So, instead of framing
the question of global climate policy in terms of national self - interest, how about we frame it in terms of «doing the right thing»?
Not exact matches
- A
Question of Balance: Weighing the Options on
Global Warming
Policies by William Nordhaus and
Global Warming: Looking Beyond Kyoto by Ernesto Zedillo, two
climate - change books he is writing about for The New York Review
of Books
The first thorough response to my
question is from David Victor, the University
of California, San Diego, energy and
climate policy researcher and author
of «
Global Warming Gridlock.»
pg xiii This Policymakers Summary aims to bring out those elements
of the main report which have the greatest relevance to
policy formulation, in answering the following
questions • What factors determine
global climate 7 • What are the greenhouse gases, and how and why are they increasing 9 • Which gases are the most important 9 • How much do we expect the
climate to change 9 • How much confidence do we have in our predictions 9 • Will the
climate of the future be very different 9 • Have human activities already begun to change
global climate 9 How much will sea level rise 9 • What will be the effects on ecosystems 9 • What should be done to reduce uncertainties, and how long will this take 9 This report is intended to respond to the practical needs
of the policymaker.
This seems the whole point
of question # 1 and only thing
of interest to
policy makers - the entire relevance
of everything and anything to do with studies
of global climate [which is different than the subject
of climate and / or weather].
If
climate change, as the Pope's recent encyclical claims, is a profound
global justice, ethical, and moral problem, this paper identifies
questions that should be asked
of opponents
of climate change
policies to expose the ethical problems with their positions.
In addition to the ethical problems with cost arguments identified above in response to
questions one and two, this
question is also designed to expose the fact that a nation that refuses to reduce its ghg emissions to its fair share
of safe
global emissions is violating promises it made under the UNFCCC to adopt»
policies and measures to prevent dangerous anthropocentric interference with the
climate system.»