The question is meaningless without determining how much money you have invested.
Your question is meaningless as it is, because you don't tell us if you're likely to be in a higher bracket when you retire, or lower.
I think
the question is meaningless because there is no standard of how «wide» or «narrow» the base of a political party must be, a practical guide to tell us (in the ideological dimension) what a «political party» is and what a «coalition» is.
This question is meaningless unless you first define The word «powerful» in the context of your question.
Perhaps
the question is meaningless, because genuine future is that which is radically new, which can not be foreseen.
I get that
some questions are meaningless, ridiculous, vague, unimportant and such, but then label them such.
The whole speculative thrust of these schools was, from the Buddhist point of view, misguided or unenlightened, for the very good reason that
its questions were meaningless.
Until you answer
it your questions are meaningless.
Not exact matches
But here
's an interesting
question for you:
Is social media really that
meaningless a distraction?
Questions about purpose become
meaningless since there
is no longer an intelligence or guiding hand giving inherent meaning to anything that occurs in nature.
Not content merely to
question the legitimacy of particular rulings, theorists like Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. and Robert Lee Hale pointed to the example of the lottery and liquor decisions to argue that traditional legal categories like «commerce,» «due process,» «police power,» or «public»
were essentially
meaningless.
Lots of
meaningless words intended to maintain the status quo and avoid the hard
questions, such as «where
's the evidence for your delusions?»
Asking «why» about some things
is a
meaningless question.
We can declare all other
questions meaningless on the grounds that they can not
be settled by empirical evidence.
Moreover, if all the formal possibilities
are not controlled, we not only run the risk of fallaciously inferring the truth of one view from the difficulties of some only of its possible rivals, hut also we run the risk of trying to answer a perhaps
meaningless question, namely, Which of two falsehoods (or absurdities)
is more false?
as an actual scientist, it
's more important to ask «how things work» than to ask empty
meaningless questions like «why
are we here» or «what happens when we die».
But
questions of this kind appear to the great German scholar to
be both irrelevant and
meaningless.
The words used in traditional forms have become
meaningless and have no performative value, or, if they have, it
is open to
question whether the evidence for their effectiveness can
be found in church attendance or some kind of social action.
0f course, one could take the middle ground which may
be the position of objective relativism and say that the
question whether the past changes
is a
meaningless question because we have no way of verifying the proposition.
In my opinion, if a
question doesn't directly better somebody
's life in a significant way, it
's meaningless.
So my
question is this: How does that logic not make our understandings of right and wrong completely arbitrary and
meaningless?
It
is notable that no biological science has
been able to express itself apart from phraseology which
is meaningless unless it refers to ideals proper to the organism in
question.
Griffin's official (i.e., fully explicit) answer to this
question is that Premise X
is meaningless.
I think your
question precisely contains the answer of why I fail to see that everything
is meaningless because that meaning «
is diminished or non existant in the future.»
If every consequence of action
were intrinsically equal in value, or equally lacking in value, or if the
question of better and worse
were simply a matter of whim, moral responsibility would
be meaningless.
Thus it
is meaningless to ask the
question: What
is a physical system such as a nebula, an atom or a solar system for?
If no one can prove god, then all the following issues,
questions, and assertions you wish to consider
are meaningless..
One senses that many of these other philosophers have not known what to make of this strange character who asked all the
questions they held to
be irrelevant or
meaningless and believed many things they thought absurd.
It
is a
meaningless, unanswerable
question, an argument about possibility and potential, and a crown that can only really
be awarded in retrospect».
Pretty
meaningless assessment, other than begging the
question if that
's what it takes why haven't Stoke won the PL several times?
The
question of whether the labor should have
been induced suddenly seemed
meaningless, and I forgot about it — until about a year later.
Tangentially, your
question doesn't seem to make any effort to establish why conservatism would in any way
be opposed to transhumanism (unless you mistake conservatism for Genesis literalism), which makes it somewhat
meaningless in another dimension
Added to the fact that it
is a highly loaded
question (even someone massively anti-NHS will struggle to disagree with «Whatever problems the NHS may have, its commitment to free treatment for everyone means it
is still one of our great national symbols») and the poll
is pretty much
meaningless now.
Which
is a very interesting
question because it
's so
meaningless and stupid, and yet the fact that identical twins had an 80 percent correlation coefficient on that, even though they'd
been separated at birth, I find fascinating.
A debate rages on whether President Reagan did or didn't have Alzheimer's disease during his time in office.With what we have learned in the last decade about the disease, the
question is relatively
meaningless, except perhaps to score political points.The simple answer: of course he did.The newest technology — consisting of imaging and spinal taps — shows that the disease process begins its relentless course as many as 15 years before a firm diagnosis.
The world inside those walls
was chaos, and what I learned there
is that the
question of who
's «right» about where the voices come from
is beyond
meaningless.
He finds his life
is empty and
meaningless, but he doesn't really know why, nor does the film honestly answer that
question.
Many of the
questions are worded so badly that the results
are rather
meaningless.
«There
's no
question that Elizabeth Natale has captured the mood among classroom teachers who
are caught in the straitjacket of the Common Core and the entire regimen that evaluates teachers on the basis of their students» scores on virtually
meaningless standardized exams,» said author Jonathan Kozol, who wrote the classic «Death at an Early Age» about his first year teaching in Boston.
An individual suffering from existential depression
questions the meaning of life and often feels it
is meaningless.
«The right of libraries to communicate, by dedicated terminals, the works they hold in their collections would risk
being rendered largely
meaningless, or indeed ineffective, if they did not have an ancillary right to digitize the works in
question,» the court said.
Could there
be more
meaningless questions to analyze?
Now your
question is added to my haunting burdens...
are you truly roleplaying if the game offers you no choice or if the choice
is essentially
meaningless?
Such a statement
is meaningless, however, unless the
question of why those materials became signifiers for an entire generation
is considered.
«In a world saturated with spectacle and the kind of augmented reality made possible through the digital, Irwin's work, by contrast, raises critical
questions about the fundamental nature of how and what we perceive and the value of «looking at and seeing all of those things that have
been going on all along but previously have
been too incidental or
meaningless to really enter into our visual structure, our picture of the world.
The big
questions, such as the end of painting with the birth of photography, or the polarization between abstraction and representation,
are just
meaningless in the world of Postmodern thought.
If you can not answer those
questions I would suggest that you
are indulging in
meaningless hand - waving.
But in that case, the concept
is meaningless as a moral criterion: it leaves open the
question of what
is the good of individual men and how does one determine it?
But the 25 percent «mandate»
was so
meaningless it begged the
question of why it existed in the first place.
Thus tolerance for Risk
is meaningless in such
questions; Uncertainty removes all sense of Risk entirely, no cost / benefit formulation, no statistical distribution containing a mean, no Risk preference can
be expressed.