We leave
a question on your conscience - to buy books for the reader, or to download them free of charge (probably breaking copyrights).
Not exact matches
7th US Circuit Court of Appeals nominee Amy Coney Barrett, a Notre Dame law professor, was
questioned intensely about her Catholic faith as a result of past writings expressing her beliefs
on whether Catholic judges should recuse themselves from death - penalty cases if they believed they would be unable to impartially uphold the law, writing that — in limited situations — judges should step back in cases that conflict with their personal
conscience.
«Such social doctrine provides directions but, with few exceptions (for instance, the defense of innocent human life), does not provide directives of immediate applicability to policy
questions on which people of good faith, guided by reason and
conscience, can come to different conclusions.»
Liberal Catholics respond by downplaying the Church's authority, putting an accent
on freedom of
conscience and emphasizing that there's room for
questioning and doubt.
Here Bonhoeffer wrestles with a profound existential
question that plagued his
conscience: «The truthfulness of our words that we owe to God must take
on concrete form in the world.
How we discharge the duties of citizenship — whether by accepting the creeping authoritarianism of the last two decades, or by raising our voices
on behalf of the laws and democratic norms of our country — is a
question of moral
conscience, suitable for confession, and demanding repentance if we err.
This is by no means merely a formal
question, for the outcome of our examination of
conscience will depend
on where we start from.
If the Church is cautious in
questions of doctrine and discipline, perhaps even more so than in the past, if she waits for more information, carrying
on a dialogue, perhaps even leaves much to the
conscience of the individual, all this does not mean that the authorities have grown cowardly, they have not, for this reason, given up their responsibility and their power.
The
question is no longer whether couples may marry, but whether a baker may refuse to sell them a wedding cake
on the strength of his religious or moral
conscience, without risking a lawsuit.
This is the
question that must be forced upon every human
conscience by our increasing awareness of the tide of anthropogenesis
on which we are borne.
Pope Francis has reaffirmed the «primacy» of using
conscience to handle tough moral
questions in a message
on The Joy Of Love, his document which prompted warnings of a schism with its opening to civilly remarried Catholics receiving Communion.
While they support his election as pope, nearly three - quarters of American Catholics say they are more likely to follow their own
conscience on difficult moral
questions than the teachings of the pope.
In any case it seems to me that there are times when we have no choice but to follow the dictates of our
conscience, to throw ourselves
on God's mercy and not ask too many
questions.
[5] Pius XI made clear in his encyclical
on education, «when the faithful demand Catholic schools for their children, they are not raising a
question of party politics, but simply performing a religious duty which their
conscience rigidly imposes upon them.»
We believe that Catholics who, in good
conscience, take positions
on the difficult
questions of legal abortion and other controversial issues that differ from the official hierarchical positions, act within their rights and responsibilities as Catholics and citizens.
I'll try and salve my guilty
conscience with the knowledge there will be serious numbers of celebrity Arsenal «fans» who are no more worthy than me of planking their oversized backsides
on their overpriced seats, and won't
question for a second their entitlement to be there.
First Reformed: Written and directed by Paul Schrader (script - writer
on Martin Scorsese's Taxi Driver), this quiet movie becomes Dostoevsky - intense as a small - town chaplain (Ethan Hawke, going into darker territory than he's ever done before) wrestles with
questions of
conscience that prove literally explosive.
By high pricing
on ebooks, they are losing some impulse and cost
conscience buyers, but by lower pricing they would likely be driving people who would normally buy the more expensive hardcover over to the ebook market, and not just for the book in
question but for future purchases as well.
I'm not convinced a judge will buy that DA itself is not an «information provider» responsible for the development of the blogpost in
question when the discussion of publishing houses is so central to its mission that Jane says «I can not, in good
conscience, maintain a blog about this subject without being free to report
on all publishing houses.»