Sentences with phrase «question of national law»

The permitted use of automated functions in road traffic is not just a question of national law, but is also subject to regulations at international level.

Not exact matches

Earlier this year, he notoriously tussled with U.S. National Security Agency director Michael Rogers over the question of whether law enforcement should have access to peoples» private communications, a debate now raging between Washington D.C. and Silicon Valley.

I could air, in public, questions that will probably be tried in courts of law later, and make spotting the contradictions a national parlour game.

Deborah — prophet, judge, national leader (Judges 4 - 5)[McKnight says, «if we ask what did women do, and we ask this question of Deborah, we learn that women could speak for God as a prophet, render decisions n a law court as a judge, exercise leadership over the entire spiritual - social Israel, and be a military commander who brought Israel to victory.»

The National Jewish Commission on Law and Public Affairs (COLPA) has been formed as a counterweight to the «strict separationism» of other Jewish organizations on church - state questions.

Central Ave., Suite 501 St. Louis, MO 63105 314-863-8484 [email protected] Services: US, SN, SGA, DA, CA, AR, M INDIANA Steven M. Kirsh 3190 Old Tunnel Rd. Lafayette, CA 94549 925-945-1880 Advocates for Children and Families 16831 NE Sixth Ave. North Miami Beach, FL 33162 The Hicks Law Group 368 South Perry St. Lawrenceville, GA 30046 678-985-1000 Kirsh & Kirsh, P.C. 2930 East 96th St. Indianapolis, IN 46240 317-575-5555 ADOPTION SERVICES: US US Adoption, IC Inter-Country Adoption, SGA Step / Grandparent Adoption, SN Special Needs Adoption, DA Disrupted Adoption, CA Contested Adoption, AR Assisted Reproduction, M Mediation 2011 Adoption Guide 73 http://www.theadoptionguide.com http://www.theadoptionguide.com/tools/attorney-search http://www.theadoptionguide.com/tools/attorney-search http://www.familyformation.com http://www.thehickslawgroup.com http://www.adoptionflorida.org http://www.anchoragefamilylaw.net/ http://www.AdoptionNetwork.com http://www.adoption-surrogacy.com http://www.familybuildinglaw.com http://www.mccarthyweston.com http://www.brandonfamilylaw.com http://www.ellynbullocklaw.com http://www.jenniferfairfax.com http://www.meiserlaw.com http://www.theadoptionadvisor.com http://www.Adoption-USA.com http://www.grammerlaw.com http://www.stantonphillips.com http://www.chicagoadoptionattorney.com http://www.Adoption-USA.com http://www.adoption-option.com http://www.ILAdoptionAttorney.com http://www.floridaadoptionattorney.com http://www.adopthelp.com http://www.zavosjunckerlawgroup.com http://www.randallhicks.com Table of Contents for the Digital Edition of Adoption Guide 2011 Cover Page Slideshow: Adoptive Families» Family Album Full Table of Contents 8 Great Reasons to Adopt Now Moving on from Infertility My First Questions Timeline to Adoption Budgeting for Adoption Homestudy Preparation Worksheet Adoption Options Adoption Decision Matrix Domestic Adoption International Adoption Foster - Adoption Medical & Surrogacy Options National Adoption Directory Adoption Attorney Worksheet Attorney Listings Choosing an Adoption Agency Adoption Agency Worksheet Agency Listings U.S. Newborn Ethiopia China Hong Kong Russia Ukraine South Korea Colombia Bulgaria Taiwan India Kazakhstan Haiti Philippines Ghana Uganda Thailand Poland Other Countries to Consider Adoption Guide 2011 http://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/newhope/adoptionguide2012 http://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/newhope/adoptionguide2011 http://www.nxtbookMEDIA.com

Each state has its own laws governing independent adoptions (which are illegal in Colorado, 2011 Adoption Guide 41 Table of Contents for the Digital Edition of Adoption Guide 2011 Cover Page Slideshow: Adoptive Families» Family Album Full Table of Contents 8 Great Reasons to Adopt Now Moving on from Infertility My First Questions Timeline to Adoption Budgeting for Adoption Homestudy Preparation Worksheet Adoption Options Adoption Decision Matrix Domestic Adoption International Adoption Foster - Adoption Medical & Surrogacy Options National Adoption Directory Adoption Attorney Worksheet Attorney Listings Choosing an Adoption Agency Adoption Agency Worksheet Agency Listings U.S. Newborn Ethiopia China Hong Kong Russia Ukraine South Korea Colombia Bulgaria Taiwan India Kazakhstan Haiti Philippines Ghana Uganda Thailand Poland Other Countries to Consider Adoption Guide 2011 http://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/newhope/adoptionguide2012 http://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/newhope/adoptionguide2011 http://www.nxtbookMEDIA.com

«The question of whether Article 50 is revocable is European Union law and can not be decided by the national courts, it's a question for the European Court of Justice,» she adds.

Questions - Getting value for money from companies marketing services to help people make claims against missold Payment Protection Insurance Legislation, revising the system for electing British Members of the European Parliament, dealing with any consequences for social cohesion and criminality of the withdrawal of civil legal aid for social welfare law cases, annual value of employers» national insurance contributions Legislation - Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill

Off topic questions included a Department of Investigations report detailing problems with corrections officers at Rikers Island, de Blasio's message to protestors resuming anti-NYPD protests, his relationship with police unions, a call by the head of the Lieutentants Benevolent Association to strengthen laws concerning resisting arrest, an increase in police protection for Jewish organizations and sites and Dov Hikind's claim of a decrease in police presence, delays in the implementation of the City's municipal ID card program, his message to PBA members dissatisfied with their union leadership, his position on a city council plan to fund the purchase of additional bullet - proof vests for police officers, whether the Democratic National Committee has expressed concerns around the recent protests as it considers whether to hold the 2016 convention in Brooklyn, whether his «thoughts» on the anti-NYPD protests have «evolved» and whether he will direct the NYPD to change its FOIL request process to accept email or other electronic requests.

Responding to questions on currents efforts by the National Assembly to alter the timetable for the 2019 general elections, Prof. Yakubu maintained that the Commission had, in the first place, announced the timetable in exercise of the powers conferred on it by the existing laws as contained in the Electoral Act (2010 as amended) and the 1999 Constitution (as amended).

Following a complaint, the Charity Commission found that both the asking of the question and then the press release issued with the results were «party political in nature in that they could be seen to be critical of a national political party, contrary to charity law and the Commission's guidance».

Although some question whether broadcast content is the best use of precious spectrum space, broadcast media are still the best way to get information directly to people — a role that can not be underestimated in emergencies, Dan Margolis, a lawyer with Garvey Schubert Barer's communications, media and technology industry group, said at a National Broadband Plan roundtable discussion hosted Monday by New York Law School in New York City.

Jennifer Story, national deputy chair for CFS, said under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, they are questioning whether the law is fair or if it discriminates against students.

Question: Why isn't the National Education Association doing more to educate the public about the problems of this law?

Eric Hanushek and Al Lindseth: This question is particularly timely, as national policies on education embodied in the federal No Child Left Behind (NCLB) law are in a state of flux and likely to change under President Obama.

Under the National Assessment of Educational Progress Authorization Act (Public Law 107 - 279 III, section 303), the Commissioner of the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) is charged with ensuring that NAEP tests do not question test - takers about personal or family beliefs or make information about their personal identity publicly available.

Stuart Pratt, president and chief executive of the Consumer Data Industry Association, which represents the three national bureaus, also argues that many of the proposed changes in dispute resolution are being put in place under a 2015 national settlement agreement, and therefore «we question the need for additional law.»

The Australian Christian Lobby «cautiously welcomed» the outcome of today's decision but questioned why it was not deferred until the Australian Law Reform Commission completed its review of the National Classification Scheme, which includes examining the classification of games.

A project of Widener University School of Law and Auckland University School of Architecture and Planning has examined how 17 nations have actually considered or ignored ethics and justice in formulating national climate change policies as the first phase of the project's continuing investigation of these questions.

Then there's Professor Frank McDermott saying there is no question that if the current laws were overturned, head injuries would rise.Chris Rissel was one of the authors of the 2008 national report Cycling - Getting Australia Movingr, which had the sub title of: Barriers, facilitators and interventions to get more Australians physically active through cycling.

59 The answer to the first question and the first part of the third question is therefore that European Union law must be interpreted as meaning that it does not preclude the issue of judgment by default against a defendant on whom, given that it is impossible to locate him, the document instituting proceedings has been served by public notice under national law, provided that the court seised of the matter has first satisfied itself that all investigations required by the principles of diligence and good faith have been undertaken to trace the defendant.

In its judgment of 26 February 2013, the CJEU responded to the first two questions in the affirmative, and clarified that Article 53 of the Charter only allows national authorities to apply higher standards of protection of fundamental rights where an EU legal act calls for national implementing measures, but not where, as in this case, the EU legal act harmonises the law between the Member States.

In this post on EU asylum law, Louis takes the occasion of a Dutch court referring this exact question to the CJEU to introduce us to the difficulties and pitfalls of verification of the sexual orientation of asylum seekers before national authorities.

The question didn't go away when I went to law school, so when I had a chance to write a seminar paper on the topic, I jumped in and did a national research study of prospective students, current law students, professors, practicing attorneys, and NALP hiring partners.

Some particular questions remain unanswered though, such as e.g. what happens in a case where the national law only states that domestic conversions of companies are possible but does not contain any procedural rules regarding the conversion of companies.

If, as with investor state dispute settlement, such a claim would bypass the national courts and thus the preliminary ruling architecture, then the decision of the joint court would constitute an application of the EU law manifested in the withdrawal agreement with a result that would be binding upon the host Member State in question.

In these three orders, the SCC concluded that the constitutional questions did not meet the relevance test because, under the principle of primacy of EU law, a national provision that is found to be incompatible with EU law must be displaced and can not be applied by the national courts when deciding a case.

With respect to judicial interpretation, therefore, while the national legal traditions on which the articles and rules in question are modeled can provide some guidance, over-reliance on a narrow inquiry can lead to the perpetuation of the default position, according to which, as Byrne («The new public international lawyer and the hidden art of international criminal trial practice», 25 Connecticut Journal of Int» l Law (2005) 243) notes, some international judges «interpret legal norms through the lexicons of their respective traditions», rather than through a truly sui generis prism.

It should be questioned whether increasing confusion surrounding European data protection law may lead to businesses lacking certainty over exactly what national laws they should comply with and consumers being less well protected overall (That said, the difficulty presented by pan-European variations in data protection law may be less of an issue once the GDPR has introduced more conformity).

The question to be referred is whether the Directive precluded the imposition in national law of a requirement that a person must also be unmarried in order to qualify for a state pension, where a gender change occurred.

Advocate General Cruz - Villalón, found that the offence of murder and hence the question of the application of a more lenient sentence was a matter of national law.

It can also be a problem of the system of EU law which might be slightly different from a system of national law and that is why the questions and answers would not fit.

Committee members asked tough questions about whether legislative changes are needed, deference to decisions made by other law societies, national mobility issues and constitutional issues about freedom of religion and equality.

The Supreme Court's job is to resolve questions of significant national importance and to make sure that the law is interpreted and applied consistently throughout the nation.

In essence, this dispute can be reconstructed as a disagreement about which constitutional right should drive the interpretation of the Directive and, by implication, the national law implementing it, as well as reviving the question of what should happen in case German constitutional law and EU law came to a real clash.

With regard to the question of compatibility of the imposition of a residence condition with Articles 29 and 33 of the Directive, after having found that these Articles in principle require an equal treatment of all beneficiaries of international protection as regards the freedom of movement (Article 33) and a treatment that is equal to nationals of the relevant Member State in the matter of welfare benefits (Article 29), the Court concludes that a residence condition can still be imposed on beneficiaries of subsidiary protection status, if they are not in an objectively comparable situation with beneficiaries of other international protection status or nationals of the Member States as regards the objective pursued by the national law that seems to infringe on Articles 29 and 33 (point 54 of the judgment).

Within the scope of application of EU law national courts can already now apply higher standards of fundamental rights protection based on the ECHR and are obliged in cases of doubt to submit a question to the CJEU in the framework of a preliminary reference procedure.

This is because determining the substantive answer to this gap in the EU law found in Article 50 TEU is irrelevant for the national court to determine the answer to the UK constitutional law question of whether the requirements for withdrawing from the European Union have been fulfilled.

As a conclusion, one can say that the CJEU did not only reply to the question raised by Advocate General Kokott whether «EU law require [s] the courts of the Member States to refrain from applying certain provisions of their national law on the limitation periods applicable to the prosecution of criminal offences in order to guarantee the effective punishment of tax offences» (§ 1 of the Opinion).

The CJEU's reasoning mainly focuses on the third question, considering this to be the «essence» of Italian's judge's request, and reformulates the question as follows: «does a national rule such as that established by the provisions at issue [amount] to an impediment to the effective fight against VAT evasion in the Member State concerned, in a manner incompatible with Directive 2006/112 and, more generally, with EU law» (§ 34)?

In Part II of the book, local experts from 12 national jurisdictions respond to a common set of questions designed to identify the local nuances of law and practice that practitioners may encounter in responding to a cross-border investigation.

But a more accurate title might be a «national civil law lesson,» since less than 2 % of the questioning was focused on criminal justice issues that occupy 50 % of the work of the Supreme Court.

Barbara Mayden co-authored with Valerie Fontaine an article in the National Association of Legal Search Consultants Newsletter, proposing that just as law firms request lateral partner candidates to answer questions in an «LPQ — Lateral Partner Questionnaire,» perhaps lateral partner candidates should provide prospective firms with their own set of questions — an «LFQ — Lateral Firm Questionnaire» so to speak.

Here, the Commission had suggested that the field of the correct assessment of income tax was not harmonised and that because of the limited content of Directive 77/799 the questions asked by the Czech court fell simply within the scope of national law.

The AG suggested, in reference to the first question referred for a preliminary ruling, that the Court must declare that it has jurisdiction for the main reason that the HTSs should be regarded as acts of the institutions, bodies, offices or agencies of the Union for the purposes of Article 267 of the Treaty on the functioning of the Union («TFEU»), which is the primary law basis of the cooperation between the CJEU and the national courts via the preliminary ruling system.

It is here that the question arises whether national rules for penalties applicable to infringements of VAT legislation (that VAT legislation being an implementation of directive 2006 / 112 / EC) can be considered implementation of Union law.

In summary, as the analysis will be subsequently focus on the jurisdictional question, the AG favours a more or less full protection of a company's personality rights under Article 16 and 17 of the EU Charter (paras 41 - 51) but also stresses that companies enjoy certain rights under national statutory law, which is why the question does not require addressing in the first place (paras 52 - 60).

Again, this raises the not - too - rhetorical question of what changed in the laws of nature governing reality in common law Canada — at least reality as it exists outside of the National Capital Region and the boundaries of the various provincial and territorial legislatures — so that the but - for test was now almost Ivory Snow level workable?

It is obvious that the entire question of life before birth and how it should be treated requires national public discussion, and no doubt such a discussion will lead to compromise and better law; however, I do not think we will find an answer that is satisfactory to all in any century!