from me than intellectual assent and emotional allegiance; a Jesus who associated with sinners and infuriated the religious; a Jesus who broke the rules and refused to cast the first stone; a Jesus who gravitated toward sick people and crazy people, homeless people and hopeless people; a Jesus who preferred story to exposition and metaphor to syllogism; a Jesus who answered questions with more questions, and demands for proof with demands for faith... a Jesus who healed each person differently and saved each person differently; a Jesus who had no list of beliefs to check off, no doctrinal statements to sign, no surefire way to tell who was «in» and who was «out»; a Jesus who loved after being betrayed, healed after being hurt, and forgave while being nailed to a tree; a Jesus who asked his disciples to do the same...

Just as there are many different auto manufacturers making various styles and models of cars that are in no way as complex as life forms, we know without question they have a designer.Dosn «t it defy reason to not believe in a grand design and a grand designer?

That question is being answered in many different ways in this generation, but the final judgment on sexual action is what it means for the fulfilment of persons now and throughout life.

But then, in true techie fashion, he and I start to outline and enumerate the different ways that we see techies approach the «many religions» question: 1.

As noted in the introduction, I am also making another, different kind of assumption that readers will make use of these questions in whatever way seems most helpful.

We come back to the question, to which Schleiermacher and Barth gave very different answers, about the extent to which the Christian message can be fitted in to contemporary ways of thinking.

Hence the question: Are Americans really losing interest in religion, or are they looking for it in different ways?

So, to me, the real question becomes do you, as a devout Christian, vote for someone that has rejected the Bible and its Christian tenets in favor of a different path to salvation, or someone that actually does believe in the Bible and its Christian tenets but interprets those tenets in a less literal way that seems to run counter to your more literal beliefs?

The authors of Scripture do not always speak with one voice, but this is because they are presenting the question of the character of God in different ways.

The question is, why should the future, if defined in these two different ways be the same?

There was some question whether Whitehead holds that God exercises his objective immortality in two different ways and that the giving of the initial aim is quite distinct from the superjective nature.

This lack is doubly troubling for the woman writer who is a feminist, because feminism as a movement for transforming patriarchal structures and relations of domination understands change in a quite different way from that of the individualistic biographic tradition presupposed by the question of how one's «mind has changed.»

And in that case the question as to whether God would be in any way different if He did not know what He does know would not arise.

The way in which Virginia approached the question of religious liberty was very different from the path chosen by Massachusetts and other states, but the Virginia way has become the standard by which American liberals today measure the relations of church and state» and even of religion and society.

Thus it is that we can question whether doctrine is right or wrong, true or false, in a way that is quite different from the way we might question somebody's faith.

The anthropologist and the historian not only ask different questions of the same material — they conceptualize it in different ways.

Here are some what if questions asked by Perry Noble which might lead you to think about church in a different way.

My co-authors and I discovered as much in our interviews for Habits of the Heart when questions about individuality triggered some of the most stereotypical language we encountered: it seems that «we're all unique; we're all different» in exactly the same way.

But at least some of the questions we face are different from the questions Paul faced, and in order to answer those questions, we may need to explain the Gospel in new ways.

The way that Christians, with seeming generosity of spirit, extend the love of Jesus to atheists or believers in different gods raises some other questions.

For then it would be open to question whether one is dealing with a concept which is possible but which can correspond to no possible reality, or rather with the concept of something truly real.9 In contrast to these different possible dialectical ways in which the initial concept of a universal becoming can be used, Whitehead's categoreal system aims to describe it unmistakably as the fundamental truth: «The ancient doctrine that «no one crosses the same river twice,» is extendeIn contrast to these different possible dialectical ways in which the initial concept of a universal becoming can be used, Whitehead's categoreal system aims to describe it unmistakably as the fundamental truth: «The ancient doctrine that «no one crosses the same river twice,» is extendein which the initial concept of a universal becoming can be used, Whitehead's categoreal system aims to describe it unmistakably as the fundamental truth: «The ancient doctrine that «no one crosses the same river twice,» is extended.

I remember being in some church meetings way back when the pastors told the congregation, suspiciously in the absence of the people in questions, why certain people left, only to find out that things were actually much different.

Each of our commentators would answer those questions in a slightly different way.

Secondly, the opposite danger exists, that of cultural leveling... In this way one loses sight of the profound significance of the culture of different nations, of the traditions of the various peoples, by which the individual defines himself in relation to life's fundamental questionIn this way one loses sight of the profound significance of the culture of different nations, of the traditions of the various peoples, by which the individual defines himself in relation to life's fundamental questionin relation to life's fundamental questions.

The theistic question was asked then in a way far different from ours: it did not concern primarily the origin and maintenance of the universe.