Sentences with phrase «question much thought»

I never really gave this pivotal question much thought, vaguely imagining, as many of us do, that I'd stumble upon some kind of spontaneous meeting — maybe I'd meet my dream guy while browsing Victorian literature in a bookshop or standing in line for a concert.

If you asked me why veterinary practices have exam rooms, I'd have to admit that before now, I hadn't given the question much thought.

I found that while most students had not given this question much thought, they found it very helpful in articulating their life orientation and providing an opportunity to learn about themselves.

Those who think that human rights is a «motherhood issue» around which all rational people can unite have not given the question much thought.

Not exact matches

And with many questioning the sustainability of importing so much food from so far away, we are beginning to ask if switching to a vegetarian diet to cut emissions caused by meat production is as sustainable as one might think.

And so while we can squabble about just what Justin Trudeau should or should not do, our effort is much better spent thinking about the question one level up, as some commentators have already begun doing: Should sitting Members of Parliament like Trudeau accept paid speaking engagements?

Above all, spend time thinking about the most important question that Instagram's new offerings could help you answer: How much closer can you bring your community?

All kidding aside, let's take this thought process one step further and let me ask you this question: How much is each one of your employees worth to your company?

She also offers an explanation for what you need to think about around each question, so check out the post in full for much more detail.

I think asking typical interview questions can be like a game, but social interaction is much harder for someone to rehearse.

Neither of them had given any thought to the equity question, much less to whether they'd have to pay this administrator more than they paid themselves.

The key takeaway is much the same as Olds» — just take a little time to ask a few questions and think things over before you exercise your admirable frankness.

I have ignored reasons that might justify lower discount rates or higher GDP adjustments for China mainly because the purpose of this essay is to explain why the U.S. multiple is so much higher than China's, and of course these reasons exist, but I think whatever the correct ratio should be, there is no question that advanced economies always justify higher multiples than developing economies because they tend to be economically more diversified and politically more stable, and they usually have institutions, including clearer legal and regulatory frameworks, more sophisticated capital allocation processes, less rigid financial systems, and smaller state sectors (which make smooth adjustment, one of the most valuable and undervalued components of long - term growth, more likely).

Second question, on asset quality, how much more do you think — I mean, you talked about potentially improving and NPL ratios getting lower.

[30:08] Life is too short to suffer [31:01] It's the thoughts that are stressful that you believe that mess you up — when you question them, you break the pattern [31:20] The more you train yourself to do it, the easier it becomes [31:40] Don't wait to be rich, richness is joy and abundance [32:01] Loss, Less, Never: the sources of all suffering [32:06] The antidote is to see it for what it is, know it's «BS,» and find something to appreciate [33:49] So much of our life has become about expectation.

From this question, now you can derive how much money you honestly think will make you happy.

But think twice about asking the common salary interview question, «How much do you currently make?»

To answer your first question, Cy, I don't think foreign participation matters too much, partly because I don't think foreign firms will ever play a significant role in the Chinese economy except in a few consumer areas, but mostly because they have no systematic impact on the way growth is generated.

I think this is a great question because not everyone that is influential (especially in the B2B world) spends as much time tweeting, blogging and posting Instagram photos as many of the influencers listed above do.

He cites a large imprudent acquisition as being one of the only things that could derail his love for Berkshire today, and says that the question of who will succeed Buffett is an important one, he thinks both Buffett and the company have done much to prepare for that eventuality, and he sees the company as being a great one for many years to come.

During the brand's first - quarter 2018 earnings call on April 12, when asked about passenger ticket revenue, Delta CEO Ed Bastian said the company was thinking about diversified revenue streams, and said «there's no question, our non-ticket-based revenues... And it's been for some time now, it's been growing at a much faster clip than the ticket revenues.

My question... is getting peoples insights into whether to diversify some more or something different altogether... there is simply so much time ahead of him, its hard to pin down a strategy, even the Vanguard Retirement 2065 is not far enough away to accommodate the time in front of him, he'll only be 56 by then, but I want to help him and set the strategy out before I shuffle off the mortal coil so he doesn't really need to think about pensions etc. as he grows up, comments / suggestions welcome... Cheers

But, you know, a question I think some listeners would ask is that, you know, how do I now decide how much to put into each asset class?

Only when I began to think for myself and to question what I had been told, did I see that the «other side» had some valid points — I simply didn't want to hear them, much less attempt to understand them.

The truth and the church we love deserve from parties on all sides of these questions clear thinking, honest speaking, mutual respect — and much prayer and fasting.

So, while I agree with much of what you are saying, and appreciate your thought - provoking questions, I feel I recoil a little at what seems to me like the very arrogance you claim to despise.

I think the reason he dwells of God so much is because relgious people can't stop questioning him about it and he lives in a world where people seem to have to believe in God.

you can ask questions all you want, test it as much as you like but only you can decide to believe.I have studied hell, read my books about, went to different websites and searched the bible, for a Christian to fear hell is not possible.For one Christ himself said he is the only way to the father.So I think the fear of hell comes from guilt or their power freaks.

Yet on second thought, Douthat's question might not unsettle the reader as much as he hopes.

I have gotten rambling a little here but my question to you your thoughts on this statement: «If money or rather the established institution that is the world market, is the reason that throughout at leastthe past few decades, than it would be right to take from those who have much much more than they need and give to those who are at least the poorest of the world, those in need.»

You didn't think about my question very much and I gave you two excellent hints.

I thought I pretty much covered her questions and way more succinctly than she posed them.

In either case, the questions will not always be easy to answer for someone who has not thought much about them before.

I have been going through so much spiritual questioning and testing this past year and a half... my thoughts just keep changing and evolving.

(«Earlier much futile thought had been devoted to the question of whether photography is an art.

It is always true of Dasein that «I am it»; but in a discussion where what «be» means is precisely what is under question — above all when made grammatically finite in the first person (see SZ 24 = BT 46)-- this tells us much less than we might think.

Having opined in public previously on the question of what makes evangelical theology evangelical, he reports a recent breakthrough in his own thinking: It's not so much a set of....

But we forget that God knows and made everything, his ways are so much higher and thoughts so unimaginable, that who are we to question him.

the reminder that Orthodox theology continually refreshes its thinking by reference to the early Church Fathers, who were much concerned with the question of God's activity in the other sects and traditions and in the wisdom of humankind.

I think that one way to reframe the question of «what would Jesus do», is to not so much to be sitting still looking for direction, but to be constantly be asking the question in every action or reaction that we make through the day.

Nobody thought much of religions other than Christianity; as was obvious by our public school pledge — which admonished us all to be good Christian citizens... Sure, I had questions too, but our church was pretty low - key so I was safe from some of the more radically - minded (read: brainwashed) of my peers.

It just seems that people like Hawking ignore religion completely when a HUGE part of science is questioning all beliefs including your own which I don't think human beings do as much as they should, or respect other people's opinions.

With exacerbation in their voice, they urge me to stop reading so much, stop thinking so much, and stop asking so many uncomfortable questions.

This broad, liberal creed supported by a set of idealistic categories that never questioned seriously the progressive revelation of the mind of God in the existing personal and social relationships of man has been too much at home in this prosperous world to need to call out a rebellious Danish religious prophet who challenged the very categories of its thought.

My question was aimed for the majority of peope that also disagree with you as much as me and cling to their faith so violently that if someone even broaches the subject, they immediatly lash out and try to either convert the unbeliever, condem him, or bring up the inane, breathtakingly stupid argument of «I can't prove there is a god, but you can't prove there isn't so we're at an impass» — I think that argument is probably the most frustrating thing EVER

I think I decided to pursue it as a full book because I came to realize that the somewhat specific culture of «hipster Christianity» was actually indicative of much broader tensions and paradoxes in contemporary Christianity dealing with identity, image, and the question of cool.

I question if you have been thinking much at all beyond trying to one up me.

Hartshorne, I think, can not answer such questions and admits as much in a statement, which, though parenthetical to the prior statements I have cited, indicates just how far we are from an analytically clear understanding of divine knowledge: «If this [knowing fear without being afraid] is a paradox so is any idea of adequate knowledge» (CSPM 263).

The question of «who is a Christian» is much bigger than you think.

With respect to doctrinal questions (as distinct from ethical questions) I think there is far too much emphasis in most churches on what you are required to believe, which results in relationship - ending events over inconsequential stuff.