Sentences with phrase «question of that particular case»

It is therefore unlikely that the alternate would be a member of a group that is partisan on the question of that particular case.

Not exact matches

The essence of this particular dilemma lies in answering this initial question: Even if the upside appears to be a sure thing, can you afford to accept your fate in the event that the worse - case scenario of a life decision implodes on you?
Thus the particular question that has been at the heart of a lot of our religious liberty cases in the past few years — the question of whether institutions in the corporate form are entitled to religious liberty — is not a new question for our political tradition, and the answer that tradition has often offered it is not always friendly to the cause of contemporary traditionalists.
Israeli archaeologist Yosef Garfinkel announced earlier this week several findings which may contribute toward a positive case for the veracity of biblical history, in particular the question of whether a centralized Israelite kingdom existed during the era of the biblically purported King David....
This is so even in regard to detailed questions of what the Church's ministry in particular cases could and should have done and what it should not have done.
If we think of «theory» as the forming of generalizations or synoptic judgments and think of «practice» as requiring judgments about particular cases, then inquiry guided by these three types of questions will always require capacities for doing both.
In conclusion, even though Hartshorne himself questions divine relativity in the case of inferior emotions and ignorance, we have seen that, for any particular experience, the assertion that the relative nature of God knows that experience by feeling it in exactitude is unwarranted.
I also thank Kristen Robinson Doe for citing particular cases of great relevance to my argument — although it should also be mentioned that political philosophy is one surviving sub-discipline (my own, it turns out) in which the big questions can still be explored.
«There is clearly a question to be examined in each case as to whether a particular appointment in a particular place but that such appointments can happen and should be capable of happening in future has to be recognised.»
Nor can it settle the problem of the competence to decide competence, that is to say, the question who is ultimately to decide in any particular case whether the teaching Church or secular science has overstepped its limits.
Here he writes, in connection with the question of reconstructing authentic teaching of Jesus, «we have reasonably secure ground under our feet only in one particular instance, namely, when there is some way of showing that a piece of tradition has not been derived from Judaism and may not be ascribed to early Christianity, and this is particularly the case when Jewish Christianity has regarded this tradition as too bold and has toned it down or modified it in some way».
The question is the ontological status of the finite particular upon which he bases his existentially worded case.
I think its time to do something about this, over the 2 legs, ireland were clearly the better side, that notwithstanding this particular french team is the worst i've seen in decades, and they have no bussines going to the world cup.It is time for replays to be reviewed in some cases and goaline technology to be applied in other cases, i think we human being have come of age to realise that we humans are not perfect, no matter how hard we try, so for sepp blatter to keep resisting replays and goal line technology is quite baffling to me, i can't really understand why 3 socalled officials could make a decision, a decision in which the whole world saw to be a foul, and its allowed to stand, and a nation is left, heartbroken, cheated and bitter, i am an african, but as a fan of football, i felt terrible seeing this, and i beg the question, if someone other than the team is not benefiting from this, why can't the officials be allowed to take a look at the replays in order to officiate the game better?
In this particular case it is not clear whether the baby would have survived had the mother been under the care of an obstetrician, since the baby may or may not have had congenital anomalies; but there is no question that the baby would have had a much better chance of surviving if her mother had had appropriate care for a postdates pregnancy and an ultrasound that had revealed any potential problems that might have been addressed in a timely fashion.
Determining whether coed youth sports are appropriate in cases where the children are 9 - years - old and older must be decided on an individual basis, depending on the circumstances involved in that particular situation with the final determination being the parent of the child in question.
Like any case where someone is asked to consider international law, you begin with an analysis of the particular players in the conflict and the history of the dispute, because these questions don't have answers in the abstract.
In order to address the question, I estimate what the party first preference votes would be in the different constituencies, assuming similar (proportional) changes in party vote shares in all constituencies to those that are being suggested by a particular opinion poll, or — in this case — an average of the most recent polls.
Regardless of the rights and the wrongs of this particular case it does raise very important questions about the relationship between ministers and civil servants.
«However, this remains a very complex case involving legal advice relating to the decision in question, particular features of the children's background and an external agency responsible for finding and providing the foster carers concerned.»
Her research focuses on devolution, governance rescaling, territorial politics, regionalism and democracy — with a particular emphasis on the «English Question» and the case of Northern England.
Some of these have focused on case studies and specific questions — we call these mini-features — while others are stand - alone articles exploring a particular issue.
At the end of this particular course, Angela may well give Steve a low rating as she didn't like having her ideas questioned, but in this case that's the mark of effective learning — it's not always enjoyable.
The bottom line is to question and critically consume everything, and everyone who feels qualified to write about particular things without enough expertise in most everything, including in this case good and professional journalism, this area of educational research, and what it means to make valid inferences and then responsibly share them out with the public.
Therefore, a graduate assistant was instructed to excerpt 1 - to 2 - minute video segments that seemed to represent units of activity, but without regard to the video clip showing examples of particular teacher or student behaviors (in this case, classroom management and student questioning).
One local school board member has banned me from commenting on his «public figure» Facebook page (which I see as a free speech violation), both because I questioned his denial of SGPs and some other conflicts of interests I saw, although indirectly related to this particular case.
While this particular case is centered on books published outside of the US, it does bring up an interesting question.
In a specific case, of course, you can form a pointed enough question to determine if there is coverage for that particular event, but if you're asking «what if» questions, you'll find the answer often includes a «but» or an «unless.»
I've edited my question to provide a bit more detail: the $ 15K basement estimate is an «average» for our size of home, and I agree that this could vary quite a bit in our particular case; right now, in Ontario, mortgage interest rates are around 3.0 % for a five - year fixed (how they're commonly done); and I added the Canada tag.
One of the questions asked by a reader concerned a cat that becomes aggressive to a particular person (in this case, the cat belongs to one woman and attacks her mother).
Instead, the exhibition offers a sequence of historical case studies focused on particular moments and concepts — from questions of representation to the fight for civil rights — that remain relevant today.
In any case, I know of no other field where like climate science the leading researchers in the field have taken a strong position on a political policy question that relies on their science turning out a particular way.
In any case, it is good to have a list of what you have to question if, in particular, you want to argue that the warming in the past half - century has been dominated by internal variability.
In this particular case, I am only questioning the validity of the test.
As soon as you appreciate that the (local) equilibrium constraint is an approximation, you appreciate that it has an inaccuracy, and the question arises whether that inaccuracy is sufficiently great as to matter in particular cases: here, the particular cases of heat transfer within the Earth climate system.
And, while I'm not pointing a finger personally, I think, too many people in this particular case adopted your way of questioning rather than mine.
I'm asking Judy questions to figure out if, in any particular case the difficulties both Tom V and Gerry B bring up are hypothetical or of practical importance to climate modeling.
If the response involves discussions of the law, one approach a lawyer might take is to stress that your response should only be considered as a general guideline to the issues raised by a particular question, but that to provide legal advice you would need to speak personally to better understand the particular facts of the case being presented.
However, in this case, Article 50, as a legal basis, would be virtually unlimited in its material scope, which may raise constitutional questions, in particular as regards the principle of conferral.
Thus far most of the relevant cases (Pfleiderer, Donau Chemie, Energie Baden - Württemberg) have dealt with questions concerning access to the file in general and access to leniency applications and related documents in particular.
Some particular questions remain unanswered though, such as e.g. what happens in a case where the national law only states that domestic conversions of companies are possible but does not contain any procedural rules regarding the conversion of companies.
The Court confirmed that the concept includes «data concerning the medium to long - term consequences of those emissions on the environment, in particular information relating to residues in the environment following application of the product in question, and studies on the measurement of the substance's drift during that application, whether those data come from studies performed entirely or in part in the field or from laboratory or translocation studies» (case C - 442 / 14, paragraph 96).
Centrally, the decision raises the question as to why the Court sticks to the private investor test in the particular circumstances of the given case.
Recent case law demonstrates that the critical question for the court in breach of confidence cases is to analyse how Arts 8 and 10 apply to the facts of a particular case.
Professor White suggests that it does matter how opinions are written because they have important consequences for the parties in a particular case and for the future.29 He further argues that a crucial part of legal activity is the criticism of opinions on rational, political, and moral grounds because that is how relevant arguments are made in support of changing or retaining current rules of law.30 For him, the bigger question «is whether law will move in the direction of trivializing human experience, and itself, or in the direction of dignifying itself and that experience.»
The crucial question at the heart of this particular case was whether, following Mr Kernott's departure from 39 Badger Hall Avenue, an intention between the parties could be found which would rebut the presumption of joint beneficial ownership (which presumption generally arises where there is joint legal ownership and no express declaration of trust that the co-owners should own in anything other than equal shares).
Whether a particular measure or government act can be explained by reference to one of those objectives, however, is ultimately a question of fact that will have to be examined on a case - by - case basis.
Yes, it is not that one is detached from the problems that are at stake in a concrete case, but it is good to get feedback on your work, in particular on the question of whether people can understand it.
The question is not, or course, what the testator meant to do when he made his will, but what the written words he uses mean in the particular case — what are the «expressed intentions» of the testator.»
In order to answer this question, a lawyer should start with a baseline (how often does any appellant win an appeal) and adjust based on the particular circumstances of each case.
It is necessary in each case to consider whether, in the particular circumstances of that case, the failure in question is capable of constituting evidence supporting the inference that the respondent acted discriminatorily in the manner alleged; and, if so, whether in the light of any explanation supplied it does in fact justify that inference.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z