The language of the jury
question on causation must reflect the «but for» test and ought to track the language of Clements, although having the wrong wording does not necessarily produce a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice.
Not exact matches
Focusing
on the second proof, I
question Aquinas» assertion that an infinite ordered series of
causation is impossible.
This would not only render the presumably factual principle of uniformity logically necessary, it would also beg the
question by simply denying the tenability of the claim that laws evolve and insisting
on the notion of uniform
causation.
The
question is seeking information
on causation, but I think you did a good job of laying out the data that is available without implying more than what is appropriate.
More specifically in regard to the
question of human
causation, opponents of climate change policies that deny human
causation should be expected to specifically respond to the numerous «foot - print» and «attribution» studies that the international community has relied
on to make conclusions about human
causation.
This
question, following up
on question one, is designed to expose the fact that there is a strong ethical duty to assume human
causation of climate change if there is reliable evidence of human
causation and that those who seek to justify non-action
on climate change because they claim that human
causation has not been proven have a very strong ethical duty to demonstrate that humans are not causing climate change with high levels of proof.
Rarely is human - induced climate change mentioned as a cause or contributing factor in the recent outbreak of sever tornadoes although
questions about
causation are becoming more frequent
on TV and newspapers in this writer's experience.
Climate skeptic scientists have long
questioned whether the effects of relatively minor (compared to other CO2 sources and sinks) human - caused emissions of CO2 have more than a minor effect
on global temperatures and some have even
questioned whether the UN and USEPA have even gotten the
causation backwards (i.e., because
on balance global temperatures affect atmospheric CO2 levels).
Although 1854 people completed some portion of the survey, this table only displays the results for 1821 respondents, since 33 (less than 2 % of the sample) did not answer one or more of the
questions on expertise and global warming
causation.
Still, they find a strong consensus
on human
causation of climate change: 87.4 % of respondents are to some extent convinced that most of recent or near future climate change is, or will be, the result of anthropogenic causes (
question v007).
The appeal was allowed as the trial judge made an error by failing to provide jury with a proper summary of the evidence, having referred frequently to the claimant's «entitlement» to compensation, without adequate emphasis
on the
question of legal
causation.
In his other finding
on causation he ruled that even if the sisters had
questioned Shaid Luqman about whether the directors» loan account was genuine rather than turning a blind eye to it, Shaid Luqman as an accomplished liar would easily have been able to convince them of its propriety.
Assessing the impact of the Vote Leave NHS funding pledge
on the EU referendum is a matter of
causation, a factual
question for a jury to consider and determine.
Whether legal
causation is established depends
on the facts and circumstances of the particular matter in
question.
[25] As noted by Mr. Finn, the trial judge did not go
on to determine the
question of
causation because he found that Mr. Evoy met the duty of care.
The Court stated, the «issue of proximate
causation is usually a
question for the trier of fact that can not be determined
on summary judgment» and found that the plaintiffs had provided sufficient evidence of product identification, regular and frequent use, and proximate exposure to asbestos.
Causation is a question of fact; so trial judges» findings on causation are owed deference o
Causation is a
question of fact; so trial judges» findings
on causation are owed deference o
causation are owed deference
on appeal.
The Fifth Circuit held that the press release in
question was not sufficient to satisfy the requirements to establish loss
causation because «although the stock price dropped dramatically
on the day of the 1 August 2006 press release, no new facts concerning Cyberonics» stock - option accounting were disclosed in that release which demonstrated that the «truth became known» about Cyberonics» challenged financial statements.»
The EAT dismissed the company's appeal
on liability and so the continuing argument (there and in the Court of Appeal) concentrated
on compensation, centring
on questions of
causation and speculation.