Sentences with phrase «question in such a way»

I think that is the first time someone has answered my question in such a way where I was able to grasp it.

It is an old trick of religious leaders to frame the answer to serious questions in such a way that the burden is immediately put back on the asker.

One way to reduce the abstainers» tendency to lie is to frame the turnout question in such a way that these abstainers are given the opportunity to claim that they adhere to the norm even if they did not vote.

eHarmony is known to reject applicants for reasons such as a history of divorce or if you answer the questions in such a way that they consider you «unmatchable».

Did you answer a question in such a way that makes a match think you are obsessed with marriage and children?

You just need to set your search parameters carefully and answer your questions in such a way that reflect the priority you place on spiritual matters.

I found myself answering the profile questions in such a way as to «knock their socks off» or posting the «best» profile picture....

A few profiles answered this question in such a way that would have affected my decision to contact them (were I single, obviously).

Avoid positioning matching test questions in such a way that the list is separated in two by a page break.

If you believe that the defendant is not telling the truth, ask the questions in such a way that you expose the facts.

Many times insurance companies would try to ask the questions in such a way as to transfer fault to you rather than its insured party.

Contact us for your career coaching needs and to learn how to answer interview questions in such a way that because of your answers to interview questions, you're the one who receives the job offer!

Not exact matches

Key points about your background, experience, and achievements may go on one page, questions for the interview on another... but then place those notes in such a way that you won't be heard shuffling through papers.

In addition to tactics such as guest posting, answering questions on Quora can also be a good way to become a recognized industry authority and gain more followers and subscribers in the procesIn addition to tactics such as guest posting, answering questions on Quora can also be a good way to become a recognized industry authority and gain more followers and subscribers in the procesin the process.

It should also be written in such a way that the reader can easily follow along without asking questions.

Data can be served up intuitively, in a way that answers key questions, such as: «What are my reps talking about?»

The real question is does it take more faith to believe that mass and energy came into existence in such a way to (relatively) evenly displace it throughout the universe that came into existence at the same time, or did it come together in such a precise manner to create a supreme being that could design and build a universe after the fact?

This is one of the problems that often hinders dialogue with radical atheists (not sure you are one, but you did answer a question I posed to people who believe God is a fantasy)-- rather than offer a defense they will attack in such a way as to obfuscate the purpose of the original discussion.

Thus Evangelical Catholicism's approach to church architecture, decoration, music, vesture, and all the other tangibles of the Church's liturgical life proceeds from the question, «Is this beautiful in such a way that it helps disclose the living God in Word and Sacrament?»

Eventually, as he told me, he was also led to see that other writers had dealt with such questions too, and had answered them in somewhat different ways.

In the earliest stages of a religion people are typically looking for ways to explain the unexplainable, such as why it rains, why natural disasters happen, why people get sick, there are seasons, what the stars are, and countless other questions for which current science had no answer thousands of years ago.

Explain away enough details of scripture in such a way and the wisdom of the rest comes into question.

So long as their questions remain unanswered, they feel in no way morally bound to cooperate with such good purpose as they can discern.

So too, in every such location there are questions about the justice of the ways in which social, economic, and political power are distributed and how that distribution affects the people who live there.

Such a question is often, even usually, interpreted in a way that is very far from my intention.

Part of the problem the way the question is posed is by assuming that we can abstract an ethical ideal from one part of scripture and use it to judge the actions of God in another part of scripture, as though scripture were given us so we could form such dehistoricized abstract ethical judgments!

The three questions can serve as horizons within which to conduct rigorous inquiry into any of the array of subject matters implied by the nature of congregations, disciplined by any relevant scholarly method, in such a way that attention is focused on the theological significance of what is studied:

It respects people's intelligence and freedom and sovereignty and instructs in such a way that allows them to question and explore and discover on their own.

I've found that the answers to questions such as these (those which ring true, at least) tend to be those which are arrived at in my own way and own time, rather than being delivered by others.

It is finding new ways, in a new situation, tentatively yet critically, to rework doctrines such as Christology, pneumatology, eschatology and ecclesiology, taking into account the new questions that have arisen.

Though final answers are still along way off, it is significant that we can now begin to frame such questions in a scientific way.

As the work of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa illustrated, religious people can raise such questions in the public sphere in a particular way.

Yet when God is interpreted in this fashion, the consequence is that such a negative attitude towards novelty and change is given augmented power and those who think in this way consider their own established interests divinely approved and heavenly sanction given to their own rejection of developments which would call these interests in question.

Within that tradition, both in its political and ecclesial expression, authority is a way of ordering power within a community in such a way that, at one and the same time, it supports and augments common beliefs and ways of life and is regularly and harmoniously conjoined with a structure of offices that gives order to the exercise of authority and power within the particular society in question.

But we should now ask if there is a way in which we can speak intelligibly of «resurrection» without having such questions to plague us.

It is also the only way to avert the execution of persons who did commit the crime in question, but did so under circumstances of mitigation or diminished capacity such that capital punishment would not normally have been imposed had the circumstances been more fully understood.

And, oh, when the hour - glass has run out, the hourglass of time, when the noise of worldliness is silenced, and the restless or the ineffectual busyness comes to an end, when everything is still about thee as it is in eternity — whether thou wast man or woman, rich or poor, dependent or independent, fortunate or unfortunate, whether thou didst bear the splendor of the crown in a lofty station, or didst bear only the labor and heat of the day in an inconspicuous lot; whether thy name shall be remembered as long as the world stands (and so was remembered as long as the world stood), or without a name thou didst cohere as nameless with the countless multitude; whether the glory which surrounded thee surpassed all human description, or the judgment passed upon thee was the most severe and dishonoring human judgement can pass — eternity asks of thee and of every individual among these million millions only one question, whether thou hast lived in despair or not, whether thou wast in despair in such a way that thou didst not know thou wast in despair, or in such a way that thou didst hiddenly carry this sickness in thine inward parts as thy gnawing secret, carry it under thy heart as the fruit of a sinful love, or in such a way that thou, a horror to others, didst rave in despair.

The church has never identified God with Jesus in such a way as to raise questions about the continuance of God's functions of sustaining the creation independently of Jesus.

Although the explicit denial of bodily form to Yahweh was late, the early depreciation of interest in any such question forced Hebrews to think of God in some other way.

7 Such questions are idle except as a help to the imagination, by way of making concrete, in an actual historical situation, the bearing of the principles that Jesus laid down.

Some things, we think, are simply beyond such questioning, and the person who does not see things that way is lacking in essential humanity.

This new tone is the language of Scripture, a tapestry of citations and allusions woven together in such a way that what the Council teaches will appear ultimately as the Scripture applied to the point in question.

This is why it is always wise to responds to such people with as much grace and dignity as you can muster, for your response to them in this way might be just the thing that helps them see that it is okay to question tradition and follow the Spirit's leading away from institutional religion.

To put the question this way would seem to leave churches without individual bishops, such as the United Presbyterian Church, out in the cold.

Before addressing such questions, I want to emphasize that I am in no way opposed to social - movement politics.

By approaching the question of mind and nature in this way Whitehead is able to provide us with an aesthetically rich understanding of nature, which at the same time preserves a necessary role for reason and the search for truth as an indispensable element in the determination of conscious experience, the enhancement of our aesthetic sensibilities, and the general advancement of civilization as such.

Christ as Power is God's dynamic authority revealed in such a way that there can be no question of any other power being able to overcome it.

If such talk is construed objectively, as asserting that God is in some way the object of human experience, the fact that «God» must be understood to express a nonempirical concept means that no empirical evidence can possibly be relevant to the question of whether the concept applies and that, therefore, God must be experienced directly rather than merely indirectly through first experiencing something else.

In any event, in a closely parallel discussion of the very same question, of how problematic terms like «know» or «love» as applied to God are to be classified, he in no way appeals to psychicalism, but argues instead that, although they are «in such application not literal in the simple sense in which «relative» can be,» they nevertheless «may be literal if or in so far as we have religious intuition» (1970a, 155In any event, in a closely parallel discussion of the very same question, of how problematic terms like «know» or «love» as applied to God are to be classified, he in no way appeals to psychicalism, but argues instead that, although they are «in such application not literal in the simple sense in which «relative» can be,» they nevertheless «may be literal if or in so far as we have religious intuition» (1970a, 155in a closely parallel discussion of the very same question, of how problematic terms like «know» or «love» as applied to God are to be classified, he in no way appeals to psychicalism, but argues instead that, although they are «in such application not literal in the simple sense in which «relative» can be,» they nevertheless «may be literal if or in so far as we have religious intuition» (1970a, 155in no way appeals to psychicalism, but argues instead that, although they are «in such application not literal in the simple sense in which «relative» can be,» they nevertheless «may be literal if or in so far as we have religious intuition» (1970a, 155in such application not literal in the simple sense in which «relative» can be,» they nevertheless «may be literal if or in so far as we have religious intuition» (1970a, 155in the simple sense in which «relative» can be,» they nevertheless «may be literal if or in so far as we have religious intuition» (1970a, 155in which «relative» can be,» they nevertheless «may be literal if or in so far as we have religious intuition» (1970a, 155in so far as we have religious intuition» (1970a, 155).

The question, therefore, is whether such a concept of a cause to which the infinite reality of pure act belongs as a factor constituting it without becoming an intrinsic constituent of the entity of the finite cause itself, but in some way remains free, detached from the process of becoming, but provides the real ground of the self - transcending operation of the finite agent itself, is a valid and demonstrable concept, or only a paradoxical and intrinsically self - contradictory construction which can only conceal the fact that our thought has reached an impasse.