At the end of his essay, Griffiths gives the impression that Pitstick should have limited herself to a school debate with Balthasar over the merits of his theology of Christ's descent rather than raising the formal
question of orthodoxy.
Not exact matches
Karl Barth was a creative, innovative theologian, so much so that Calvinists
of strict observance
question his
orthodoxy, and a Thomist - inspired Matthew Rose reads Barth as beholden to modern assumptions («Karl Barth's Failure,» June 2014).
At the end
of our discussion, I still had one
question: «All that being said Father, and granting the necessity, beauty, and
orthodoxy of the Council's teachings» how did their implementation go so disastrously wrong in the immediate years that followed?»
It is more because I want Anthony Burgess blotted out as a flaw in the universe: a terrible sin
of presumption,
orthodoxy might counter, for who am I to
question my worth to God?
Questions also are raised about the identity
of the church that plays such a major role in the Radical Orthodox account
of history, about whether there is a doctrine
of providence implicit in it, about the dismissal or ignoring
of Protestantism, about the role
of Jesus in its Christianity, about the role
of Socrates in its Platonism, about its failure to engage with the challenge
of modern scientific and technological developments, about how other faith traditions are related to this version
of faith, and about whether this is a habitable
orthodoxy for ordinary life.
Feminist and liberation theologians have
questioned the new
orthodoxy's valorization
of divine helplessness, expressing concern over whether the emphasis on God sharing our abuse and death may underwrite our own passive acquiescence to violence.
You know: the subject
of God's love is not an either / or
question in the face
of orthodoxy.
As you turn it is inevitable that you should
question orthodoxies, be suspicious
of opinions that serve the interests
of those who adopt them, and explore the problems that confront us without fear
of being proven wrong.
Hence if Wojtyla is going to ask and answer seriously the
question of what it is like to be a Christian, he has to start off with the traditional doctrines; he has to start off with pure, uncompromising
orthodoxy.
Now if we consider the
question of what it is like to be a believer, and if we mean by a believer someone fully formed by
orthodoxy, we have to admit that there are very few believers out there.
Along the way, Protestants demonstrated what Catholics already knew» namely, that the Bible never stands alone but, even in its translation, is situated in a web
of relationships that involve the authority
of church leaders and
questions about who has responsibility for determining
orthodoxy.
That the
question is a viable one points to something that may be less obvious to those outside
of Orthodoxy's circle, and that is that the Orthodox in America are in the process
of figuring out just who we are.
But I've come to see the
question as mostly the fault
of the Orthodox themselves, who have not quite figured out how to convey that
Orthodoxy — being Christianity — is for everyone and doesn't require a particular cultural identification.
The condom has become a symbol
of freedom and - along with contraception - female emancipation, so those who
question condom
orthodoxy are accused
of being against these causes.»
Change or Die will become the mantra
of those that deeply
question the rightness or utility
of so many
orthodoxies (and unorthodoxies too).
The book
of Job is an excellent example
of a dialogue which
questions much
of absolute
orthodoxy.
Those
of us outside Rome and
Orthodoxy should note that the
question of where the one true Church resides is not quite the problem that Mr. Nuechterlein says it is.
Only so, it would seem, was the certitude
of orthodoxy attained; when
questions of his reality and his nature had been honestly met, then, and then only, could the best thinkers affirm: «All the gods
of the nations are vanities; but the Lord made the heavens» (Ps.
Growing religious diversity and the loosening
of confessional
orthodoxy have meant that Americans can no longer expect to deal with public political
questions from a common theological perspective.
Questions about the unity and authorship
of a book can not be settled in terms
of a scholar's
orthodoxy but solely on the basis
of his competence in assessing the evidence.
He punctured the complacent acceptance
of the current
orthodoxy with insistent
questioning — «Why?»
Especially is this so, as long as there remains a certain hangover from the not so distant past when
orthodoxy was virtuous, doubt was appalling, and heresy was morally wicked, if, then, without being repelled by the wide range
of disagreement and uncertainty among Christian people, we ask
questions about their idea
of God, we shall expect to receive diverse answers.
I infer from Kevin Martin's
questions about papal power that he thinks that Dostoevsky would have balked at John Paul's anti «Communist mission, even though Russian
Orthodoxy was among its major beneficiaries, because papal realpolitik is un «Christian and should never be enlisted even in the cause
of Christ's Kingdom, which is not
of this world.
The absurd notion that
questioning is good but finding (or even desiring) answers is bad, far from being the bright idea Greenberg pretends it to be, is precisely the false
orthodoxy of today in academia.
Rather it means that I have a special responsibility to
question it, I have less
of a responsibility to deal with the contradictions
of Methodism, Lutheranism or Eastern
Orthodoxy.
In «A Closed
Question and Ecumenism Now» (Public Square, October), Richard John Neuhaus asserts: «Mainly because
of the fragmented condition
of Orthodoxy itself, the healing
of the millennium - old breach between Rome and the East will not likely happen anytime soon.»
These are worthy ideas, but where is the call to
question the contemporary
orthodoxy of growth?
Previous crises have been accompanied by radical
questioning of existing political and economic
orthodoxies.
Karl Hoenke
questions whether we should adhere to the medical
orthodoxy of completing a course
of antibiotics, suggesting that this might encourage the emergence
of resistant bacteria rather than discourage it (13 June, p 25).
Karl Hoenke
questions whether we should adhere to the medical
orthodoxy of completing a course
of antibiotics, suggesting that this...
Bettany's Darwin is not someone who falls away from religious
orthodoxy because such
questioning comes easily to him, but because his scientific investigations have radically altered his way
of looking at the world, whether he likes it or not.
Growing quickly, it became a magnet for noted law faculty, conveying to students that conservative thought was worthy
of consideration and creating a safe space to
question law school
orthodoxies.
Of course, one doesn't have to be a post-modernist to
question how long the Ab Ex
orthodoxy can hold.
Question: Do such considerations affect the current
orthodoxy regarding the role
of CO2 in establishing climate characteristics?
Plenty
of elements
of his past arguments
questioning scientific
orthodoxy deserve a thorough airing.
The e-mails were written by the «A-team» — members
of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change — and raise
questions if the work
of other respected scientists may have been disregarded or hampered by a climate change
orthodoxy (or «climate oligarchy») that does not value, indeed may discourage, informed debate and dissent.
«for me to raise even the driest, most analytical criticisms or
questions regarding the frame
of reference
of the «climate science»
orthodoxy is to commit a revolutionary act.»
Despite the vulnerability
of many
of his own properties to sea level rise, on the campaign trail President - elect Donald Trump stuck with Republican
orthodoxy in
questioning human - driven climate change, and criticizing the steps the Obama administration has taken to combat it.
And yes, this paper opposes some
of the IPCC
orthodoxy (
orthodoxy always needs
questioning if not opposition).
But the moderator immediately pressed Mandia back on track to the real
question of who gets funding and whether researchers outside the
orthodoxy are likely to be funded.
In a new screed against a free exchange
of ideas on climate change, «Earther» Brian Kahn argues that those who
question global warming
orthodoxy have no right to voice their opinions in public.
The response
of some GWPF scientists to the climate
orthodoxy shows that scientists do not need to be paid to have reason to
question the climate
orthodoxy.
In this manner, debate about the environment and associated issues is effectively and routinely silenced by an indiscriminate wall
of contempt that associates anyone
questioning any part
of the warming
orthodoxy as either the moral equivalent
of a neo-Nazi or
of someone who thinks the earth is flat.
IOW we have both the magnitude and the sign
of water vapor feedback still in
question (except,
of course, by the IPCC
orthodoxy, which assumes positive feedback at a rate high enough to essentially maintain constant relative humidity in lockstep with Clausius - Clapeyron).
There being no challenge to this
orthodoxy, and no
questions asked about either its effectiveness or its consequences, how could the process
of the greening
of the UK be seen as democratic?
To the consternation
of alarmists, New York Times op ed writer Bret Stephens openly
questioned the «consensus» that has demanded uniform acceptance without
question of the global warming / climate change
orthodoxy.
Perhaps there will be a cascading effect from all the papers published in the last year that will allow more
of a willingness to present papers that are
questioning the
orthodoxy.
Evidence was found in a rare mineral that records global temperatures Warming was global and NOT limited to Europe Throws doubt on
orthodoxies around «global warming» By Ted Thornhill Current theories
of the causes and impact
of global warming have been thrown into
question by a new study which shows that during medieval times the -LSB-...]
In his official statement, Soon wrote that he has «been the target
of attacks in the press by various radical environmental and politically motivated groups» and that the «effort should be seen for what it is: a shameless attempt to silence my scientific research and writings, and to make an example out
of me as a warning to any other researcher who may dare
question in the slightest their fervently held
orthodoxy of anthropogenic global warming.»
They are «a warning to any other researcher who may dare
question in the slightest their fervently held
orthodoxy of anthropogenic global warming,» says Dr. Soon.