That, then Mr. Chairman, is more or less what I wanted to say on
the question of constitutional amendment.
Not exact matches
The newspaper endorsed the state
constitutional amendment that legalized medical marijuana and backs the approval
of a 2016 Nevada ballot
question to allow legal recreational marijuana.
In that case Justice Rehnquist wrote that Alabama has the right to enforce government - sponsored prayer in public schools, and even to establish a state - sponsored church if it wants to — which
questions the premise (based on the Fourteenth
Amendment) that
constitutional prohibitions on infringement
of rights extend to the states.
Here, too,
questions could be raised, but the fact is that on immigration the U.S. bishops take pretty much the position
of the Wall Street Journal, which, only half tongue in cheek, calls for a
constitutional amendment abolishing national borders.
«While the Convention
Question won't be on the front
of the ballot where it should be, voters will at least be urged to turn the ballot over to vote on whether to hold a
Constitutional Convention and on two
Amendments proposed by the Legislature.
The last time New York actually passed
amendments proposed by the
constitutional convention was 1938 when they voted for six
of nine sets
of amendments (there were actually 57
amendments but they were organized in nine different
questions).
While remaining neutral on the actual
question of casino gambling, two good - government groups offered up criticisms
of how supporters have promoted the
constitutional amendment that will go before voters on Nov. 5.
Turnout is expected to be minimal in next week's off - cycle vote and voters will also consider two ballot
questions for
constitutional amendments: Stripping officials convicted
of felonies
of their pensions and the creation
of a land bank in the Adirondacks and Catskills parks.
«While acknowledging the potential negatives
of such a convention — e.g., the risk
of amendments being approved that would weaken the home rule authority
of local governments — the Executive Committee viewed the opportunity to strengthen the position
of municipalities in New York's governmental structure as more important and voted to approve NYCOM's support
of a «Yes» vote on the
constitutional convention
question facing New York voters this November, with the additional stipulation that municipal officials would need to run for and be elected as delegates to the convention if our intended outcomes are to be achieved,» the guide states
While remaining neutral on the actual
question of casino gambling, two good - government groups on Monday offered up criticisms
of how supporters have promoted the
constitutional amendment that will go before voters on Nov. 5.
Citizens Union and the League
of Women Voters
of New York State Page 2 Frequently Asked
Questions Regarding Redistricting
Constitutional Amendment
Voters have a more favorable view
of one
of the two
constitutional amendments that will appear alongside the convention
question this November.
Noting that the «parties devote a significant portion
of their briefs discussing the
question whether the
constitutional provisions at issue in this case are so - called «Blaine
amendments»» originally motivated by anti-Catholic nativist sentiment, the court found that «none
of the parties has produced any authority suggesting we may disregard
constitutional provisions merely because we suspect they may have been tainted by questionable motives.
Charter
of Rights and Freedoms: The Crown brought a dangerous offender application; following the hearing and submissions, counsel for Donald Joseph Boutilier served a notice
of constitutional question in relation to several
amendments to s. 753
of the Criminal Code.
because «such a construction
of the Sherman Act would raise important
constitutional questions,» specifically, First
Amendment questions.
In a thoughtful answer to a reader's
question related to Roper v. Simmons — namely, why the Missouri Supreme Court invoked the Eighth
Amendment, rather than using Missouri's own state
constitutional provision
of the same language — professor Eugene Volokh weighs in on the effect
of 51 bills
of rights:
And it goes to the very limits
of its logic, by
questioning whether even an appropriate
amendment of the Treaty would make it possible to overcome the arguments which prevent regulatory powers from being conferred on agencies or whether there are, in other words, underlying principles in Community law that are not susceptible
of constitutional amendment, which can not be reconciled with recognition
of regulatory powers in the hands
of bodies other than the three institutions.
Giving providers assurance that guidelines can be used only in their favor may be an important step toward gaining their support; but allowing such one - sided use
of evidence in a court
of law raises disturbing
questions of fairness and
of validity under the U.S. Constitution's Fifth and Fourteenth
Amendments» due process and equal protection mandates, and under state
constitutional principles as well.
Although the First
Amendment analysis could resolve the overarching
constitutional question under s. 2 (b)
of the Charter that protects freedom
of expression and media communication, specific provisions
of wiretap law, governed in Canada by Part VI
of the Criminal Code, would also have to be considered.
The
constitutional question presented by this case is whether members
of the public have a First
Amendment right to insist upon access to the transcript
of a preliminary hearing during the period before the public trial, even though the accused, the prosecutor, and the trial judge have all agreed to the sealing
of the transcript in order to assure a fair trial.
Hear perspectives from panelists such as award - winning photojournalist Mannie Garcia; John Verdi, the Director
of Privacy Initiatives at the U.S. Dept.
of Commerce and First
Amendment attorney Chuck Tobin on general
constitutional questions (i.e. search and seizure) as well as practical advice regarding best way to handle such situations.
After the evidence in the dangerous offender hearing was completed, and after the Crown had completed its submissions, counsel for the Applicant served a notice
of constitutional question in relation to several
amendments to s. 753.
To be sure, there are storm clouds on the progressive legal horizon: the UT affirmative action case; Shelby County and the future
of the VRA; the reargument in Kiobel; the Article III standing
question in the
constitutional challenge to the FISA
Amendments Act; and a host
of other cases in the food chain in which the Court's conservative majority is likely to assert itself at the expense
of progressives.